Abstract
It is proved that a strong instance of the guessing principle \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}\) on the first uncountable cardinal follows from either the principle , or the principle \(\diamondsuit (\mathfrak b)\), or the existence of a Luzin set. In particular, any of the above hypotheses entails the existence of a Dowker space of size \(\aleph _1\).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See [7, §6]: for \(\lambda \) regular, \({\mathfrak {b}}_\lambda ={\mathfrak {d}}_\lambda =\kappa \) implies that \({\textsf {unbounded}}([\lambda ]^\lambda ,J^{{\textrm{bd}}}[\kappa ],\lambda )\) holds.
A similar idea can be found in an unpublished proof by Galvin from the late 1970’s of a theorem of Taylor.
References
Z.T. Balogh, A small Dowker space in ZFC. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124(8), 2555–2560 (1996)
W. Chen, S. Garti, T. Weinert, Cardinal characteristics of the continuum and partitions. Isr. J. Math. 235(1), 13–38 (2020)
J. Cummings, S. Shelah, Cardinal invariants above the continuum. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 75, 251–268 (1995). (math.LO/9509228)
P. de Caux, A collectionwise normal weakly \(\theta \)-refinable Dowker space which is neither irreducible nor realcompact, in Topology Proceedings, Vol. I (Conf., Auburn Univ., Auburn, Ala., 1976), pp. 67–77 (1977)
C.H. Dowker, On countably paracompact spaces. Can. J. Math. 3, 219–224 (1951)
C. Good, Large cardinals and small Dowker spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 123(1), 263–272 (1995)
T. Inamdar, A. Rinot, As Ulam right? II: small width and general ideals. http://assafrinot.com/paper/53 (2022). (Submitted March 2022)
I. Juhász, K. Kunen, M.E. Rudin, Two more hereditarily separable non-Lindelöf spaces. Can. J. Math. 28(5), 998–1005 (1976)
M. Kojman, S. Shelah, A ZFC Dowker space in \(\aleph _{\omega +1}\): an application of PCF theory to topology. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 126(8), 2459–2465 (1998)
C. Lambie-Hanson, A. Rinot, Knaster and friends III: Subadditive colorings. J. Symb. Logic (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2022.50. (to appear)
J.T. Moore, M. Hrušák, M. Džamonja, Parametrized \(\diamondsuit \) principles. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 356(6), 2281–2306 (2004)
A. Rinot, R. Shalev, A guessing principle from a Souslin tree, with applications to topology. Topol. Appl. 323(C), 29 (2023). (Paper No. 108296)
M.E. Rudin, Souslin trees, Dowker spaces, in Topics in Topology (Proc. Colloq., Keszthely, 1972). Colloqium Mathematical Society, János Bolyai, vol. 8, pp. 557–562 (1974)
M.E. Rudin, Some conjectures, in Open Problems in Topology, pp. 183–193. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)
M.E. Rudin, A normal space \(X\) for which \(X\times I\) is not normal. Fund. Math. 73(2):179–186 (1971/72)
S. Shelah, Models with second order properties. IV. A general method and eliminating diamonds. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 25, 183–212 (1983)
S. Shelah, The generalized continuum hypothesis revisited. Isr. J. Math. 116, 285–321 (2000)
S. Shelah, Diamonds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 2151–2161 (2010). (0711.3030)
P.J. Szeptycki, A Dowker space from a Lusin set. Topol. Appl. 58(2), 173–179 (1994)
S. Todorčević, Partition Problems in Topology, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 84 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1989)
S. Todorcevic, Walks on Ordinals and Their Characteristics, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 263 (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2007)
W. Weiss, Small Dowker spaces. Pac. J. Math. 94(2), 485–492 (1981)
Acknowledgements
The first author is partially supported by the European Research Council (grant agreement ERC-2018-StG 802756) and by the Israel Science Foundation (grant agreement 203/22). The second author is supported by the European Research Council (grant agreement ERC-2018-StG 802756). The third author is partially supported by grants from NSERC (455916), CNRS (IMJ-PRG UMR7586) and SFRS (7750027-SMART).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Many Dowker spaces
Appendix: Many Dowker spaces
In this section, \(\kappa \) denotes a regular uncountable cardinal. By [12, §3], if \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}({\mathcal {S}},1,2)\) holds for a partition \({\mathcal {S}}\) of some nonreflecting stationary subset of \(\kappa \) into infinitely many stationary sets, then there exists a Dowker space of size \(\kappa \). Here, we demonstrate the advantage of \({\mathcal {S}}\) being large.
