Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic personalized video abstraction for sports videos using metadata

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Video abstraction is defined as creating a video abstract which includes only important information in the original video streams. There are two general types of video abstracts, namely the dynamic and static ones. The dynamic video abstract is a 3-dimensional representation created by temporally arranging important scenes while the static video abstract is a 2-dimensional representation created by spatially arranging only keyframes of important scenes. In this paper, we propose a unified method of automatically creating these two types of video abstracts considering the semantic content targeting especially on broadcasted sports videos. For both types of video abstracts, the proposed method firstly determines the significance of scenes. A play scene, which corresponds to a play, is considered as a scene unit of sports videos, and the significance of every play scene is determined based on the play ranks, the time the play occurred, and the number of replays. This information is extracted from the metadata, which describes the semantic content of videos and enables us to consider not only the types of plays but also their influence on the game. In addition, user’s preferences are considered to personalize the video abstracts. For dynamic video abstracts, we propose three approaches for selecting the play scenes of the highest significance: the basic criterion, the greedy criterion, and the play-cut criterion. For static video abstracts, we also propose an effective display style where a user can easily access target scenes from a list of keyframes by tracing the tree structures of sports games. We experimentally verified the effectiveness of our method by comparing our results with man-made video abstracts as well as by conducting questionnaires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babaguchi N, Kawai Y, Ogura T, Kitahashi T (2004) Personalized abstraction of broadcasted american football video by highlight selection. IEEE Trans Multimedia 6(4):575–586 (August)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boreczky J, Girgensohn A, Golovchinsky G, Uchihashi S (2000) An interactive comic book presentation for exploring video. In: Proc. ACM CHI’00, pp 185–192, The Hague, 1–6 April 2000

  3. Chang S-F, Sundaram H (2000) Structural and semantic analysis of video. In: Proc. IEEE ICME 2000, New York, 30 July–2 August 2000

  4. Chiu P, Girgensohn A, Liu Q (2004) Stained-glass visualization for highly condensed video summaries. In: Proc. IEEE ICME 2004, Taipei, 27–30 June 2004

  5. Ekin A, Tekalp AM, Mehrotra R (2003) Automatic soccer video analysis and summarization. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(7):796–807 (July)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferman AM, Tekalp AM (2003) Two-stage hierarchical video summary extraction to match low-level user browsing preferences. IEEE Trans Multimed 5(2):244–256 (June)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanjalic A (2003) Generic approach to highlights extraction from a sport video. In: Proc. IEEE ICIP 2003, vol 1. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1–4 (September)

    Google Scholar 

  8. He L, Sanocki E, Gupta A, Grudin J (1999) Auto-summarization of audio-video presentations. In: Proc. ACM Multimedia’99. ACM, New York, pp 489–498 (November)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaimes A, Echigo T, Teraguchi M, Satoh F (2002) Learning personalized video highlights from detailed MPEG-7 metadata. In: Proc. IEEE ICIP 2002, I. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 133–136 (September)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Komlodi A, Marchionini G (1998) Key frame preview techniques for video browsing. In: Proc. ACM international conference on digital libraries. ACM, New York, pp 118–125 (June)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J-H, Lee G-G, Kim W-Y (2003) Automatic video summarizing tool using MPEG-7 descriptors for personal video recorder. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 49(3):742–749 (August)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lienhart R (2000) Dynamic video summarization of home video. SPIE 3972:378–389 (January)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma Y-F, Zhang H-J (2002) A model of motion attention for video skimming. In: Proc. ICIP, vol 1. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 129–132

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martinez JM (2001) Overview of the MPEG-7 standard (version 6.0). ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N4509 (December)

  15. Masumitsu K, Echigo T (2001) Meta-data framework for constructing individualized video digest. In: Proc. IEEE ICIP 2001, vol 3. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 390–393 (October)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nam J, Tewfik AT (1999) Dynamic video summarization and visualization. In: Proc. ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 53–56

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ngo C-W, Ma Y-F, Zhang H-J (2005) Video summarization and scene detection by graph modeling. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 15(2):296–305 (February)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh JH, Hua KA (2000) An efficient technique for summarizing videos using visual contents. In: Proc. IEEE ICME 2000. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1167–1170 (July)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peker KA, Divakaran A (2004) Adaptive fast playback-based video skimming using a compressed-domain visual complexity measure. In: Proc. IEEE ICME 2004, Taipei, 27–30 June 2004

  20. Rui Y, Gupta A, Acero A (2000) Automatically extracting highlights for TV baseball programs. In: Proc. ACM Multimedia 2000. ACM, New York, pp 105–115 (October)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith MA, Kanade T (1997) Video skimming and characterization through the combination of image and language understanding techniques. In: Proc. IEEE CVPR’97. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 775–781 (June)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sundaram H, Xie L, Chang S-F (2002) A utility framework for the automatic generation of audio-visual skims. In: Proc. ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 189–198

    Google Scholar 

  23. Takahashi Y, Nitta N, Babaguchi N (2004) Automatic video summarization of sports videos using metadata. In: Proc. IEEE PCM 2004, vol 2. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 272–280 (December)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takahashi Y, Nitta N, Babaguchi N (2005) Video summarization for large sports video archives. In: Proc. IEEE ICME 2005, Amsterdam, 6–8 July 2005

  25. Tjondronegoro D, Chen Y-PP, Pham B (2004) Integrating highlights for more complete sports video summarization. IEEE Multimed 11(4):22–37 (October)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tse T, Marchionini G, Ding W, Slaughter L, Komlodi A (1998) Dynamic key frame presentation techniques for augmenting video browsing. In: Proc. advanced visual interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 185–194

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tseng BL, Lin C-Y, Smith JR (2004a) Using MPEG-7 and MPEG-21 for personalizing video. IEEE Multimed 11(1):42–52 (January–March)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tseng BL, Lin C-Y, Smith JR (2004b) Video personalization and summarization system for usage environment. J Vis Commun Image Represent 15:370–392 (May)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Uchihashi S, Foote J (1999) Summarizing video using a shot importance measure and a frame-packing algorithm. In: Proc. ICASSP’99, vol 6. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 3041–3044 (March)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Uchihashi S, Foote J, Girgensohn A, Boreczky J (1999) Video manga: generating semantically meaningful video summaries. In: Proc. ACM Multimedia’99. ACM, New York, pp 383–392 (October)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong Z, Radhakrishnan R, Divakaran A, Huang TS (2005) Highlights extraction from sports video based on an audio-visual marker detection framework. In: Proc. IEEE ICME 2005, Amsterdam, 6–8 July 2005

  32. Xu C, Wang J, Wan K, Li Y, Duan L (2006) Live sports event detection based on broadcast video and web-casting text. In: Proc. ACM Multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 221–230 (October)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu H, Chua T-S (2006) Fusion of AV features and external information sources for event detection in team sports video. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 2(1):44–67 (February)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou W, Vellaikal A, Kuo CCJ (2000) Rule-based video classification system for basketball video indexing. In: Proc. ACM workshops on Multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 213–216 (November)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Nitta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nitta, N., Takahashi, Y. & Babaguchi, N. Automatic personalized video abstraction for sports videos using metadata. Multimed Tools Appl 41, 1–25 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0217-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0217-0

Keywords

Navigation