Abstract
A metric approach to Popper’s verisimilitude question is proposed which is related to point-free geometry. Indeed, we define the theory of approximate metric spaces whose primitive notions are regions, inclusion relation, minimum distance, and maximum distance between regions. Then, we show that the class of possible scientific theories has the structure of an approximate metric space. So, we can define the verisimilitude of a theory as a function of its (approximate) distance from the truth. This avoids some of the difficulties arising from the known definitions of verisimilitude.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumenthal, L. M.: Theory and Applications of Distance Geometry, Chelsea, New York, 1970.
Burger, I. C. and Heidema, J.: Comparing theories by their positive and negative contents, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1993), 605–630.
Gerla, G. and Volpe, R.: Without points geometry, American Mathematical Monthly 92 (1985), 707–711.
Gerla, G.: Pointless metric spaces, Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1990), 207–219.
Gerla, G.: Distances, diameters and verisimilitude of theories, Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (1992), 407–414.
Gerla, G.: Pointless geometries, in F. Buekenhout and W. Kantor (eds.), Handbook of Incidence Geometry: Buildings and Foundations, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 1015–1031.
Gerla, G.: Fuzzy Logic: Mathematical Tools for Approximate Reasoning, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.
Hilpinen, R.: Approximate truth and truthlikeness, in M. Przelecki, K. Szaniawski, and R. Wcicki (eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Vol. 103, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987, pp. 19–42.
De Bouve, L. K.: Remarks on classification of theories by their complete extensions, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (1969), 1–17.
Miller, D.: Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1974), 166–177.
Miller, D.: On distance from the truth as a true distance, in J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto, and E. Saarinen (eds.), Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, Vol. 122, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, 415–435.
Niiniluoto, I.: Is Science Progressive? Vol. 177, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.
Niiniluoto, I.: Truthlikeness, Vol. 185, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.
Oddie, Graham: “Truthlikeness,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/truthlikeness/>.
Popper, K. R.: Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge, London, 1963.
Popper, K. R.: Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979.
Ryan, M. and Schobbens, P.: Belief revision and verisimilitude, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (1995), 15–29.
Tichy, P.: On Popper’s definitions of verisimilitude, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1974), 155–188.
Whitehead, A. N.: An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge, University Press, Cambridge, 1919.
Whitehead, A. N.: The Concept of Nature, University Press, Cambridge, 1920.
Whitehead, A. N.: Process and Reality, McMillian, New York, 1929.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerla, G. Point-Free Geometry and Verisimilitude of Theories. J Philos Logic 36, 707–733 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9059-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9059-x