Abstract
This article focuses on the pendulum-like change in the way people read and use text, which was triggered by the introduction of new reading and writing technologies in human history. The paper argues that textual features, which characterized the ancient pre-print writing culture, disappeared with the establishment of the modern-day print culture and has been “revived” in the digital post-modern era. This claim is based on the analysis of four cases which demonstrate this textual-pendulum swing: (1) The swing from concrete iconic-graphic representation of letters and words in the ancient alphabet to abstract phonetic representation of text in modern eras, and from written abstract computer commands “back” to the concrete iconic representation in graphic user interfaces of the digital era; (2) The swing from scroll reading in the pre-print era to page or book reading in the print era and “back” to scroll reading in the digital era; (3) The swing from a low level of authorship in the pre-print era to a strong authorship perception in the print era, and “back” to a low degree of authorship in the digital era; (4) The swing from synchronic representation of text in both visual and audio formats during the pre-print era to a visual representation only in print, and “back” to a synchronic representation in many environments of the digital era. We suggest that the print culture, which is usually considered the natural and preferred textual environment, should be regarded as the exception.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspillaga, M. (1996). Perceptual foundations in the design of visual displays. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(4), 587–600. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00028-3.
Barthes, R. (2005). La mort de l’auteur. Tel Aviv: Resling (in Hebrew).
Birkerts, S. (2004). The fate of reading in an electronic age. Boston: Faber and Faber.
Briggs, A., & Burke, P. (2005). A social history of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Carrington, V. (2005). The uncanny, digital texts and literacy. Language & Education: An International Journal, 19(6), 467–482.
Chaytor, J. H. (1950). From script to print: An introduction to medieval vernacular literature. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.
Diringer, D., & Regenburger, R. (1968). Alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. Berlin: Funk & Wagnalls.
Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M., & Heigl, R. (2006). Wiki: Web collaboration. Berlin: Springer.
Eisenstein, E. (2005). The printing revolution in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Chajut, E. (2007). Living books: The incidental bonus of playing with multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(4), 377–388.
Ferdinand, P. (2000). The Internet, democracy and democratization. NY: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2005). Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur? Tel Aviv: Resling (in Hebrew).
Gelb, I. J. (1963). A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39–53.
Katsh, M. E. (1989). The electronic media and the transformation of law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lanham, R. (1995). Digital literacy. Scientific American, 273, 253–255.
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2001). The open source movement: Key research questions. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 819–826. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00124-6.
Lessig, L. (2002). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.
Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki way: quick collaboration on the Web. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
Lewin, C. (2000). Exploring the effects of talking book software in UK primary classrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 149–158. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00111.
Litman, J. (2006). Digital copyright. Michigan: Prometheus Books.
McLuhan, M. (1968). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Miller, N. (2005). Wikipedia and the disappearing author. Etc.; A Review of General Semantics, 62(1), 37–40.
Morrison, K. F. (1990). History as a visual art in the twelfth-century renaissance. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nielsen, J., & Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage usability. New York: New Riders Publishing.
Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper. London: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, J. W. (1982). Interfaces of the word: Studies in the evolution of consciousness and culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ong, J. W. (1995). Print, space, and closure. In D. Crowly & P. Heyer (Eds.), Communication in history: Technology, culture, society (pp. 114–124). New York: Longman.
Park, C. (2003). In other (People’s) words: Plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. doi:10.1080/02602930301677.
Pemberton, L., Fallahkhair, S., & Masthoff, J. (2004). Towards a theoretical framework for informal language learning via interactive television. In D. Kinshuk, G. Sampson & P. Isaias (Eds.), Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (CELDA 2004) (pp. 27–34). Lisbon: IADIS Press.
Pool, C. R. (1997). A new digital literacy: A conversation with Paul Gilster. Educational Leadership, 55, 6–11.
Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Quinn, S., & Stark-Adam, P. (2007). What are the differences in reading news in print and online? The Poynteronline, April, 2007. Retrieved March, 2008, http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=105035.
Raymond, E. S. (2003). The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musing on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. ATM Software Solutions. Cambridge: O’reilly.
Rose, M. (1988). The author as proprietor: Donaldson vs. Becket and the genealogy of modern authorship. Representations (Berkeley, Calif.), 23, 51–85. doi:10.1525/rep.1988.23.1.99p0230p.
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface. Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.
Singleton, C., Thomas, K., & Horne, J. (2000). Computer-based cognitive assessment and the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 158–181. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00112.
Snyder, I. (1999). Digital literacies: Renegotiating the visual and the verbal in communication. Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL, 14(3), 13–23.
Soffer, O. (2005). The textual pendulum. Communication Theory, 15, 266–291. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00336.x.
Spencer, C. (2006). Research on learners’ preferences for reading from a printed text or from a computer screen. Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 33–50.
Traub, C. H., & Lipkin, J. (2004). In the realm of the circuit: Computers, art and culture. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
Underwood, G., & Underwood, J. D. M. (1998). Children’s interactions and learning outcomes with interactive talking books. Computers & Education, 30(1–2), 95–102. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00084-5.
Van Der Merwe, D. (1999). The dematerialization of print and the fate of copyright. International Review of Law Computers, 13(3), 303–315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soffer, O., Eshet-Alkalai, Y. Back to the Future: An Historical Perspective on the Pendulum-Like Changes in Literacy. Minds & Machines 19, 47–59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-008-9119-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-008-9119-1