Skip to main content
Log in

Intuition, Computation, and Information

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bynum (Putting information first: Luciano Floridi and the philosophy of information. NY: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010) identifies Floridi’s focus in the philosophy of information (PI) on entities both as data structures and as information objects. One suggestion for examining the association between the former and the latter stems from Floridi’s Herbert A. Simon Lecture in Computing and Philosophy given at Carnegie Mellon University in 2001, open problems in the PI: the transduction or transception, and how we gain knowledge about the world as a complex, living, information environment. This paper addresses PI across a model of interoperating levels: perception (P)—intuition (N)—computation (C)—information (I), as factored by cognitive continuity (1), temporality (2), and constitution (3). How might we begin to characterize our experience of an abstract information object across such a matrix? Chudnoff’s rationalist distinctions between perception and intuition serve as a first rung of the ladder. Turing’s brief references to the utility of intuition, in an allied, rationalist-Cartesian sense, provide the next step up to computation. Floridi provides the final link from computation to information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bynum, T. W. (2010). Philosophy in the Information Age. In P. Allo (Ed.), Putting information first: Luciano Floridi and the philosophy of information. NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudnoff, E. (forthcoming, 2013–2014), Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Floridi, L. (2004). Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy, 35(4), 554–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2005). Is semantic information meaningful data? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2006). The logic of being informed. Logique et Analyse, 49(196), 433–460.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2008). The method of levels of abstraction. Minds and Machines, 18(3), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, J. (2005). The R-theory of time, or replacement presentism: The Buddhist philosophy of time. Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 6, 51–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, K. (2003). An information continuum conjecture. Minds and Machines, 13(4), 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, Y. (2012). What is a digital object? Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 380–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, H. H. (1957). Descartes’s rules for the direction of the mind. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, J. (2012). A partial defense of intuition on naturalist grounds. Synthese, 187, 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M. (1937). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42(2), 230–265.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M. (1939). ‘Systems of logic based on ordinals. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 45(2), 161–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1914). Relativism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 11(21), 561–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Herold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herold, K. Intuition, Computation, and Information. Minds & Machines 24, 85–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-013-9324-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-013-9324-4

Keywords

Navigation