Abstract
Tri-way Pixel Value Differencing (TPVD) steganographic method is a new modified version of another well-known method called PVD, which intents to increase embedding capacity and security of its successor by hiding secret bits in both vertical and diagonal edges of a cover image, in addition to the horizontal edges used in PVD. In this paper, it is shown that the histogram of difference values of a stego image under the TPVD algorithms is vulnerable to a particular statistical analysis. So, a new steganalytic measure named Growing Anomalies is introduced that its value has a linear relationship with secret message rate. It is shown empirically and theoretically that proposed steganalysis method based on this measure can estimate the amount of secret bits with a negligible error rate. The proposed steganalyser can classify test images as stego or cover with 97% accuracy when they contain more that 10% secret data. Implementation results indicate that proposed method can estimate secret message rate with an average accuracy of 95%.
















Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Anderson RG, Petitcolas FAP (1998) On the limits of steganography. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun Special Issue on Copyright and Privacy Protection 16:474–481
Bui C, Lee H, Joo J, Lee H (2010) steganalysis method defeating the modified Pixel-value differencing steganography. ICIC 6:3193–3203
Chang K, Chang C, Huang PS, Tu T (2008) A novel image steganographic method using tri-way pixel-value differencing. J Multimedia 3:37–44. doi:10.4304/jmm.3.2.37-44
Fridrich J, Goljan M (2002) Practical steganalysis of digital images-state of the art. Proc. SPIE Photonics West Electron. Imaging 4675:1–13
Fridrich J, Goljan M, Du R (2001) Detecting LSB steganography in color and gray-scale images. IEEE Multimedia 8:22–28. doi:10.1109/93.959097
Goljan M, Fridrich J, Holotyak T (2006) New blind steganalysis and its implications. in Proc. of the SPIE, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VI, 6072:1–13.
Gul G, Kurugollu F (2010) SVD-based universal spatial domain image steganalysis. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5:349–353. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2010.2041826
Johnson NF, Jajodia S (1998) Steganalysis of images created using current steganography software. LNCS, Springer 1525:273–289. doi:10.1007/3-540-49380-8
Johnson N, Duric Z, Jajodia S (2001) Information hiding: steganography and watermarking-attacks and countermeasures. Kluwer, Boston
Joo J, Hae-Yeoun L, Cong B, Won-Young Y, Heung-Kyu L (2008) Steganalytic measures for the steganography using pixel-value differencing and modulus function. LNCS, Springer Berlin 5353:476–485. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89796-5_49
Provos N, Honeyman P (2001) Detecting steganographic content on the internet. Technical Report CITI 01-1a, University of Michigan
Sabeti V, Samavi S, Mahdavi M, Shirani S (2007) Steganalysis of pixel-value differencing steganographic method. IEEE Pacific Rim Conference. 292–295.
Sabeti V, Samavi S, Mahdavi M, Shirani S (2009) Steganalysis and payload estimation of embedding in pixel differences using neural networks. Pattern Recognit Lett 43:405–415
Westfeld A (2001) F5-A steganographic algorithm: high capacity despite better steganalysis. IHW, LNCS, Springer-Verlag 2137:289–302
Westfeld A, Pfitzmann A (1999) Attacks on steganographic systems. IHW, LNCS, Springer-Verlag 1768:61–76
Wu DC, Tsai WH (2003) A steganographic method for images by pixel-value differencing. Pattern Recognit Lett 24:1613–1626
Zaker N, Hamzeh A, Katebi SD, Samavi S (2009) Improving security of pixel value differencing steganographic method. NTMS'09, IEEE Press, NJ, USA, pp 399–402. doi:10.1109/NTMS.2009.5384692
Zhang X, Wang S (2004) Vulnerability of pixel-value differencing steganography to histogram analysis and modification for enhanced security. Pattern Recognit Lett 25:331–339
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaker, N., Hamzeh, A. A novel steganalysis for TPVD steganographic method based on differences of pixel difference histogram. Multimed Tools Appl 58, 147–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0714-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0714-9