Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Optimal Uplink Scheduling in Heterogeneous PLC and LTE Communication for Delay-aware Smart Grid Applications

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smart grid is an energy network that integrates advanced power equipment, communication technology and control technology. It can transmit two-way power and data among all components of the grid at the same time. The existing smart grid communication technologies include power line carrier (PLC) communication, industrial Ethernet, passive optical networks and wireless communication,each of which have different advantages. Due to the complex application scenarios, massive sampling points and high transmission reliability requirements, a single communication method cannot fully meet the communication requirements of smart grid, and heterogeneous communication modes are required. In addition, with the development of cellular technology, long term evolution (LTE)-based standards have been identified as a promising technology that can meet the strict requirements of various operations in smart grid. In this paper, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of PLC and LTE communication, and design a network framework for PLC and LTE communication uplink heterogeneous communication in smart grid. Then, we propose an uplink scheduling transmission method for sampling data with optimized throughput according to the requirements of system delay and reliability. Then, we use the formula derivation to prove the stability and solvability of the scheduling system in theory. Finally, the simulation results show that under the condition of satisfying the delay requirement, our proposed framework can optimally allocate the wireless communication resource and maximize the throughput of the uplink transmission system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qiyue L, Tengfei C, Wei S, Weitao L (2020) Throughput optimal uplink scheduling in heterogeneousplc and lte communication for delay-aware smart gridapplications. In: 10th EAI International conference on mobile networks and management (EAI MONAMI 2020), pp 1–20

  2. Fang X, Misra S, Xue G, Yang D (2011) Smart grid–the new and improved power grid: A survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 14(4):944–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Z, Zhang C, Dong M, Gu B, Ji Y, Tanaka Y (2016) Markov-decision-process-assisted consumer scheduling in a networked smart grid. IEEE Access 5:2448–2458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu C, Zhi L, Zhang D, Tsutomu Y, Yusheng J (2018) Spatial intelligence toward trustworthy vehicular IoT. IEEE Commun Mag 56(10):22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Liu Z, Gao Y, Zheng X, Dang Z, Shen X (2019) A near-optimal protocol for the grouping problem in rfid systems. IEEE Trans Mob Comput

  6. Yen SW, Morris S, Ezra MAG, Huat TJ (2019) Effect of smart meter data collection frequency in an early detection of shorter-duration voltage anomalies in smart grids. Int J Elec Power Sys 109(JUL.):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang XC, Wang YT (2017) The application of power communication technology in smart grid. Manag Technol Sme

  8. Prasad G, Lampe L, Shekhar S (2016) In-band full duplex broadband power line communications. IEEE Trans Commun 64(9):3915–3931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. López G, Matanza J, De La Vega D, Castro M, Arrinda A, Moreno JI, Sendin A (2019) The role of power line communications in the smart grid revisited: Applications, challenges, and research initiatives. IEEE Access 7:117346–117368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abou-Rjeily C (2017) Power line communications under rayleigh fading and nakagami noise: novel insights on the mimo and multi-hop techniques. Iet Commun 12(2):184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucas-Estañ MC, Raptis TP, Sepulcre M, Passarella A, Regueiro C, Lazaro O (2018) A software defined hierarchical communication and data management architecture for industry 4.0. In: 2018 14th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), pages 37–44

  12. Zhang J, Adarsh H, Wei J, Alam S, Tarek E, Anthony F, Bri-Mathias H (2018) Hybrid communication architectures for distributed smart grid applications. Energies 11(4):871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Han T, Li S, Zhong Y, Bai Z, Sup Kwak K (2019) 5g software-defined heterogeneous networks with cooperation and partial connectivity. IEEE Access PP(99):1–1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barbierato L, Estebsari A, Pons E, Pau M, Salassa F, Ghirardi M, Patti E (2018) A distributed iot infrastructure to test and deploy real-time demand response in smart grids. IEEE Int Things J PP (1–1):08

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Z, Dong M, Zhou H, Wang X, Ji Y, Tanaka Y (2016) Device-to-device assisted video frame recovery for picocell edge users in heterogeneous networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, p 2016