Theorem A.1
Suppose that \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}({\mathcal {S}},1,2)\) holds, where \({\mathcal {S}}\) is a partition of a nonreflecting stationary subset of \(\kappa \) into infinitely many stationary sets. Denote \(\mu :=|{\mathcal {S}}|\). Then there are \(2^\mu \) many pairwise nonhomeomorphic Dowker spaces of size \(\kappa \).
Proof
Fix an injective enumeration \(\langle S^\zeta _{n}\mid \zeta<\mu , n<\omega \rangle \) of the elements of \({\mathcal {S}}\). As \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}({\mathcal {S}},1,2)\) holds, we may fix a sequence \(\langle A_{\alpha }\mid \alpha \in \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\rangle \) such that
-
(i)
for every \(\alpha \in \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\), \(A_\alpha \) is a subset of \(\alpha \), and for every \(\alpha '\in \alpha \cap \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\), \(\sup (A_{\alpha '}\cap A_\alpha )<\alpha '\);
-
(ii)
for all \(B_0,B_1\in [\kappa ]^{\kappa }\) and \((\zeta ,n)\in \mu \times \omega \), the following set is stationary:
$$\begin{aligned} G(S^\zeta _n,B_0,B_1):=\{\alpha \in S^\zeta _n\mid \sup (A_\alpha \cap B_0)=\sup (A_\alpha \cap B_1)=\alpha \}. \end{aligned}$$
For every nonempty \(Z\subseteq \mu \), we shall want to define a topological space \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\). To this end, fix a nonempty \(Z\subseteq \mu \). For every \(n<\omega \), let \(S^Z_{n+1}:=\biguplus _{\zeta \in Z}S^\zeta _{n+1}\), and then let \(S^Z_0:=\kappa \setminus \biguplus _{n<\omega } S^Z_{n+1}\). For every \(\alpha <\kappa \), let \(n^Z(\alpha )\) denote the unique \(n<\omega \) such that \(\alpha \in S^Z_n\). For each \(n<\omega \), let \( W^Z_n:=\bigcup _{i\le n}S^Z_i \). Then, define a sequence \(\vec {L^{Z}}=\langle L^Z_\alpha \mid \alpha <\kappa \rangle \) via
Denote \(S^Z:=\{ \alpha \in {{\,\textrm{acc}\,}}(\kappa )\mid \sup (L^Z_\alpha )=\alpha \}\). Finally, let \({\mathbb {X}}^Z=(\kappa ,\tau ^Z)\) be the ladder-system space determined by \(\vec {L^{Z}}\), that is, a subset \(U\subseteq \kappa \) is \(\tau ^Z\)-open iff, for every \(\alpha \in U\cap S^Z\), \(\sup (L^Z_\alpha \setminus U)<\alpha \).
Claim A.1.1
Let Z and \(Z'\) be nonempty subsets of \(\mu \). Then
-
(1)
for all \(n<\omega \) and \(\alpha \in S^Z_{n+1}\), \(L^Z_\alpha \subseteq W^Z_n\);
-
(2)
if \(Z\setminus Z'\) is nonempty, then \(S^Z\setminus S^{Z'}\) is stationary;
-
(3)
for all \(\alpha \ne \alpha '\) from \(S^Z\), \(\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap L^Z_{\alpha '})<\alpha \);
-
(4)
for all \(B_0,B_1\in [\kappa ]^\kappa \), there exists \(m<\omega \) such that, for every \(n\in \omega \setminus m\), the following set is stationary:
$$\begin{aligned} \{ \alpha \in S^Z_n \mid \sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap B_0)=\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap B_1)=\alpha \};\end{aligned}$$ -
(5)
\(S^Z\) is a nonreflecting stationary set.
