Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Notes on the History of Ideas Behind AGM

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alchourròn, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alchourròn, C. E., & Makinson, D. (1981). Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New studies in Deontic logic (pp. 125–148). Reidel: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alchourròn, C. E., & Makinson, D. (1982). On the logic of theory change: contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria, 48, 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Darwiche, A., & Pearl, J. (1997). On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence, 89(1–2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R., Ullman, J. D., & Vardi, M. Y. (1983). On the semantics of updates in databases. Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGACT SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS'83), pp 352–365.

  6. Gärdenfors, P. (1979). Conditionals and changes of belief. In I. Niiniluoto & R. Tuomela (Eds.), The logic and epistemology of scientific change (pp. 381–404). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gärdenfors, P. (1980). A pragmatic approach to explanations. Philosophy of Science, 47, 404–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gärdenfors, P. (1982a). Rules for rational changes of belief. In: T. Pauli (ed.), <320311>: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Lennart Åqvist on His Fiftieth Birthday, Philosophical Studies published by the Phil. Society and The Dept. of Phil., Uppsala University, No. 34, Uppsala, pp 88–101.

  9. Gärdenfors, P. (1982). Imaging and conditionalization. Journal of Philosophy, 79, 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gärdenfors, P. (1984). Epistemic importance and minimal changes of belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62, 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gärdenfors, P. (1986). Belief revisions and the Ramsey test for conditionals. Philosophical Review, 95, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gärdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge: Bradford Books, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gärdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1994). Nonmonotonic inferences based on expectations. Artificial Intelligence, 65, 197–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gärdenfors, P., & Rott, H. (1995). Belief revision. In D. M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. 4, pp. 35–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grove, A. (1988). Two modellings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson, B. (1975). Explanations—of what? manuscript, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University.

  17. Hansson, S. O. (1992). A dyadic representation of belief. In P. Gärdenfors (Ed.), Belief revision (pp. 89–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansson, S. O. (1993). Theory contraction and base contraction unified. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58, 602–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harper, W. L. (1977). “Rational conceptual change”, in PSA 1976, East Lansing. Mich: Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 462–494.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harper, W. L. (1978). Bayesian learning models with revision of evidence. Philosophia, 7, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsuno, H., & Mendelzon, A. O. (1989). A unified view of propositional knowledge base updates, 2 Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 269–276). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levi, I. (1977). The enterprise of knowledge. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levi, I. (1991). The fixation of belief and its undoing: Changing beliefs through inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Makinson, D. (1987). On the status of the postulate of recovery and the logic of theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16, 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Makinson, D. (1996). In memoriam Carlos Eduardo Alchourrón. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Makinson, D. (2003). Ways of doing logic: What was different about AGM 1985? Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Makinson, D., & Gärdenfors, P. (1990). Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic. In A. Fuhrmann & M. Morreau (Eds.), The logic of theory change (pp. 185–205). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramsey, F. P. (1950). Foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rott, H. (2001). Change, choice and inference: A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Spohn, W. (1988). Ordinal conditional functions. In W. L. Harper & B. Skyrms (Eds.), Causation in decision, belief change, and statistics (Vol. II, pp. 105–134). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Studies in logical theory (pp. 98–112). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lund University Cognitive Science, Kungshuset, Lundagård, Lund, SE-222 22, Sweden

    Peter Gärdenfors

Authors
  1. Peter Gärdenfors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Gärdenfors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gärdenfors, P. Notes on the History of Ideas Behind AGM. J Philos Logic 40, 115–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9174-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9174-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation