Skip to main content
Log in

WreckWatch: Automatic Traffic Accident Detection and Notification with Smartphones

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traffic accidents are one of the leading causes of fatalities in the US. An important indicator of survival rates after an accident is the time between the accident and when emergency medical personnel are dispatched to the scene. Eliminating the time between when an accident occurs and when first responders are dispatched to the scene decreases mortality rates by 6%. One approach to eliminating the delay between accident occurrence and first responder dispatch is to use in-vehicle automatic accident detection and notification systems, which sense when traffic accidents occur and immediately notify emergency personnel. These in-vehicle systems, however, are not available in all cars and are expensive to retrofit for older vehicles. This paper describes how smartphones, such as the iPhone and Google Android platforms, can automatically detect traffic accidents using accelerometers and acoustic data, immediately notify a central emergency dispatch server after an accident, and provide situational awareness through photographs, GPS coordinates, VOIP communication channels, and accident data recording. This paper provides the following contributions to the study of detecting traffic accidents via smartphones: (1) we present a formal model for accident detection that combines sensors and context data, (2) we show how smartphone sensors, network connections, and web services can be used to provide situational awareness to first responders, and (3) we provide empirical results demonstrating the efficacy of different approaches employed by smartphone accident detection systems to prevent false positives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Activities are basic building block components for Android applications and can be thought of as a “screen” or “view” that provide a single, focused thing a user can do.

References

  1. Alsliety M (2004) How does SDR fit the telematics model? Software defined radio forum workshop on software portability, Toronto, Canada, 15–17 June 2004

  2. Ap Taylor M (2001) Intelligent transport systems. Handbook of transport systems and traffic control, p 461

  3. Askland A (2006) Double edged sword that is the event data recorder. The Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 25:1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blandford A, William Wong BL (2004) Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch. Int J Human-Comput Stud 61(4):421–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Champion HR, Augenstein J, Blatt AJ, Cushing B, Digges K, Siegel JH, Flanigan MC (2004) Automatic crash notification and the URGENCY algorithm: its history, value, and use. AEN 26(2):143

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chris T, White J, Dougherty B, Albright A, Schmidt DC (2010) Using smartphones and wireless mobile networks to detect car accidents and provide situational awareness to emergency responders. In: Third international ICST conference on mobile wireless middleWARE, operating systems, and applications (Mobilware 2010), Chicago, IL., 30 June–2 July 2010

  7. Cohen A, Einav L (2003) The effects of mandatory seat belt laws on driving behavior and traffic fatalities. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):828–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn JP (2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience 58(3):192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. HFES 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evanco W (1996) The impact of rapid incident detection on freeway accident fatalities. Mitretek Systems, Inc., WN96W0000071

  11. Fildes B, Newstead S, Barnes JS, Morris AP (2001) Airbag effectiveness in real world crashes. Road safety research, policing and education, Australian Transport Council

  12. Green P (2000) Crashes induced by driver information systems and what can be done to reduce them. In: SAE conference proceedings, SAE 1999, pp 27–36

  13. Groesch L, Netzer G, Kassing L (1987) Dummy for car crash testing, 20 October 1987. US Patent 4,701,132

  14. Harrald J, Jefferson T (2007) Shared situational awareness in emergency management mitigation and response. In: 40th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. IEEE, p 23

  15. Ichikawa F, Chipchase J, Grignani R (2005) Where’s the phone? A study of mobile phone location in public spaces. In: Proc. IEE mobility conference 2005. Citeseer

  16. Jones WD (2001) Forecasting traffic flow. IEEE Spectrum 38(1):90–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knaian AN (2000) A wireless sensor network for smart roadbeds and intelligent transportation systems. PhD thesis, Citeseer

  18. Lenhart A (2009) Teens and mobile phones over the past five years: pew internet looks back. Pew Internet & American Life Project

  19. Lie A, Tingvall C, Krafft M, Kullgren A (2006) The effectiveness of electronic stability control (ESC) in reducing real life crashes and injuries. Traffic Injury Prevent 7(1):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mellander H, Nilsson S, Warner CY, Wille MG, Koch M (1987) Load-sensing faceform for crash dummy instrumentation. US Patent 4,691,556, 8 September 1987

  21. Mohan P, Padmanabhan VN, Ramjee R (2008) Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on embedded network sensor systems. ACM, New York, pp 323–336

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1999) Federal motor vehicle safety standards: occupant crash protection—supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking

  23. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (2008) 2007 Traffic safety annual assessment—highlights

  24. Naunheim RS, Standeven J, Richter C, Lewis LM (2000) Comparison of impact data in hockey, football, and soccer. J Trauma 48(5):938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Query WIS (0000) Reporting system (WISQARS). National center for injury prevention and control, centers for disease control and prevention (producer). Available from: URL: www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars

  26. Rauscher S, Messner G, Baur P, Augenstein J, Digges K, Perdeck E, Bahouth G, Pieske O (2009) Enhanced automatic collision notification system- improved rescue care due to injury prediction- first field experience

  27. Rickns M (2010) Idg news service. http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobilize/android-big-winner-smartphone-sales-increase-50-percent-710. Accessed 12 Dec 2010

  28. Rose G (2006) Mobile phones as traffic probes: practices, prospects and issues. Transp Rev 26(3):275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sampson R (2004) Misuse and abuse of 911. US Department of Justice, August 2004. http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/e07042423_web.pdf

  30. Saunders JE, Slattery III WH, Luxford WM (1998) Automobile airbag impulse noise: otologic symptoms in six patients. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 118(2):228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trbovich P, Harbluk JL (2003) Cell phone communication and driver visual behavior: the impact of cognitive distraction. In: CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, p 729.

  32. Varney NR, Varney RN (1995) Brain injury without head injury. Some physics of automobile collisions with particular reference to brain injuries occurring without physical head trauma. Appl Neuropsychol 2(2):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Verma M, Lange R, McGarry D (2007) A study Of US crash statistics from automated crash notification data. In 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles conference (ESV). Lyon, france, 18–21 June 2007

  34. Weiland RJ, Purser LB (2009) Intelligent transportation systems. Transp Res 1:40AM

    Google Scholar 

  35. Young RA (2001) Association between embedded cellular phone calls and vehicle crashes involving airbag deployment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design. Aspen, CO, pp 390–400

  36. Zhao Y (2000) Mobile phone location determination and its impact on intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 1(1):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation, RAPID:Collaborative Research:Cloud Environmental Analysis and Relief, CNS# 1047753.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jules White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, J., Thompson, C., Turner, H. et al. WreckWatch: Automatic Traffic Accident Detection and Notification with Smartphones. Mobile Netw Appl 16, 285–303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-011-0304-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-011-0304-8

Keywords

Navigation