Abstract
Network resources are essential in resource critical environments as ad hoc wireless networks (AWNs) due to their dynamic topology and broadcasting of packets over the wireless medium without a central controller. In order to perform a routing algorithm with minimum resource consumption, an ideal ad hoc routing protocol should be designed for low consumed resources such as low power consumption. In this paper focus on ad hoc routing protocols, Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) and gossip-based routing protocols, based on selective forwarding node algorithms that reduce the control message overheads. Thus, we present performance analytical results to thoroughly evaluate the routing protocols and demonstrate our Adaptive-Gossiping method advantages over Static-Gossiping routing and OLSR protocols in densely deployed networks. This paper is an extended version of ICISA 2013 conference paper [12].
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arora D, Millman E, Neville SW (2012) Assessing the expected performance of the olsr routing protocol for denser urban core ad hoc network deployments. In Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), 2012 IEEE 26th International Conference on pp 406–414
Bettstetter C, Eberspacher J (2003) Hop distances in homogeneous ad hoc networks. In vehicular technology conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring. The 57th IEEE Semiannual vol 4. pp 2286–2290
Chen L, Heinzelman WB (2007) A survey of routing protocols that support QoS in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Network 21(6):30–38
Chen S, Nahrstedt K (1999) Distributed quality-of-service routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 17(8):1488–1505
Clausen T, Jacquet P (2003) Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR). RFC 3626, IETF Network
Corson S, Macker J (1999) Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): routing protocol performance issues and evaluating consideratins. RFC Editor
Fall K, Varadhan K (2010) ns-2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/index.html
Goyal P (2012) Simulation study of comparative performance of AODV, OLSR, FSR & LAR, routing protocols in MANET in large scale scenarios. In Information and Communication Technologies (WICT), 2012 World Congress on pp 283–286
Hass Z, Halpern JY, Li L (2006) Gossip-based ad hoc routing. IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking 14(3):479–491
Huhtonen A (2004) Comparing AODV and OLSR routing protocols. Telecommunications Software and Multimedia, pp. 1–9
Lee A, Ra I (2011) Ad Hoc routing algorithm for conserving network resources. In Proc. (ICCCT’11), Seoul, Korea pp. 269–278
Lee A, Ra I, Lavina CG, Caballero J (2013) Performance analysis of ad hoc routing protocols based on selective forwarding node algorithms. In Proc. (IEEE ICISA’13), Pattaya, Thailand, June 24–26
Penrose M (2003) Random geometric graphs. Oxford University Press, New York
Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561, IEFT Network Working Group
Toutouh J, Garcia-Nieto J, Alba E (2012) Interlligent OLSR routing protocol optimization for VANETs. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 61(4):1884–1894
Wagner T (2011) Campus QoS for voice and video. Cisco Systems. http://www.sdcug.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Campus-QoS-for-Voice-and-Video.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, A., Ra, I. Performance analysis of ad hoc routing protocols based on selective forwarding node algorithms. Multimed Tools Appl 74, 6443–6452 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2105-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2105-0