Abstract
This article investigates use of the Principle of Maximum Entropy for approximation of the risk-neutral probability density on the price of a financial asset as inferred from market prices on associated options. The usual strict convexity assumption on the market-price to strike-price function is relaxed, provided one is willing to accept a partially supported risk-neutral density. This provides a natural and useful extension of the standard theory. We present a rigorous analysis of the related optimization problem via convex duality and constraint qualification on both bounded and unbounded price domains. The relevance of this work for applications is in explaining precisely the consequences of any gap between convexity and strict convexity in the price function. The computational feasibility of the method and analytic consequences arising from non-strictly-convex price functions are illustrated with a numerical example.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
B is a set of impossible prices such that if B′ is another set of impossible prices then ν(B′∖B)=0, where ν denotes Lebesgue measure on I.
It is also easy to see that if d 1=k 2 or d 1=K there can be no price density p on [0,K[ consistent with this data.
In case η 1=0, remove the interval [0,k 2[ instead of ]0,k 2[ so that 0 does not become an isolated point of I 0.
References
Breeden, M., Litzenberger, R.H.: Price of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices. J. Bus. 51, 621–651 (1978)
Shimko, D.: Bounds of probability. Risk 6, 33–37 (1993)
Buchen, P.W., Kelley, M.: The maximum entropy distribution of an asset inferred from option prices. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 31, 143–159 (1996)
Avellaneda, M., Friedman, C., Holmes, R., Samperi, D.: Calibrating volatility surfaces via relative entropy minimization. Appl. Math. Finance 4, 37–64 (1997)
Avellaneda, M.: The minimum-entropy algorithm and related methods for calibrating asset-pricing models. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Doc. Math., vol. III, pp. 545–563 (1998)
Jaynes, E.: On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods. Proc. IEEE 70, 939–952 (1982)
Borwein, J., Choksi, R., Maréchal, P.: Probability distributions of assets inferred from option prices via the principle of maximum entropy. SIAM J. Optim. 14, 464–478 (2003)
Guo, D.: Maximum entropy in option pricing: a convex-spline smoothing method. J. Futures Mark. 21, 819–832 (2001)
He, C., Coleman, T.F., Li, Y.: Computation and analysis for a constrained entropy optimization problem in finance. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 222, 159–174 (2008)
Neri, C., Schneider, L.: Maximum entropy distributions inferred from option portfolios on an asset. Finance Stoch. 16, 293–318 (2012)
Rodriguez, J., Santosa, F.: Estimation of asset distributions from option prices: analysis and regularization. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 3, 374–401 (2012)
Dieudonne, J.: Sur les espaces de Köthe. J. Anal. Math. 1, 81–115 (1951)
Maréchal, P.: A note on entropy optimization. In: Lassonde, M. (ed.) Approximation, Optimization and Mathematical Economics, pp. 205–211. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2001)
Rockafellar, R.T.: Integrals which are convex functionals. Pac. J. Math. 24, 525–539 (1968)
Bose, C., Murray, R.: Duality and the computation of approximate invariant densities for nonsingular transformations. SIAM J. Optim. 18, 691–709 (2007)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank an anonymous referee who pointed out an error in our use of Köthe spaces and conjugation past the integral in an earlier version of this paper. The first author acknowledges the hospitality of the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, New Zealand during sabbatical leave, where much of this work was carried out. This work has been supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bose, C., Murray, R. Maximum Entropy Estimates for Risk-Neutral Probability Measures with Non-Strictly-Convex Data. J Optim Theory Appl 161, 285–307 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0349-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0349-x