Proof
(1) Clear.
(2) Suppose that \(Z\setminus Z'\ne \emptyset \), and pick \(\zeta \in Z{\setminus } Z'\). As \(W^Z_0=S^Z_0\supseteq S^\zeta _0\), the former set is cofinal. So, \(S^Z\setminus S^{Z'}\) covers the stationary set \(G(S^\zeta _1,W^Z_0,\kappa )\).
(3) For all \(\alpha \ne \alpha '\) from \(S^Z\), \(\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap L^Z_{\alpha '})\le \sup (A_\alpha \cap A_{\alpha '})<\alpha \).
(4) Pick \(\zeta \in Z\). Given two cofinal subsets \(B_0,B_1\) of \(\kappa \), find \(m_0,m_1<\omega \) such that \(|B_0\cap S^Z_{m_0}|=|B_1\cap S^Z_{m_1}|=\kappa \). Set \(m:=\max \{m_0,m_1\}+1\). Then, for every \(n\in \omega \setminus m\),
and hence the latter set is stationary.
(5) By Clause (4), \(S^Z\) is stationary. As \(S^Z\subseteq \bigcup _{n<\omega }S^Z_{n+1}\subseteq \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\), and since \(\bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\) is a nonreflecting stationary set, so is \(S^Z\). \(\square \)
By the preceding claim, and the results of [12, §3], for every nonempty \(Z\subseteq \mu \), \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\) is a Dowker space. Thus, what is left is to prove the following:
Claim A.1.2
Suppose that Z and \(Z'\) are two distinct nonempty subsets of \(\mu \). Then \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\) and \({\mathbb {X}}^{Z'}\) are not homeomorphic.
Proof
Without loss of generality, we may pick \(\zeta \in Z\setminus Z'\). Toward a contradiction, suppose that \(f:\kappa \leftrightarrow \kappa \) forms a homeomorphism from \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\) to \({\mathbb {X}}^{Z'}\). As f is a bijection, there are club many \(\alpha <\kappa \) such that \(f^{-1}[\alpha ]=\alpha \). By Claim A.1.1(2), then, we may pick some \(\alpha \in S^Z\setminus S^{Z'}\) such that \(f^{-1}[\alpha ]=\alpha \). Set \(\beta :=f(\alpha )\).
\(\blacktriangleright \) If \(\beta \notin S^{Z'}\), then \(U:=\{\beta \}\) is a \(\tau ^{Z'}\)-open neighborhood of \(\beta \).
\(\blacktriangleright \) If \(\beta \in S^{Z'}\), then \(\beta >\alpha +1\) and the ordinal interval \(U:=[\alpha +1,\beta +1]\) is a \(\tau ^{Z'}\)-open neighborhood of \(\beta \).
In both cases, \(U\subseteq \kappa {\setminus }\alpha \), so that \(f^{-1}[U]\subseteq f^{-1}[\kappa {\setminus }\alpha ]=\kappa {\setminus }\alpha \). As f is continuous and U is a \(\tau ^{Z'}\)-open neighborhood of \(f(\alpha )\), \(f^{-1}[U]\) must be a \(\tau ^Z\)-open neighborhood of \(\alpha \), contradicting the fact that \(f^{-1}[U]\) is disjoint from \(L^Z_\alpha \). \(\square \)
This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rinot, A., Shalev, R. & Todorcevic, S. A new small Dowker space. Period Math Hung 88, 102–117 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-023-00541-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-023-00541-6