  16. Kabalci Y (2016) A survey on smart metering and smart grid communication. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 57:302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Schepper T, Bosch P, Zeljkovi E, Mahfoudhi F, Haxhibeqiri J, Hoebeke J, Famaey J, Latré S (2018) Orchestra: Enabling inter-technology network management in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag

  18. Zhang J, Adarsh H, Wei J, Alam S, Tarek E, Anthony F, Bri-Mathias H (2018) Hybrid communication architectures for distributed smart grid applications. Energies 11(4):871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wan J, Yang J, Wang S, Li D, Li P, Xia M (2020) Cross-network fusion and scheduling for heterogeneous networks in smart factory. IEEE Trans Indust Inform 16(9):6059–6068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zarrabian MA, Tabataba FS, Molavipour S, Sadeghi P (2017) Multirate packet delivery in heterogeneous broadcast networks. IEEE Trans Vehic Technol PP(99)

  21. Koohifar F, Saputro N, Guvenc I, Akkaya K (2015) Hybrid wi-fi/lte aggregation architecture for smart meter communications. In: IEEE international conference on smart grid communications

  22. HP, MS S (2019) Traffic control in 5g heterogenous network. In: 2019 international conference on vision towards emerging trends in communication and networking (ViTECoN), pp 1–5

  23. Yang G, Jia X (2019) Research on sub-channel and power control in heterogeneous network. In: 2019 international conference on computer network, electronic and automation (ICCNEA), pp 336–342

  24. Yao J, Wei L, Zhang H, Li B (2018) Heterogeneous network selection algorithm based on electric service-feature-aware. In: 2018 2nd IEEE advanced information management, communicates, electronic and automation control conference (IMCEC), pp 62–65

  25. Sun W, Li P, Liu Z, Xue X, Li Q, Zhang H, Wang J (2020) Lstm based link quality confidence interval boundary prediction for wireless communication in smart grid. Computing

  26. Dib LdMBA, Fernandes V, Mateus DLF, Ribeiro MV (2017) Hybrid plc/wireless communication for smart grids and internet of things applications. IEEE Int Things J 1–1

  27. Zhou Y, Xie J (2017) Analysis of wiring in the radiated disturbance measurement of electronic equipment. In: 2017 IEEE 5th international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility (EMC-Beijing), pp 1–6

  28. Sun W, Li Q, Wang J, Chen L, Mu D, Yuan X (2018) A radio link reliability prediction model for wireless sensor networks. Int J Sensor Netw 215(01):27

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sánchez PA, Luna-Ramírez S, Toril M, Gijon C, Luque JB (2020) A data-driven scheduler performance model for qoe assessment in a lte radio network planning tool. Comput Netw: 107186

  30. Li Q, Ge Y, Yang Y, Zhu Y, Sun W, Li J (2019) An energy efficient uplink scheduling and resource allocation for m2m communications in sc-fdma based lte-a networks. In: Leung VCM, Zhang H, Hu X, Liu Q, Liu Z (eds) 5G for future wireless networks. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 124–140

  31. Park J, Hwang JN, Li Q, Xu Y, Huang W (2018) Optimal dash-multicasting over Lte. IEEE Trans Veh Technol: 1–1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Sun.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work is supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52077049, 51877060), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2008085UD04), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (PA2020GDJQ0027, JZ2019HGTB0089, PA2019GDQT0006), the 111 Project (BP0719039), and State Grid Science and Technology Project (Research and application of key Technologies for integrated substation intelligent operation and maintenance based on the fusion of heterogeneous network and heterogeneous data).

Note that this paper is an extended version of our MONAMI 2020 conference paper [1]. In this paper, we augment the system model by including packet loss rate of PLC and the throughput per unit time of PLC and LTE. Besides, the stability of our scheduling method is also proved, as well as more experiments are performed in addition to our conference paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Cao, T., Sun, W. et al. An Optimal Uplink Scheduling in Heterogeneous PLC and LTE Communication for Delay-aware Smart Grid Applications. Mobile Netw Appl 26, 1986–1999 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01739-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01739-z

Keywords

Navigation