Skip to main content
Log in

A new small Dowker space

  • Published:
Periodica Mathematica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is proved that a strong instance of the guessing principle \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}\) on the first uncountable cardinal follows from either the principle , or the principle \(\diamondsuit (\mathfrak b)\), or the existence of a Luzin set. In particular, any of the above hypotheses entails the existence of a Dowker space of size \(\aleph _1\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See [7, §6]: for \(\lambda \) regular, \({\mathfrak {b}}_\lambda ={\mathfrak {d}}_\lambda =\kappa \) implies that \({\textsf {unbounded}}([\lambda ]^\lambda ,J^{{\textrm{bd}}}[\kappa ],\lambda )\) holds.

  2. A similar idea can be found in an unpublished proof by Galvin from the late 1970’s of a theorem of Taylor.

References

  1. Z.T. Balogh, A small Dowker space in ZFC. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124(8), 2555–2560 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Chen, S. Garti, T. Weinert, Cardinal characteristics of the continuum and partitions. Isr. J. Math. 235(1), 13–38 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Cummings, S. Shelah, Cardinal invariants above the continuum. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 75, 251–268 (1995). (math.LO/9509228)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. P. de Caux, A collectionwise normal weakly \(\theta \)-refinable Dowker space which is neither irreducible nor realcompact, in Topology Proceedings, Vol. I (Conf., Auburn Univ., Auburn, Ala., 1976), pp. 67–77 (1977)

  5. C.H. Dowker, On countably paracompact spaces. Can. J. Math. 3, 219–224 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Good, Large cardinals and small Dowker spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 123(1), 263–272 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Inamdar, A. Rinot, As Ulam right? II: small width and general ideals. http://assafrinot.com/paper/53 (2022). (Submitted March 2022)

  8. I. Juhász, K. Kunen, M.E. Rudin, Two more hereditarily separable non-Lindelöf spaces. Can. J. Math. 28(5), 998–1005 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kojman, S. Shelah, A ZFC Dowker space in \(\aleph _{\omega +1}\): an application of PCF theory to topology. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 126(8), 2459–2465 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Lambie-Hanson, A. Rinot, Knaster and friends III: Subadditive colorings. J. Symb. Logic (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2022.50. (to appear)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J.T. Moore, M. Hrušák, M. Džamonja, Parametrized \(\diamondsuit \) principles. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 356(6), 2281–2306 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Rinot, R. Shalev, A guessing principle from a Souslin tree, with applications to topology. Topol. Appl. 323(C), 29 (2023). (Paper No. 108296)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M.E. Rudin, Souslin trees, Dowker spaces, in Topics in Topology (Proc. Colloq., Keszthely, 1972). Colloqium Mathematical Society, János Bolyai, vol. 8, pp. 557–562 (1974)

  14. M.E. Rudin, Some conjectures, in Open Problems in Topology, pp. 183–193. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

  15. M.E. Rudin, A normal space \(X\) for which \(X\times I\) is not normal. Fund. Math. 73(2):179–186 (1971/72)

  16. S. Shelah, Models with second order properties. IV. A general method and eliminating diamonds. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 25, 183–212 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Shelah, The generalized continuum hypothesis revisited. Isr. J. Math. 116, 285–321 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Shelah, Diamonds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 2151–2161 (2010). (0711.3030)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. P.J. Szeptycki, A Dowker space from a Lusin set. Topol. Appl. 58(2), 173–179 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Todorčević, Partition Problems in Topology, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 84 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Todorcevic, Walks on Ordinals and Their Characteristics, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 263 (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Weiss, Small Dowker spaces. Pac. J. Math. 94(2), 485–492 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is partially supported by the European Research Council (grant agreement ERC-2018-StG 802756) and by the Israel Science Foundation (grant agreement 203/22). The second author is supported by the European Research Council (grant agreement ERC-2018-StG 802756). The third author is partially supported by grants from NSERC (455916), CNRS (IMJ-PRG UMR7586) and SFRS (7750027-SMART).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assaf Rinot.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Many Dowker spaces

Appendix: Many Dowker spaces

In this section, \(\kappa \) denotes a regular uncountable cardinal. By [12, §3], if \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}({\mathcal {S}},1,2)\) holds for a partition \({\mathcal {S}}\) of some nonreflecting stationary subset of \(\kappa \) into infinitely many stationary sets, then there exists a Dowker space of size \(\kappa \). Here, we demonstrate the advantage of \({\mathcal {S}}\) being large.

