Skip to main content
Log in

Pricing Bounds for Volatility Derivatives via Duality and Least Squares Monte Carlo

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Derivatives on the Chicago Board Options Exchange volatility index have gained significant popularity over the last decade. The pricing of volatility derivatives involves evaluating the square root of a conditional expectation which cannot be computed by direct Monte Carlo methods. Least squares Monte Carlo methods can be used, but the sign of the error is difficult to determine. In this paper, we propose a new model-independent technique for computing upper and lower pricing bounds for volatility derivatives. In particular, we first present a general stochastic duality result on payoffs involving convex (or concave) functions. This result also allows us to interpret these contingent claims as a type of chooser options. It is then applied to volatility derivatives along with minor adjustments to handle issues caused by the square root function. The upper bound involves the evaluation of a variance swap, while the lower bound involves estimating a martingale increment corresponding to its hedging portfolio. Both can be achieved simultaneously using a single linear least square regression. Numerical results show that the method works very well for futures, calls and puts under a wide range of parameter choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first equality (6) holds only when the drift \(\mu _t\) is deterministic. In this case, the realised variance is equivalent to the log-contract. For cases with stochastic drifts, an adjustment term is needed. The second equality (7) always holds.

References

  1. Whaley, R.E.: Derivatives on market volatility: hedging tools long overdue. J. Deriv. 1(1), 71–84 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grünbichler, A., Longstaff, F.A.: Valuing futures and options on volatility. J. Bank. Finance 20(6), 985–1001 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Detemple, J., Osakwe, C.: The valuation of volatility options. Eur. Finance Rev. 4(1), 21–50 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, J.E., Zhu, Y.: VIX futures. J. Futures Mark. 26(6), 521–531 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lian, G.H., Zhu, S.P.: Pricing VIX options with stochastic volatility and random jumps. Decis. Econ. Finance 36(1), 71–88 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sepp, A.: VIX option pricing in a jump-diffusion model. Risk Magazine, April 2008, pp. 84–89

  7. Baldeaux, J., Badran, A.: Consistent modelling of VIX and equity derivatives using a 3/2 plus jumps model. Appl. Math. Finance 21(4), 299–312 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cont, R., Kokholm, T.: A consistent pricing model for index options and volatility derivatives. Math. Finance 23(2), 248–274 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Carriere, J.F.: Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Insur. Math. Econ. 19(1), 19–30 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Longstaff, F.A., Schwartz, E.S.: Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financ. stud. 14(1), 113–147 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers, L.C.: Monte Carlo valuation of American options. Math. Finance 12(3), 271–286 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Haugh, M.B., Kogan, L.: Pricing American options: a duality approach. Oper. Res. 52(2), 258–270 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen, L., Broadie, M.: Primal-dual simulation algorithm for pricing multidimensional American options. Manag. Sci. 50(9), 1222–1234 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenmakers, J., Zhang, J., Huang, J.: Optimal dual martingales, their analysis, and application to new algorithms for Bermudan products. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 4(1), 86–116 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Joshi, M., Tang, R.: Effective sub-simulation-free upper bounds for the Monte Carlo pricing of callable derivatives and various improvements to existing methodologies. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 40, 25–45 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. De Marco, S., Henry-Labordere, P.: Linking vanillas and VIX options: a constrained martingale optimal transport problem. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 6(1), 1171–1194 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyon, J., Menegaux, R., Nutz, M.: Bounds for VIX futures given S&P 500 smiles. (to appear in Finance and Stochastics, 2016)

  18. Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton university press, Princeton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fries, C.P.: Foresight bias and suboptimality correction in MonteCarlo pricing of options with early exercise. In: Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2006, pp. 645–649. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Centre for Quantitative Finance and Investment Strategies has been supported by BNP Paribas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, I., Loeper, G. Pricing Bounds for Volatility Derivatives via Duality and Least Squares Monte Carlo. J Optim Theory Appl 179, 598–617 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-017-1168-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-017-1168-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation