Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiresolution HVS and statistically based image coding scheme

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a novel multiresolution human visual system and statistically based image coding scheme is presented. It decorrelates the input image into a number of subbands using a lifting based wavelet transform. The codec employs a novel statistical encoding algorithm to code the coefficients in the detail subbands. Perceptual weights are applied to regulate the threshold value of each detail subband that is required in the statistical encoding process. The baseband coefficients are losslessly coded. An extension of the codec to the progressive transmission of images is also developed. To evaluate the performance of the coding scheme, it was applied to a number of test images and its performance with and without perceptual weights is evaluated. The results indicate significant improvement in both subjective and objective quality of the reconstructed images when perceptual weights are employed. The performance of the proposed technique was also compared to JPEG and JPEG2000. The results show that the proposed coding scheme outperforms both coding standards at low compression ratios, while offering satisfactory performance at higher compression ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagheri Zadeh P, Sheikh Akbari A, Soraghan JJ, Buggy T (2005) A novel progressive image coding scheme for handheld videophone applications, IMVIP2005, Northern Ireland

  2. Barua S, Kotteri KA, Bell AE, Carletta JE (2004) Optimal quantized lifting coefficients for the 9/7 wavelet, ICASSP2004, Montreal, Canada

  3. Bradley AP (1999) A wavelet visible difference predictor. IEEE Trans Image Process 8(5)

  4. Chang RF, Chen WT (1993) Image coding using variable-rate side—match finite-state vector quantization. IEEE Trans Image Process 2(1)

  5. Daubechies I, Sweldens W (1998) Factoring wavelet transforms into lifting steps. J Fourier Anal Appl 4(3)

  6. Fahmy GF, Panchanathan S (2004) A lifting based system for compression and classification trade off in the JPEG2000 framework. J Visual Commun Image Represent 15

  7. HSontsch I, Karam LJ (2000) Locally adaptive perceptual image coding. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(9)

  8. Hwang WJ, Derin H (1995) Multiresolution multisource progressive image transmission. IEEE Trans Image Process 4(8)

  9. Information Technology-JPEG-Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous-Cone Still Image-Part 1: Requirement and Guidelines (1994) ISO/IEC 10918-1 and ITU-T Recommendation T.81.

  10. JPEG 2000 Part I Final Committee Draft Version 1.0, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG1 N1646R, Mar. 2000

  11. Kaia X, Jiea Y, Minb ZY, Lianga LX (2005) HVS-based medical image compression. Eur J Radiol 55:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotteri KA, Barua S, Bell AE, Carletta JE (2005) A comparison of hardware implementations of the biorthogonal 9/7 DWT: convolution versus lifting. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Part II: Express Briefs 52(5)

  13. Lawson S, Zhu J (2002) Image compression using wavelets and JPEG2000: a tutorial. Electron Commun Eng J 14(3):112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao H, Mandal MKr, Cockburn BF (2004) Efficient architectures for 1-D and 2-D lifting-based wavelet transforms. IEEE Trans Signal Process 52(5)

  15. Lu ZM, Pan JS, Sun SH (2000) Image coding based on classified side-match vector quantization. IEICE Transaction Information System E83-D(12)

  16. Z. M. Lu, B. Yang and S. H. Sun (2002) Image compression algorithms based on side-match vector quantization with gradient-based classifiers. IEICE Transaction Information System, E85-D, no. (9)

  17. Mallat S (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 11:674–693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Marziliano P, Dufaux F, Winkler S, Ebrahimi T (2004) Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000. Signal Processing: Image Communication 19:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pastuszak G (2005) A high-performance architecture for embedded block coding in JPEG 2000. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 15(9)

  20. Pennebaker WB, Mitchell JL (1993) JPEG still image data compression standard. Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Said A, Pearlman WA (1996) A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 6(3):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saryazdi S, M. Jafari (2002) A high performance image coding using uniform morphological sampling, residues classifying, and vector quantization, EurAsia-ICT 2002, Shiraz, Iran

  23. Scargall LD, Dlay SS (2000) New methodology for adaptive vector quantization. IEE Proceedings on Vision, Image and Signal Processing 147(6)

  24. Shapiro JM (1993) Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 41(12):3445–3462

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheikh Akbari A, Soraghan JJ (2003) Adaptive joint subband vector quantisation codec for handheld videophone applications. IEE Electronic Letters 39(14):1044–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheikh Akbari A, Bagheri Zadeh P, Cochrane E, Soraghan JJ (2004) Wavelet-based video codec using Human Visual System Coefficients for 3G mobiles, EUSIPCO 2004, Austria

  27. Skodras A, Christopoulos Ch, Ebrahimi T (2001) The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard. IEEE Signal Process Mag 18(5)

  28. Sweldens W (1997) The lifting scheme: a construction of second generation wavelets. SIAM J Math Analysis 29(2)

  29. Taubman D (2000) High performance scalable image compression with EBCOT. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 9(7)

  30. Taubman DS, Marcellin MW (2004) JPEG 2000 image compression fundamentals, standard and practice. Kluwer, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Dyck RE, Rajala SA (1994) Subband/VQ coding of colour images with perceptually optimal bit allocation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 4(1)

  32. Voukelatos SP, Soraghan JJ (1997) Very low bit rate color video coding using adaptive subband vector quantization with dynamic bit allocation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 7(2):424–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Taubmana D, Ordentlichb E, Weinberger M, Seroussi G (2002) Embedded block coding in JPEG2000. Signal Processing: Image Communication 17:49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Free software downloadable from: http://www.ece.uvic.ca/~mdadams/Jasper/

  35. Andra K, Chakrabarti C, Acharya T (2003) A high-performance JPEG2000 architecture. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 13(3):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooneh Bagheri Zadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagheri Zadeh, P., Sheikh Akbari, A., Buggy, T. et al. Multiresolution HVS and statistically based image coding scheme. Multimed Tools Appl 49, 347–370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0371-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0371-z

Keywords

Navigation