Abstract
We consider the problem of minimizing a polynomial function of degree three over the boundary of the sphere. If the objective is quadratic instead of cubic, this is the well-studied trust region subproblem, which is known to be tractable. In the cubic case, the problem turns out to be NP-hard. In this paper, we derive and evaluate different approaches for computing lower bounds for the cubic problem. Alternatively to semidefinite programming relaxations proposed in the literature, our approaches do not lift the problem to higher dimensions. The strongest bounds are obtained by Lagrangian decomposition, resulting in a number of parameterized quadratic problems for which the above-mentioned results can be exploited, in particular the existence of a tractable dual problem. In an experimental evaluation, we consider the cubic one-spherical optimization problem, with homogeneous objective function, and compare the bounds generated with the different approaches proposed, for small examples from the literature and for randomly generated instances of varied dimensions.


Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anjos, M.F., Lasserre, J.B.: Handbook of Semidefinite. Conic and Polynomial Optimization. Springer, New York (2011)
Basser, P.J., Mattiello, J., LeBihan, D.: MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. J. 66, 259–267 (1994)
Basser, P.J., Mattiello, J., LeBihan, D.: Estimation of the effective seldiffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J. Mag. Reson. B 103, 247–254 (1994)
Basser, P.J., Jones, D.K.: Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis-a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15, 456–467 (2002)
Buchheim, C., De Santis, M., Palagi, L., Piacentini, M.: An exact algorithm for nonconvex quadratic integer minimization using ellipsoidal relaxations. SIAM J. Optim. 23(3), 1867–1889 (2013)
Chen, B., He, S., Li, Z., Zhang, S.: Maximum block improvement and polynomial optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 22(1), 87–107 (2012)
Fiacco, A.: Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 165. Academic Press Inc, Orlando (1983)
He, S., Li, Z., Zhang, S.: Approximation algorithms for homogeneous polynomial optimization with quadratic constraints. Math. Program. 125(2), 353–383 (2010)
Henrion, D., Lasserre, J.-B., Loefberg, J.: GloptiPoly 3: moments, optimization and semidefinite programming. Optim. Methods Softw. 24(4–5), 761–779 (2009)
Laserre, J.-B.: A Semidefinite programming approach to the generalized problem of moments. Math. Program. 112, 65–92 (2008)
Laserre, J.-B.: Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAM J. Optim. 11(3), 796–817 (2001)
Liu, C., Bammer, R., Acar, B., Moseley, M.: Characterizing non-gaussian diffusion by using generalized diffusion tensors. Magn. Reson. Med. 51, 924–937 (2004)
Lucidi, S., Palagi, L.: Solution of the trust region problem via a smooth unconstrained reformulation. In: Topics in Semidefinite and Interior-Point Methods, vol. 18. Fields Institute Communications, pp. 237–250. AMS, Providence (1998)
Mai, N.H.A., Lasserre, J.-B., Magron, V., Wang, J.: Exploiting constant trace property in large-scale polynomial optimization. (Forthcoming) (2020)
Nesterov, Y.E. Random walk in a simplex and quadratic optimization over convex polytopes. CORE Discussion Paper 2003/71, CORE-UCL (2003)
Nie, J.: Sum of squares methods for minimizing polynomial forms over spheres and hypersurfaces. Front. Math. China 7(2), 321–346 (2012)
Nie, J., Wang, L.: Semidefinte relaxations for best rank-1 tensor approximations. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 35, 1155–1179 (2014)
Polyak, B.: Introduction to Optimization. Optimization Software, New York (1987)
So, A.M.: Deterministic approximation algorithms for sphere constrained homogeneous polynomial optimization problems. Math. Program. B 129, 357–382 (2011)
Stern, R.J., Wolkowicz, H.: Indefinite trust region subproblems and nonsymmetric eigenvalue perturbations. SIAM J. Optim. 5, 286–313 (1995)
Tseng, P.: Convergence of a block coordinate descent method for nondifferentiable minimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 109, 475–494 (2001)
Zhang, T., Golub, G.H.: Rank-1 approximation of higher-order tensors. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 23, 534–550 (2001)
Zhang, X., Qi, L., Ye, Y.: The cubic spherical optimization problems. Math. Comput. 81(279), 1513–1525 (2012)
Zhang, X., Ling, C., Qi, L., Wu, E.X.: The measure of diffusion skewness and kurtosis in magnetic resonance imaging. Pacific J. Optim. 6, 391–404 (2010)
Acknowledgements
C. Buchheim has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 764759. M. Fampa was supported in part by CNPq-Brazil grants 303898/2016-0 and 434683/2018-3 and O. Sarmiento was supported in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. He did part of the research for this paper at TU Dortmund, first supported by CAPES, and then as an invited visitor researcher. The authors are very grateful to N. H. A. Mai, J.-B. Lasserre, and J. Wang, for personal correspondence with helpful insights into the experiment with their recent code ctpPOP2. The authors are also grateful to the two anonymous referees for their suggestions, which significantly improved the presentation of our work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Alexander Mitsos.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 1
We consider each problem on the right-hand side of (2) independently and show that all appearing minima can be obtained in closed form. First, note that
using the notation of Sect. 2. For \(x_i\in \{-1,0,1\}\), this expression is zero. In summary, taking the minimum over \(x_i\in [-1,1]\), we obtain
since this expression is always non-positive. Moreover,
and hence
Also,
and hence
Next, to compute \(\min _{x_{i}\in [-1,1]}a_{iii}x_{i}^{3} + a_{ii}x_i^2+a_ix_i\), we must consider the different cases described in the following.
If \(a_{iii}\ne 0\), let
If \({\hat{x}}_i^- \in [-1,1]\) and \({\hat{x}}_i^+ \in [-1,1]\), then we define
If \({\hat{x}}_i^- \notin [-1,1]\), we should disregard the cubic polynomial in \({\hat{x}}_i^-\) when computing the minimum in (26). Analogously, if \({\hat{x}}_i^+ \notin [-1,1]\), we should disregard the cubic polynomial in \({\hat{x}}_i^+\) when computing the minimum in (26).
If \(a_{iii} = 0\), then if \(a_{ii}\ne 0\) and \(-\frac{a_i}{2a_{ii}}\notin [-1,1]\), we define
If \(a_{iii} = 0\), then if \(a_{ii}\ne 0\) and \(-\frac{a_i}{2a_{ii}}\in [-1,1]\), we define
Finally, if \(a_{iii} = a_{ii}= 0\), we define
Adding up (23)–(25) with either (26), (27), (28), or (29), we obtain
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchheim, C., Fampa, M. & Sarmiento, O. Lower Bounds for Cubic Optimization over the Sphere. J Optim Theory Appl 188, 823–846 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-021-01809-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-021-01809-y