Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sense and Reference on the Web

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine a crucial question for the World Wide Web: What does a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) mean? Crucial for the next-generation Semantic Web, can it refer to things outside web-pages? The Web is a universal information space for naming and accessing information via URIs. However, the classical philosophical problems of meaning and reference that have been the source of debate within the philosophy of language return when the Web is given as the foundation for a knowledge representation with the Semantic Web. Debates on the Semantic Web about the meaning and referential status of a URI are explored as analogues to debates about the meaning and reference of names in the philosophy of language. Three main positions are inspected: the logical position, as exemplified by the descriptivist theory of reference, the direct reference position, as exemplified by Putnam and Kripke’s causal theory of reference, and a Wittgensteinian position that views URIs as a public language, as exemplified by Web search engines. These positions show that debates within the philosophy of language are alive and well on the Web, and so in the philosophy of computer science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckett, D., & Berners-Lee, T. (2008). Turtle—Terse RDF triple language. Member submission, W3C.

  • Berners-Lee, T. (1994). World Wide Web future directions. Plenary Talk. http://www.w3.org/Talks/WWW94Tim/. Last accessed on October 5, 2008.

  • Berners-Lee, T. (1998). Cool URIs don’t change. http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI. Last accessed on November 19, 2008.

  • Berners-Lee, T. (2003a). Message on www-tag@w3.org list. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0158.html. Last accessed on May 20, 2008.

  • Berners-Lee, T. (2003b). Message to www-tag@w3.org. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html. Last accessed on May 20, 2008.

  • Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., & Masinter, L. (1998). IETF RFC 2396 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic syntax. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt. Last accessed on September 15, 2008.

  • Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., & Masinter, L. (2005). IETF RFC 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic syntax. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt. Last accessed on April 2, 2008.

  • Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW) (pp. 107–117). Brisbane, Australia.

  • Carnap, R. (1928). The logical structure of the world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Republished in 1967).

  • Dummett, M. (1993). What is a theory of meaning. In The seas of language (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in Truth and meaning: Essays in semantics in 1976).

  • Frege, G. (1892). Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitshrift fur Philosophie and philosophie Kritic, 100, 25–50. (Reprinted in The philosophical writings of Gottlieb Frege (1956). Oxford: Blackwell. Max Black, Trans.).

  • Grice, P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. V., & Lenat, D. (1992). Language, representation and contexts. Journal of Information Processing, 15(3), 340–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. V. (1996). Meta Content Framework: A white paper. http://www.guha.com/mcf/wp.html. Last accessed August 11, 2008.

  • Halpin, H., & Lavrenko, V. (2009). Relevance feedback between hypertext search and semantic search. In Proceedings of the Semantic Search Workshop at the World Wide Web Conference. Madrid, Spain.

  • Halpin, H., & Thompson, H. (2005). Web Proper Names: Naming referents on the web. In Proceedings of the Semantic Computing Initiative Workshop at the World Wide Web Conference. Chiba, Japan.

  • Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P. (1977). In defense of logic. In Proceedings of international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 559–565). Cambridge, MA.

  • Hayes, P. (2003a). Message to www-rdf-comments@w3.org. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0147.html. Last accessed on May 20, 2008.

  • Hayes, P. (2003b). Message to www-rdf-comments@w3.org. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0198.html. Last accessed on May 20, 2008.

  • Hayes, P. (2004). RDF semantics. Recommendation, W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/. Last accessed September 21, 2008.

  • Hayes, P. (2006). In defense of ambiguity. In Proceedings of the identity, reference, and the web workshop at the WWW conference. Edinburgh, Scotland. http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/hayes.pdf. Last accessed on October 5, 2008.

  • Hayes, P., & Halpin, H. (2008). In defense of ambiguity. International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems, 4(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. S. (1964). Synonymy and semantic classification. Thesis, Cambridge University. (Republished in 1984 by Edinburgh University Press).

  • Jones, K. S. (1999). Information retrieval and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 114, 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F., & Lapata, M. (2003). Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computional Linguistics, 29(3), 459–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luntley, M. (1999). Contemporary philosophy of thought. London, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R. (1962). A method for using computers in information classification. In Proceedings of the IFIP congress (pp. 284–287). Vienna, Austria.

  • Oren, E., Delbru, R., Catasta, M., Cyganiak, R., Stenzhorn, H., & Tummarello, G. (2008). Sindice.com: A document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics, and Ontologies, 3(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of meaning. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. (1995). The origin of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. (2006). Review of Language, Cohesion, and Form by Margaret Masterman. Computational Linguistics, 4(32), 551–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1935). The concept of truth in formalized languages. Studia Philosophia, 1:261–405. (Reprinted in Logic, semantics and metamathematics (1956). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. J. H. Woodger Trans.).

  • Tarski, A. (1944). The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4, 341–375.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, Y. (2005). A personal memoir: Margaret Masterman (1910–1986). In M. Masterman (Ed.), Language cohesion and form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, Y. (2007). Karen Spärck Jones (1935–2007). IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(3), 8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, Y. (2008a). The semantic web: Apotheosis of annotation, but what are its semantics? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(3), 41–49.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, Y. (2008b). What would a Wittgensteinian computational linguistics be like? In Proceedings of convention for the society for the study of artificial intelligence and simulation of behavior. Aberdeen, Scotland.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. London, UK: Blackwell Publishers. (Republished 2001, Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe).

  • Woods, W. (1975). What’s in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35–82). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the many fruitful conversations I’ve had on these topics with Tim Berners-Lee and Pat Hayes that revealed the fundamentally philosophical nature of their disagreement, as well as the encouragement and comments received when this work has been presented in public, both at the ‘Identity, Reference, and the Web’ workshop at the World Wide Web Conference and at the North American Philosophy and Computing Conference. In particular, substantial comments from Henry S. Thompson and Yorick Wilks have been worked into the text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK

    Harry Halpin

Authors
  1. Harry Halpin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Halpin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halpin, H. Sense and Reference on the Web. Minds & Machines 21, 153–178 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9230-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9230-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation