Skip to main content
Log in

A Service-Oriented Architecture for Body Area NanoNetworks with Neuron-based Molecular Communication

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular communication provides communication and networking capabilities for nanomachines such as biosensors and bio-actuators to form and enable Body Area NanoNetworks (BANNs). This paper considers neuron-based molecular communication, which utilizes natural neurons as a primary component to build BANNs, and proposes an end-to-end software architecture to manage and control neuron-based BANNs through a series of software services. Those services aid to realize end user applications in healthcare, such as biomedical and rehabilitation applications. In the proposed architecture, a neuron-based BANN consists of a set of nanomachines and a network of neurons that are artificially formed into a particular topology. This paper investigates two mechanisms in the proposed architecture: (1) an artificial assembly method to form neurons into specific three-dimensional topology patterns and (2) a communication protocol for neuronal signaling based on Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), called Neuronal TDMA. The assembly method uses silica beads as growth surface and bead-bead contacts as geometrical constraints on neuronal connectivity. A web lab experiment verifies this method with neuronal hippocampal cells. Neuronal TDMA leverages an evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm (EMOA) to optimize the signaling schedules for nanomachines. Simulation results demonstrate that the Neuronal TDMA efficiently obtains quality solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atakan B, Balasubramaniam S, Akan OB (2012) Body area nanonetworks with molecular communications in nanomedicine. IEEE Commun Mag 50(1):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balasubramaniam S, Boyle NT, Della-Chiesa A, Walsh F, Mardinoglu A, Botvich D, Prina-Mello A (2011) Development of artificial neuronal networks for molecular communication. Nano Commun Netw 2(2–3):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Proceedings Int’l conference on parallel problem solving from nature

  4. Freitas RA (2005) Current status of nanomedicine and medical nanorobotics. J Comput Theor Nanosci 2(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gine LP, Akyildiz IF (2009) Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks. Comput Netw 53:2753–2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley

  7. Hosokawa C, Sakamoto Y, Kudoh SN, Hosokawa Y, Taguchi T (2013) Femtosecond laser-induced stimulation of a single neuron in a neuronal network. Appl Phys A 110(3):607–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibuchi H, Tsukamoto N, Hitotsuyanagi Y, Nojima Y (2008) Effectiveness of scalability improvement attempts on the performance of NSGA-II for many-objective problems. In: Proceedings ACM conference on genetic and Evolution Computation

  9. Jun SB, Hynd MR, Dowell-Mesfin N, Smith KL, Turner JN, Shain W, Kima SJ (2007) Low-density neuronal networks cultured using patterned polyl-L-lysine on microelectrode arrays. J Neurosci Methods 160(2):317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lio P, Balasubramaniam S (2012) Opportunistic routing through conjugation in bacteria communication nanonetwork. Nano Comm Networks 3(1)

  11. Luczak A (2010) Measuring neuronal branching patterns using model-based approach. Front Comput Neurosci 4:135

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moo Sung Chae MRYLHWL, Yang Z (2009) A 128-channel 6mw wireless neural recording ic with spike feature extraction and uwb transmitter. IEEE Trans Neur Sys Reh 17(4):312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore M, Enomoto A, Nakano T, Egashira R, Suda T, Kayasuga A, Kojima H, Sakakibara H, Oiwa K (2006) A design of a molecular communication system for nanomachines using molecular motors. In: Proceedings IEEE Int’l Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops

  14. Nakano T, Moore M, Wei F, Vasilakos AV, Shuai JW (2012) Molecular communication and networking: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 11(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakano T, Suda T, Moore M, Egashira R, Enomoto A, Arima K (2005) Molecular communication for nanomachines using intercellular calcium signaling. In: Proceedings IEEE Int’l Conferences on Nanotechnology

  16. Partridge K, Dahlquist B, Veiseh A, Cain A, Foreman A, Goldberg J, Borriello G (2001) Empirical measurements of intrabody communication performance under varied physical configurations. Proc User Interface Softw Technol Symp

  17. Silvestro Micera KY, Navarro X (2009) Interfacing with the peripheral nervous system to develop innovative neuroprostheses. IEEE Trans Neur Sys Reh 17(5):417–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stuart G, Schiller J, Sakmann B (1997) Action potential initiation and propagation in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Physiol 505:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suda T, Moore M, Nakano T, Egashira R, Enomoto A (2005) Exploratory research on molecular communication between nanomachines. Proc ACM Genetic Evol Computat Conference

  20. Tezcan H, Oktug S, Kok FN (2012) Neural delay lines for tdma based molecular communication in neural networks. Proc. IEEE Int’l Conference on Communications

  21. Zimmerman T (1996) Personal area networks (PAN): Near-field intra-body communication. IBM Syst J 35(3–4):609–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2002) SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Evol. Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control with Application to Industrial Problems

  23. Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optization using evolutionary algorithms: A comparative study. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature

  24. Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Computat 3 (4)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichi Suzuki.

Additional information

This work is supported in part by the FiDiPro programme of Academy of Finland “Nanocommunication Networks” 2012–2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, J., Balasubramaniam, S., Pautot, S. et al. A Service-Oriented Architecture for Body Area NanoNetworks with Neuron-based Molecular Communication. Mobile Netw Appl 19, 707–717 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-014-0549-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-014-0549-0

Keywords

Navigation