Theorem A.1

Suppose that \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}({\mathcal {S}},1,2)\) holds, where \({\mathcal {S}}\) is a partition of a nonreflecting stationary subset of \(\kappa \) into infinitely many stationary sets. Denote \(\mu :=|{\mathcal {S}}|\). Then there are \(2^\mu \) many pairwise nonhomeomorphic Dowker spaces of size \(\kappa \).

Proof

Fix an injective enumeration \(\langle S^\zeta _{n}\mid \zeta<\mu , n<\omega \rangle \) of the elements of \({\mathcal {S}}\). As \(\clubsuit _{{{\,\textrm{AD}\,}}}({\mathcal {S}},1,2)\) holds, we may fix a sequence \(\langle A_{\alpha }\mid \alpha \in \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\rangle \) such that

  1. (i)

    for every \(\alpha \in \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\), \(A_\alpha \) is a subset of \(\alpha \), and for every \(\alpha '\in \alpha \cap \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\), \(\sup (A_{\alpha '}\cap A_\alpha )<\alpha '\);

  2. (ii)

    for all \(B_0,B_1\in [\kappa ]^{\kappa }\) and \((\zeta ,n)\in \mu \times \omega \), the following set is stationary:

    $$\begin{aligned} G(S^\zeta _n,B_0,B_1):=\{\alpha \in S^\zeta _n\mid \sup (A_\alpha \cap B_0)=\sup (A_\alpha \cap B_1)=\alpha \}. \end{aligned}$$

For every nonempty \(Z\subseteq \mu \), we shall want to define a topological space \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\). To this end, fix a nonempty \(Z\subseteq \mu \). For every \(n<\omega \), let \(S^Z_{n+1}:=\biguplus _{\zeta \in Z}S^\zeta _{n+1}\), and then let \(S^Z_0:=\kappa \setminus \biguplus _{n<\omega } S^Z_{n+1}\). For every \(\alpha <\kappa \), let \(n^Z(\alpha )\) denote the unique \(n<\omega \) such that \(\alpha \in S^Z_n\). For each \(n<\omega \), let \( W^Z_n:=\bigcup _{i\le n}S^Z_i \). Then, define a sequence \(\vec {L^{Z}}=\langle L^Z_\alpha \mid \alpha <\kappa \rangle \) via

$$ \begin{aligned} L^Z_\alpha :={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} W^Z_{n^Z(\alpha )-1}\cap A_\alpha ,&{}\text {if }n^Z(\alpha )>0\ \& \ \sup (W^Z_{n^Z(\alpha )-1}\cap A_\alpha )=\alpha ;\\ \emptyset ,&{}\text {otherwise.} \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$

Denote \(S^Z:=\{ \alpha \in {{\,\textrm{acc}\,}}(\kappa )\mid \sup (L^Z_\alpha )=\alpha \}\). Finally, let \({\mathbb {X}}^Z=(\kappa ,\tau ^Z)\) be the ladder-system space determined by \(\vec {L^{Z}}\), that is, a subset \(U\subseteq \kappa \) is \(\tau ^Z\)-open iff, for every \(\alpha \in U\cap S^Z\), \(\sup (L^Z_\alpha \setminus U)<\alpha \).

Claim A.1.1

Let Z and \(Z'\) be nonempty subsets of \(\mu \). Then

  1. (1)

    for all \(n<\omega \) and \(\alpha \in S^Z_{n+1}\), \(L^Z_\alpha \subseteq W^Z_n\);

  2. (2)

    if \(Z\setminus Z'\) is nonempty, then \(S^Z\setminus S^{Z'}\) is stationary;

  3. (3)

    for all \(\alpha \ne \alpha '\) from \(S^Z\), \(\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap L^Z_{\alpha '})<\alpha \);

  4. (4)

    for all \(B_0,B_1\in [\kappa ]^\kappa \), there exists \(m<\omega \) such that, for every \(n\in \omega \setminus m\), the following set is stationary:

    $$\begin{aligned} \{ \alpha \in S^Z_n \mid \sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap B_0)=\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap B_1)=\alpha \};\end{aligned}$$
  5. (5)

    \(S^Z\) is a nonreflecting stationary set.

