Skip to main content
Log in

On Pareto Dominance in Decomposably Antichain-Convex Sets

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main contribution of the paper is the proof that any element in the convex hull of a decomposably antichain-convex set is Pareto dominated by at least one element of that set. Building on this result, the paper demonstrates the disjointness of the convex hulls of two disjoint decomposably antichain-convex sets, under the assumption that one of the two sets is upward. These findings are used to obtain a number of consequences on: the structure of the set of Pareto optima of a decomposably antichain-convex set; the separation of two decomposably antichain-convex sets; the convexity of the set of maximals of an antichain-convex relation; the convexity of the set of maximizers of an antichain-quasiconcave function. Emphasis is placed on the invariance of the solution set of a problem under its “convexification.” Some entailments in the field of mathematical economics of the results of the paper are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A variant of that definition had already appeared in [14] to prove a fixpoint theorem.

  2. For the definition of a strict partial order see [19, p. 26] and note that there “the preference order is usually assumed to be at least a strict partial order” (see [19, p. 27]).

  3. This result has consequences of interest for economic theory. Note, for instance, that Theorem 3.2 allows to generalize Proposition 5.F.2 in [24] by replacing in its statement “convex” with “decomposably \(\mathrm {I\!R}_{+}^{n}\)-antichain-convex” (because any production vector that is profit-maximizing on \({\text {*}}{conv}(Y)\) must be profit-maximizing on Y).

  4. For a concrete example of application of the separation result shown in Remark 4.3, see Theorem 7 in [12] and note that the mentioned separation result can replace part 2 of Theorem 4 in [12] in the proof of Theorem 7 in [12]: in such a proof, at least one of the sets \(\hat{A}\) and B has nonempty interior when V is not finite-dimensional.

  5. Namely, \(h(a)\le h(b)\) for all \((a,b)\in U\times U\) such that \(a\le b\).

  6. When \(V=\mathrm {I\!R}^{n}\), the value of the price functional at the consumption \(x\in X\) specifies the expenditure px given by the scalar product of \(p\in \mathrm {I\!R}^{n}\) and x: the vector p is called a price.

References

  1. Guesnerie, R.: Pareto optimality in non-convex economies. Econometrica 43, 1–29 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan, M.A., Vohra, R.: An extension of the second welfare theorem to economies with nonconvexities and public goods. Q. J. Econ. 102, 223–241 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan, M.A., Vohra, R.: Pareto optimal allocations of nonconvex economies in locally convex spaces. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 12, 943–950 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnisseau, J.M., Cornet, B.: Valuation equilibrium and Pareto optimum in non-convex economies. J. Math. Econ. 17, 293–308 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan, M.A.: The Mordukhovich normal cone and the foundations of welfare economics. J. Pub. Econ. Theory 1, 309–338 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mordukhovich, B.S.: An abstract extremal principle with applications to welfare economics. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 251, 187–216 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnisseau, J.M.: The marginal pricing rule in economies with infinitely many commodities. Positivity 6, 275–296 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Flåm, S., Jourani, A.: Prices and Pareto Optimization. Optimze 55, 611–625 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Florenzano, M., Gourdel, P., Jofré, A.: Supporting weakly Pareto optimal allocations in infinite dimensional nonconvex economies. Econ. Theory 29, 549–564 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jofré, A., Rivera, J.: A nonconvex separation property and some applications. Math. Program. 108, 37–51 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Habte, A., Mordukhovich, B.S.: Extended second welfare theorem for nonconvex economies with infinite commodities and public goods. In: S. Kusuoka, T. Maruyama (eds.) Advances in Mathematical Economics, pp. 93–126. Tokyo (2011)

  12. Ceparano, M.C., Quartieri, F.: A second welfare theorem in a non-convex economy: the case of antichain-convexity. J. Math. Econ. 81, 31–47 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Border, K.C.: Fixed Point Theorems with Applications to Economics and Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Ceparano, M.C., Quartieri, F.: Nash equilibrium uniqueness in nice games with isotone best replies. J. Math. Econ. 70, 154–165 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jofré, A., Jourani, A.: Characterizations of the free disposal condition for nonconvex economies on infinite dimensional commodity spaces. SIAM J. Optim. 25, 699–712 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Starr, R.M.: Quasi-equilibria in markets with non-convex preferences. Econometrica 37, 25–38 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ekeland, I., Témam, R.: Convex analysis and variational problems. SIAM 56, 988 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan, A.A., Tammer, C., Zălinescu, C.: Set-valued Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, H., Tanino, T.: Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Elsevier, London (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jahn, J.: Vector Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Luc, D.T.: Theory of Vector Optimization. Springer, Berlin (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Eichfelder, G.: Variable Ordering Structures in Vector Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelley, J.L., Namioka, I.: Linear Topological Spaces. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1963)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Giannessi, F.: Constrained Optimization and Image Space Analysis, Vol. 1: Separation of Sets and Optimality Conditions. Springer (2005)

  27. Polyrakis, I.A.: Demand functions and reflexivity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, 695–704 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers, an Associate Editor, and an Editor-in-Chief, for valuable suggestions which improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Carmela Ceparano.

Additional information

Communicated by Xiaoqi Yang.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ceparano, M.C., Quartieri, F. On Pareto Dominance in Decomposably Antichain-Convex Sets. J Optim Theory Appl 186, 68–85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01696-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01696-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation