Abstract
The quality of biometric samples plays an important role in biometric authentication systems because it has a direct impact on verification or identification performance. In this paper, we present a novel 3D face recognition system which performs quality assessment on input images prior to recognition. More specifically, a reject option is provided to allow the system operator to eliminate the incoming images of poor quality, e.g. failure acquisition of 3D image, exaggerated facial expressions, etc.. Furthermore, an automated approach for preprocessing is presented to reduce the number of failure cases in that stage. The experimental results show that the 3D face recognition performance is significantly improved by taking the quality of 3D facial images into account. The proposed system achieves the verification rate of 97.09% at the False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 0.1% on the FRGC v2.0 data set.











Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besl P, McKay H (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256
Bowyer KW, Chang K, Flynn P (2006) A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D + 2D face recognition. Comput Vis Image Underst 101(1):1–15
Chang KI, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2005) Adaptive rigid multi-region selection for handling expression variation in 3D face recognition. In: Proc. IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 3, pp 157–164, June
Chang KI, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2005) An evaluation of multimodal 2D+3D face biometrics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(4):619–24
Cook J, Chandran V, Fookes C (2006) 3D face recognition using Log-Gabor templates. In: Proc. British machine vision conference
Duda R, Hart P, Stork D (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley-Interscience
Faltemier T, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2008) A region ensemble for 3-D face recognition. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 3(1):62–73
Garcia-Romero D, Fierrez-Aguilar J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J, Ortega-Garcia J (2004) On the use of quality measures for text-independent speaker recognition. In: ODYSSEY04-the speaker and language recognition workshop, pp 105–110
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2 edn. Prentice Hall
Husken M, Brauckmann M, Gehlen S, der Malsburg CV (2005) Strategies and benefits of fusion of 2D and 3D face recognition. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition - workshops, p 174
Kalka ND (2005) Image quality assessment for iris biometric. Master’s thesis, West Virginia University
Lin W-Y, Chiu Y-L, Widder KR, Hu YH, Boston N (2010) Robust and accurate curvature estimation using adaptive line integrals. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2010:240309
Lin W-Y, Wong K-C, Boston N, Hu YH (2006) Fusion of summation invariants in 3D human face recognition. In: Proc. IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 2, pp 1369–1376
Lu X, Jain AK, Colbry D (2006) Matching 2.5D face scans to 3D models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(1):31–43
Maltoni D (2003) Handbook of fingerprint recognition. Springer
Maurer T, Guigonis D, Maslov I, Pesenti B, Tsaregorodtsev A, West D, Medioni G, Geometrix I (2005) Performance of geometrix ActiveID 3D face recognition engine on the FRGC data. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition - workshops, p 154
Mian A, Bennamoun M, Owens R (2007) An efficient multimodal 2D-3D hybrid approach to automatic face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(11):1927–1943
Modi S, Elliott S (2006) Impact of image quality on performance: comparison of young and elderly fingerprints. In: Proc. 6th intl. conf. on recent advances in soft computing, pp 449–454
Nandakumar K, Chen Y, Jain AK, Dass SC (2006) Quality-based score level fusion in multibiometric systems. In: Intl. conf. on pattern recognition, vol 4, pp 473–476
Phillips JP, Moon H, Rizvi SA, Rauss PJ (2000) The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(10):1090–1104
Phillips P, Flynn P, Scruggs T, Bowyer K, Chang J, Hoffman K, Marques J, Min J, Worek W (2005) Overview of the face recognition grand challenge. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1, pp 947–954
Ross A, Jain AK (2003) Information fusion in biometrics. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(13):2115–2125
Russ T, Koch M, Little C (2005) A 2D range Hausdorff approach for 3D face recognition. In: IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition - workshops
Shen L, Kot A, Koo W (2001) Quality measures of fingerprint images. In: Proc. third intl. conf. on audio-and video-based biometric person authentication, pp 266–271
Simon-Zorita D, Ortega-Garcia J, Fierrez-Aguilar J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J (2003) Image quality and position variability assessment in minutiae-based fingerprint verification. IEE Proc Vis Image Signal Process 150(6):402–408
Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Eigenfaces for recognition. J Cognitive Neurosci 3(1):71–86
Wildes R (1997) Iris recognition: An emerging biometric technology. Proc IEEE 85(9):1348–1363
Wong K, Lin W, Hu Y, Boston N, Zhang X (2007) Optimal linear combination of facial regions for improving identification performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 37(5):1138–1148
Zhao W, Chellappa R, Phillips PJ, Rosenfeld A (2003) Face recognition: a literature survey. ACM Comput Surv 35(4):399–458
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, WY., Chen, MY. A novel framework for automatic 3D face recognition using quality assessment. Multimed Tools Appl 68, 877–893 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1092-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1092-2