Abstract
The paper reviews the empirical evidence for highly significant variation across perceivers in hue perception and argues that color physicalism cannot accommodate this variability. Two views that can accommodate the individual differences in hue perception are considered: the self-locating property theory, according to which colors are self-locating properties, and color relationalism, according to which colors are relations to perceivers and viewing conditions. It is subsequently argued that on a plausible rendition of the two views, the self-locating theory has a slight advantage over color relationalism in being truer to the phenomenology of our color experiences.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
In their talk at the color and philosophy conference at Auburn University, March 2–3, 2012, Byrne and Hilbert used ‘color relativism’ as a label for my self-locating property theory and Jonathan Cohen’s relational theory. Elsewhere I have used the label ‘color relativism’ more narrowly for the self-locating property theory. See Brogaard (2012b). There are, of course, numerous other defenders of these or similar views of color. One that immediately comes to mind is Chirimuuta (2015). Chalmers (2006) defends a kind of color physicalism but takes the content of color perception to include self-locating properties.
Individuals and times cannot be chosen at random. For example, there is no centered world containing the time 2000 BC and me at the center, as I didn’t exist then.
See e.g., discussion here. http://notes-from-dreamworlds.blogspot.com/2013/06/fluorescent-colors-of-reef-coral.html.
Here I have in mind people who think that the phenomenology of perception is externalist and who think that high-level properties, like that of being water, is presented in perception.
Thanks to Mazviita Chirimuuta and an anonymous reviewer for very helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
References
Akins, K. (2001). More than mere coloring: A dialog between philosophy and neuroscience on the nature of spectral vision. In S. Fitzpatrick & J. T. Breur (Eds.), Carving our destiny. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Armstrong, D. (1961). Perception and the physical world. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Armstrong, D. (1968). A materialist theory of mind. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Averill, E. W. (1992). The Relational Nature of Color. The Philosophical Review, 101, 551–588.
Billock, V. A., Gleason, G. A., & Tsou, B. H. (2001). Perception of forbidden colours in retinally stabilized equiluminant images: an indication of softwired cortical colour opponency? Journal of the Optical Society of America A (Optical Society of America), 18, 2398–2403.
Block, N. (1990). Inverted Earth. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives (Vol. 4). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Block, N. (1996). Mental paint and mental latex. Philosophical Issues, 7, 19–49.
Block, N. (2010). Attention and mental paint. Philosophical Issues, 20(1), 23–63.
Bor, D., Billington, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Savant memory for digits in a case of synaesthesia and Asperger syndrome is related to hyperactivity in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Neurocase, 13, 311–319.
Brogaard, B. (2009). Color in the theory of colors? Or: Are philosophers’ colors all white? In G. Yancy (Ed.), The center must not hold: White women on the whiteness of philosophy (pp. 131–152). New York: Lexington Books.
Brogaard, B. (2010). Perspectival truth and color primitivism. In C. Wright & N. Pedersen (Eds.), New waves in truth (pp. 249–266). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brogaard, B. (2012a). Transient truths. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brogaard, B. (2012b). Colour eliminativism or colour relativism? Philosophical Papers, 41(2), 305–321.
Brogaard, B. (2013). Do we perceive natural kind properties? Philosophical Studies, 162(1), 35–42.
Brogaard, B. Manuscript, Seeing and Saying. Oxford University Press.
Brogaard, B., Vanni, S., & Silvanto, J. (2013). Seeing mathematics: Perceptual experience and brain activity in acquired synesthesia. Neurocase, 19(6), 566–575.
Byrne, A. (2006). Comments on Cohen, Mizrahi, Maund, and Levine. Dialectica, 60, 337–340.
Byrne, A., & Hilbert, D. R. (2003). Colour realism and colour science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 26, 3–21.
Chalmers, D. J. (2006). Perception and the fall from Eden. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 49–125). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Chirimuuta, M. (2015). Perceptual pragmatism and the secondary qualities. In Outside color: Perceptual science and the puzzle of color in philosophy, chap. 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J. (2009). The red and the real. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. (2010). Color relationalism and color phenomenology. In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world (pp. 13–32). New York: Oxford University Press.
Crane, H. D., & Piantanida, T. P. (1983). On seeing reddish green and yellowish blue. Science, 221, 1078–1080.
Dixon, M. J., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2004). Not all synaesthetes are created equal: Projector versus associator synaesthetes. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 335–343.
Hardin, C. L. (1985). Color for philosophers: Unweaving the rainbow (expanded ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Hilbert, D. (1987). Colour and colour perception: A study in anthropocentric realism. Stanford: CSLI.
Jameson, K. A. (2007). Tetrachromatic colour vision. In P. Wilken, T. Bayne, & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), The Oxford companion to consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jameson, K. A., Bimler, D., & Wasserman, L. M. (2006). Re-assessing perceptual diagnostics for observers with diverse retinal photopigment genotypes. In N. J. Pitchford & C. P. Biggam (Eds.), Progress in colour studies 2: Cognition (pp. 13–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Jameson, K. A., Highnote, S. M., & Wasserman, L. M. (2001). Richer colour experience in Observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 244–261.
Kuehni, R. G. (2001). Determination of unique hues using Munsell colour chips. Colour Research & Applications, 26, 61–66.
Lewis, D. (1979). Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review, 88, 513–543.
Malkoc, G., Kay, P., & Webster, M. A. (2005). Variations in normal colour vision. IV. Binary hues and hue scaling. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 22, 2154–2168.
Matthen, M. (1988). Biological function and perceptual content. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 5–27.
Perry, J. (1979). The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs, 13(1), 3–21.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341–423.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2003). The phenomenology of synaesthesia. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 49–57.
Siegel, S. (2005). Which properties are represented in perception? In T. Szabo Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 481–503). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stark, W. S. (1987). Photopic sensitivities to ultraviolet and visible wavelengths and the effects of the macular pigments in human aphakic observers. Current Eye Research, 6, 631–638.
Stark, W. S., Wagner, R. H., Gillespie, C. M. (1994). Ultraviolet sensitivity of three cone types in the aphakic observer determined by chromatic adaptation. Vision Research, 34, 1457–1459.
Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, colour, and content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Webster, M. A., Juricevic, I., & McDermott, K. C. (2010). Simulations of adaptation and color appearance in observers with varying spectral sensitivity. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 30(5), 602–610.
Webster, M. A., Miyahara, E., Malkoc, G., & Raker, V. E. (2000). Variations in normal color vision. II. Unique Hues. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 17, 1545–1555.
Webster, M. A., Webster, S. M., Bharadwaj, S., Verma, R., Jaikumar, J., Madan, G., & Vaithilingham, E. (2002). Variations in normal color vision. III. Unique hues in Indian and United States observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 19(10), 1951–1962.
Winderickx, J., Lindsey, D. T., Sanocki, E., Teller, D. Y., Motulsky, A. G., & Deeb, S. S. (1992). Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in colour matching. Nature, 356, 431–433.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brogaard, B. The Self-Locating Property Theory of Color. Minds & Machines 25, 133–147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9373-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9373-y