Skip to main content
Log in

A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Outranking Approach in Support of Business Angels’ Decision-Analysis Process for the Assessment of Companies as Investment Opportunities

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a multi-criteria method is presented for the evaluation and ranking of a selected set of companies as investment opportunities in aid of the relevant decision-analysis process of business angels. The multi-criteria methodology is based on the PROMETHEE method, which is further extended to deal with fuzzy input data in order to address the data imprecision and uncertainty of the decision process. The paper concludes by suggesting a web-based system implementation of the proposed methodology, which will significantly enhance modern business angels networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Munck, C., Saublens, C.: Introduction to business angels and business angels network activities in Europe. European Association of Business Angels Networks Secretariat (2006)

  2. Mason, C.M., Harrison, R.T.: Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments. J. Bus. Venturing 17(3), 211–236 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. European Commission—Enterprise Directorate-General: BEST report No. 1—“Benchmarking Business Angels” (2003)

  4. European Association of Business Angels Networks Secretariat: Statistics compendium based on the information provided by EBAN MEMBERS and networks having responded to the survey conducted in 2006 (2007)

  5. Zopounidis, K., Pardalos, P.M., Baourakis, G. (eds.): Fuzzy Systems in Management, Economy and Marketing. World Scientific, Singapore (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24, 228–238 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincke, J.P., Brans, P.: A preference ranking organization method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag. Sci. 31, 641–656 (1985)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Triantaphyllou, E., Lootsma, F., Mann, S.H., Pardalos, P.M.: On the evaluation and application of different scalesfor quantifying pairwise comparisons in fuzzy sets. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 3, 133–155 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Figuera, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gotze, U., Northscott, D., Schuster, P.: Investment Appraisal: Methods and Models. Springer, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S.H., Pardalos, P.M.: Minimization approach to membership evaluation in fuzzy sets and error analysis. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 66, 275–287 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Academic Press, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellman, R., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag. Sci. 17, 141–161 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Geldermann, J., Spengler, T., Rentz, O.: Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case Study: iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 115, 45–65 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yager, R.R., Filey, D.P.: Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control, p. 388. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pardalos, P.M., Siskos, Y., Zopounidis, C. (eds.): Advances in Multicriteria Analysis. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dillon, W.R., White, J.B., Rao, V.R., Filak, D.: Good science: use structural equation models to decipher complex customer relationships. Mark. Res., 9(4), 22–31 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K., Esfahanipour, A.: Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 673–83 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., Lipsey, M.W.: Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th edn. Sage Publications (2003)

  22. Harrison, R.T., Mason, C.M.: The roles of investors in entrepreneurial companies: a comparison of informal investors and venture capitalists. In: Churchill, N.C., Birley, S., Bygrave, W.D., Muzyka, D.F., Wahlbin, C., Wetzel, W.E. Jr. (eds.) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1992, pp. 388–404. Babson College, Babson Park (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jungman, H., Seppa, M.: Investment decision criteria used by V2C investors. In: Babson Entrepreneurial Research Conference, Glasgow (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spiros Mouzakitis.

Additional information

Communicated by P.M. Pardalos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mouzakitis, S., Karamolegkos, G., Ntanos, E. et al. A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Outranking Approach in Support of Business Angels’ Decision-Analysis Process for the Assessment of Companies as Investment Opportunities. J Optim Theory Appl 158, 274–283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-011-9816-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-011-9816-4

Keywords

Navigation