Proof

(1) Clear.

(2) Suppose that \(Z\setminus Z'\ne \emptyset \), and pick \(\zeta \in Z{\setminus } Z'\). As \(W^Z_0=S^Z_0\supseteq S^\zeta _0\), the former set is cofinal. So, \(S^Z\setminus S^{Z'}\) covers the stationary set \(G(S^\zeta _1,W^Z_0,\kappa )\).

(3) For all \(\alpha \ne \alpha '\) from \(S^Z\), \(\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap L^Z_{\alpha '})\le \sup (A_\alpha \cap A_{\alpha '})<\alpha \).

(4) Pick \(\zeta \in Z\). Given two cofinal subsets \(B_0,B_1\) of \(\kappa \), find \(m_0,m_1<\omega \) such that \(|B_0\cap S^Z_{m_0}|=|B_1\cap S^Z_{m_1}|=\kappa \). Set \(m:=\max \{m_0,m_1\}+1\). Then, for every \(n\in \omega \setminus m\),

$$\begin{aligned} G(S_n^\zeta ,B_0\cap S^Z_{m_0},B_1\cap S^Z_{m_1})\subseteq \{ \alpha \in S^Z_n \mid \sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap B_0)=\sup (L^Z_\alpha \cap B_1)=\alpha \} \end{aligned}$$

and hence the latter set is stationary.

(5) By Clause (4), \(S^Z\) is stationary. As \(S^Z\subseteq \bigcup _{n<\omega }S^Z_{n+1}\subseteq \bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\), and since \(\bigcup {\mathcal {S}}\) is a nonreflecting stationary set, so is \(S^Z\). \(\square \)

By the preceding claim, and the results of [12, §3], for every nonempty \(Z\subseteq \mu \), \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\) is a Dowker space. Thus, what is left is to prove the following:

Claim A.1.2

Suppose that Z and \(Z'\) are two distinct nonempty subsets of \(\mu \). Then \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\) and \({\mathbb {X}}^{Z'}\) are not homeomorphic.

Proof

Without loss of generality, we may pick \(\zeta \in Z\setminus Z'\). Toward a contradiction, suppose that \(f:\kappa \leftrightarrow \kappa \) forms a homeomorphism from \({\mathbb {X}}^Z\) to \({\mathbb {X}}^{Z'}\). As f is a bijection, there are club many \(\alpha <\kappa \) such that \(f^{-1}[\alpha ]=\alpha \). By Claim A.1.1(2), then, we may pick some \(\alpha \in S^Z\setminus S^{Z'}\) such that \(f^{-1}[\alpha ]=\alpha \). Set \(\beta :=f(\alpha )\).

\(\blacktriangleright \) If \(\beta \notin S^{Z'}\), then \(U:=\{\beta \}\) is a \(\tau ^{Z'}\)-open neighborhood of \(\beta \).

\(\blacktriangleright \) If \(\beta \in S^{Z'}\), then \(\beta >\alpha +1\) and the ordinal interval \(U:=[\alpha +1,\beta +1]\) is a \(\tau ^{Z'}\)-open neighborhood of \(\beta \).

In both cases, \(U\subseteq \kappa {\setminus }\alpha \), so that \(f^{-1}[U]\subseteq f^{-1}[\kappa {\setminus }\alpha ]=\kappa {\setminus }\alpha \). As f is continuous and U is a \(\tau ^{Z'}\)-open neighborhood of \(f(\alpha )\), \(f^{-1}[U]\) must be a \(\tau ^Z\)-open neighborhood of \(\alpha \), contradicting the fact that \(f^{-1}[U]\) is disjoint from \(L^Z_\alpha \). \(\square \)

This completes the proof. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rinot, A., Shalev, R. & Todorcevic, S. A new small Dowker space. Period Math Hung 88, 102–117 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-023-00541-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-023-00541-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation