Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fourier irregularity index: A new approach to measure tumor mass irregularity in breast mammogram images

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shape descriptors have been identified as important features in distinguishing malignant masses from benign masses. Thus, an effective morphological irregularity measure could provide a helpful reference to indicate the likelihood of malignancy of breast masses. In this paper, a new Fourier-Transform-based measure of irregularity—Fourier Irregularity Index (F 2), is proposed to provide reliable malignant/benign tumor/mass classification. The proposed measure has been evaluated on 418 breast masses, including 190 malignant masses and 218 benign lesions identified by radiologists on film mammograms. The results show the proposed measure has better performance than other approaches, such as Compactness Index (CI), Fractal Dimension (FD) and the Fourier-descriptor-based shape Factor (FF). Furthermore, these mentioned measures are paired to investigate the possibility of performance improvement. The results showed the combination of F 2 and CI further enhances the performance in indicating the likelihood of malignancy of breast masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our implementation is based on package PyRadbas: http://cybercase.github.io/pyradbas/

References

  1. Alto H, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL (2005) Content-based retrieval and analysis of mammographic masses. J Electron Imaging 14:023016–023016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Orsi C, Bassett LW, Berg W, Feig S, Jackson V, Kopans D (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-mammography. American College of Radiology (ACR), Reston

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies D, Dance D (1990) Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 35:1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey P, Mohanty SK (2003) Fractal dimensions of breast lesions on cytology smears. Diagn Cytopathol 29:85–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman H (1961) On the encoding of arbitrary geometric configurations. IRE Trans Electron Comput EC-10:260–268

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo Q, Ruiz V, Shao J, Guo F (2005) A novel approach to mass abnormality detection in mammographic images. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, pp 180–185

  7. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer WP (2001) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp 212–218

  8. Kilday J, Palmieri F, Fox MD (1993) Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 12:664–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon K-C, Lim Y-T, Kim C-H, Kim N, Park C, Yoo K-H, Son S-H, Jeon S-I (2012) Microwave tomography analysis system for breast tumor detection. J Med Syst 36:1757–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee TK, McLean DI, Atkins MS (2003) Irregularity index: a new border irregularity measure for cutaneous melanocytic lesions. Med Image Anal 7:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang S, Rangaraj MR, Desautels J (1993) Detection and classification of mammographic calcifications. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 7:1403–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman J, Morris E, Dershaw D (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 171:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsubara T, Fujita H, Kasai S, Goto M, Tani Y, Hara T, Endo T (1997) Development of new schemes for detection and analysis of mammographic masses, pp 63–66

  14. Peitgen HO, Jürgens H, Saupe D (2004) Chaos and fractals: new frontiers of science. Springer Verlag

  15. Pohlman S, Powell KA, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA, Grundfest-Broniatowski S (1996) Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. Med Phys 23:1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rangayyan RM, El-Faramawy N, Desautels JEL, Alim OA (1997) Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rangayyan RM, Mudigonda NR, Desautels JEL (2000) Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rangayyan RM, Nguyen TM (2007) Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms. J Digit Imaging 20:223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salzberg S (1997) On comparing classifiers: pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach. Data Min Knowl Disc 1:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen L, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL (1994) Application of shape-analysis to mammographic calcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Spiesberger W (1979) Mammogram inspection by computer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-26(4):213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wee WG, Moskowitz M, Chang NC, Ting YC, Pemmeraju S (1975) Evaluation of mammographic calcifications using a computer program. Radiology 116:717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei Y, Su Z, Yazhu C, Yaqing C, Wenying L, Hongtao L (2008) Effective shape measures in malignant risk assessment for breast tumor on sonography. In: International Multisymposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences. IMSCCS ‘08, pp 51–56

  24. Wikipedia (2012) Fourier series. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_series

  25. Xiangyang X, ShengZhou X, Lianghai J, Shenyi Z (2010) Using PSO to improve dynamic programming based algorithm for breast mass segmentation. In: 2010 I.E. Fifth International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications (BIC-TA), pp 485–488

  26. Zabrodsky H, Peleg S, Avnir D (1995) Symmetry as a continuous feature. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 17:1154–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang G, Shin S, Wang W, Li Z, Choi H. A new Fourier-based approach to measure irregularity of breast masses in mammograms. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Research in Applied Computation Symposium (RACS ‘12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 153–157

  28. Zhang G, Wang W, Moon J, Pack JK, Jeon SI. A review of breast tissue classification in mammograms. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Research in Applied Computation (RACS ‘11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 232–237

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Wang.

Additional information

This research was funded by the MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning), Korea in the ICT R&D Program 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Wang, W., Shin, S. et al. Fourier irregularity index: A new approach to measure tumor mass irregularity in breast mammogram images. Multimed Tools Appl 74, 3783–3798 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1799-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1799-8

Keywords

Navigation