Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Intrusion Detection System for IoT Heterogeneous Perceptual Network

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the acceleration of the Internet of things (IoT) construction, the security and energy consumption of IoT will become an import factor restricting the overall development of the IoT. In order to reduce the energy consumption of the IoT heterogeneous perceptual network in the attack-defense process, the placement strategy of the intrusion detection system (IDS) described in this paper is to place the IDS on the cluster head nodes selected by the clustering algorithm called ULEACH, which we have proposed in this paper. By optimizing the calculation of the node threshold, the ULEACH clustering algorithm will comprehensively consider the heterogeneity of the perceptual nodes and take the residual energy, energy consumption rate, and overall performance of the nodes into account. As a result, the strategy improves the utilization of the nodes to enhance the performance of heterogeneous perceptual network and extend the lifetime of the system. Furthermore, the paper proposes a intrusion detection system framework and establishes dynamic intrusion detection model for IoT heterogeneous perceptual network based on game theory, by applying modified particle swarm optimization, the optimal defense strategy that could balance the detection efficiency and energy consumption of the system is obtained. Finally, the experiment results show that proposed strategy not only effectively detects multiple network attacks, but also reduces energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz I, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Karaki J, Kamal A (2017) Routing techniques in wsn: a survey. IEEE J Wirel Commun 11:6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anirudha A, Mangesh G, Ritesh V (2017) A survey on data mining approaches for network intrusion detection system. Int J Comput Appl 159(1):20–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castiglione A, Palmieri F, Fiore U; (2015) Modeling energy-efficient secure communications in multi-mode wireless mobile devices. Comput Syst Sci 81:1464–1478

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Asaad M, Ahmad F, Alam MS, Rafat Y (2018) Iot enabled monitoring of an optimized electric vehicle’s battery system. Mobile Netw Appl 23(4):994–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhunia S (2018) Internet of things security: Are we paranoid enough. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), IEEE, pp 1–1

  7. Caviglione L, Merlo A (2012) The energy impact of security mechanisms in modern mobile devices. Netw Secur 2012(2): 11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y, Wen X, Lu Z, Shao H (2017) Energy efficient clustering and beamforming for cloud radio access networks. Mobile Netw Appl 22(3):589–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong C-M, Chang C-F, Lee B-H. (2013) A simple time shift scheme for beacon broadcasting based on cluster-tree ieee 802.15.4 low-rate wpans. Wirel Pers Commun 72(4):2837–2848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Curti M, Merlo A, Migliardi M, Schiappacasse S (2013) Towards energy-aware intrusion detection systems on mobile devices. In: 2013 International Conference on High Performance Computing Simulation (HPCS), pp 289–296

  11. Hajisalem V, Babaie S (2018) A hybrid intrusion detection system based on abc-afs algorithm for misuse and anomaly detection. Comput Netw 136:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Han L, Zhou M, Jia W, Dalil Z, Xu X (2018) Intrusion detection model of wireless sensor networks based on game theory and an autoregressive model. Information Sciences

  13. Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan ABh (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE, vol 2, p 10

  14. Henningsen S, Dietzel S, Scheuermann B (2018) Misbehavior detection in industrial wireless networks: Challenges and directions. Mobile Netw Appl 23(5):1330–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong S, Kim Y (2017) Developing usable interface for internet of things security analysis software. In: Tryfonas T (ed) Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 322–328

  16. Hossein J (2011) Designing an agent-based intrusion detection system for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks: robust, fault tolerant and dynamic reconfigurable. Int J Communications, Network and System Sciences 4:523–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang K, Cai M, Qin YCM (2007) Hybrid intrusion detection with weighted signature generation over anomalous internet episodes. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, pp 41–55

  18. Kim D, Shin D, Shin D, Kim YH (2018) Attack detection application with attack tree for mobile system using log analysis. Mobile Networks and Applications

  19. Luo J, Wu D (2015) Optimal energy strategy for node selection and data relay in wsn-based iot. Mobile Netw Appl 20(2): 169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mbanaso UM, Chukwudebe GA, Adebisi B (2017) Holistic security architecture for iot technologies. In: 2017 13th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO), pp. 11–16

  21. Merlo A, Migliardi M, Caviglione L (2015) A survey on energy-aware security mechanisms. Pervasive Mob Comput 24:77–90. special Issue on Secure Ubiquitous Computing

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Quick, T.R.D.: The deter project. https://www.isi.deterlab.net/index.php3

  23. Morais A, Cavalli A (2014) A distributed and collaborative intrusion detection architecture for wireless mesh networks. Mobile Netw Appl 19(1):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murali A, Rao M (2005) A survey on intrusion detection approaches. In: International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies, pp 233–240

  25. Ozger M, Cetinkaya O, Akan OB (2018) Energy harvesting cognitive radio networking for iot-enabled smart grid. Mobile Netw Appl 23(4):956–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadek RA (2018) Hybrid energy aware clustered protocol for iot heterogeneous network. Future Computing and Informatics Journal

  27. Sahoo KC, Pati UC (2017) Iot based intrusion detection system using pir sensor. In: 2017 2Nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information Communication Technology (RTEICT), IEEE, pp 1641–1645

  28. Sedjelmaci H, Senouci SM, Taleb T (2017) An accurate security game for low-resource iot devices. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(10):9381–9393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sedjelmaci H, Senouci SM, Feham M (2011) New framework for a hierarchical intrusion detection mechanism in cluster-based wireless sensor networks. Security & Communication Networks

  30. Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 69–73

  31. Totel E, Hkimi M, Hurfin M, Leslous M, Labiche Y (2016) Inferring a distributed application behavior model for anomaly based intrusion detection. In: 2016 12Th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC), IEEE, pp 53–64

  32. Vorakulpipat C, Rattanalerdnusorn E, Thaenkaew P, Hai HD (2018) Recent challenges, trends, and concerns related to iot security: an evolutionary study. In: 2018 20th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp 1–1

  33. Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) Heed: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 3 (08

  34. Zhang XF (2003) A survey on the development of intrusion detection system. Computer Science

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper is supported by National Natural Science Fund NSF: 61272033 & 61572222.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Man Zhou, Lansheng Han, Hongwei Lu & Cai Fu

Authors
  1. Man Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lansheng Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongwei Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cai Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lansheng Han.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, M., Han, L., Lu, H. et al. Intrusion Detection System for IoT Heterogeneous Perceptual Network. Mobile Netw Appl 26, 1461–1474 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01483-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01483-5

Keywords