Skip to main content
Log in

A generalized relative total variation method for image smoothing

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, two piecewise smooth models L0smoothing and relative total variation (RTV) have been proposed for feature/structure-preserving filtering. One is very efficient for tackling image with little texture patterns and the other has appearance performance on image with abundant uniform textural details. In this work, we present a general relative total variation (GRTV) method, which generalizes the advantages of both approaches. The efficiency of RTV depends on the defined windowed total variation (WTV) and windowed inherent variation (WIV), which focus on edge enhancing and texture suppressing respectively. The key innovations of the presented GRTV method are to extend the norm of WTV in RTV from 1 to [0, 1] and set the norm of WIV inversely proportional to the norm of WTV. These modifications substantially improve the structure extraction ability of RTV. The presented GRTV also improves the edge-boundary enhancing ability of L0smoothing and further enables it to deal with images containing complex textural details and noises. Furthermore, the L2-norm data fidelity term replaced by L1-norm is discussed. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method presents better performance as the state-of-the-art methods do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alliney S (1992) Digital filters as absolute norm regularizers. IEEE Trans Signal Process 40(6):1548–1562

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alliney S (2004) A variational approach to remove outliers and impulse noise. J Math Imaging Vis 20(12):99–120

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bae S, Durand F (2007) Defocus magnification. Comput Graph Forum 26(3):571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bresson X, Esedoglu S, Vandergheynst P, Thiran JP, Osher SJ (2007) Fast global minimization of the active contour/snake model. J Math Imaging Vis 28(2):151–167

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Buades A, Coll B, Morel J-M (2005) A non-local algorithm for image denoising. CVPR 2:60–65

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Buades A, Le TM, Morel J-M, Vese LA (2010) Fast cartoon + texture image filters. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(8):1978–1986

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng X, Zeng M, Liu X (2014) Feature-preserving filtering with L0 gradient minimization. Comput Graph 38:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian KO (2007) Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(8):2080–2095

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Durand F, Dorsey J (2002) Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Trans Graph 21(3):257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farbman Z, Fattal R, Lischinski D, Szeliski R (2008) Edge-preserving decompositions for multi-scale tone and detail manipulation. ACM Trans Graph 27:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fattal R, Agrawala M, Rusinkiewicz S (2007) Multiscale shape and detail enhancement from multi-light image collections. ACM Trans Graph 26:3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gorodnitsky B (1997) Rao, Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45(3):600–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He K, Sun J, Tang X (2010) Guided Image Filtering. In ECCV: 1–14

  14. Karacan L, Erdem E, Erdem A (2013) Structure preserving image smoothing via region covariances. ACM Trans Graph 32(6)

  15. Liu Q, Wang S, Luo J, Zhu Y, Ye M (2012) An augmented Lagrangian approach to general dictionary learning for image denoising. J Vis Commun Image Represent 23(5):753–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolova M (2002) Minimizers of cost-functions involving nonsmooth data-fidelity terms. SIAM J Numer Anal 40(3):965–994

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Perazzi F et al. (2012) Saliency filters: Contrast based filtering for salient region detection. In CVPR

  18. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao BD, Delgado KK (1999) An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection. IEEE Trans Signal Process 47(1):187–200

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrguez P, Wohlberg B (2008) An efficient algorithm for sparse representations with lp data fidelity term, in: Proceedings of 4th IEEE Andean Technical Conference (ANDESCON)

  21. Rodrguez P, Wohlberg B (2009) Efficient minimization method for a generalized total variation functional. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(2):322–332

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Rouselle F, Knaus C, Zwicker M (2012) Adaptive rendering with non-local means filtering, ACM Trans Graph 31(6).

  23. Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E (1992) Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys D 60(1–4):259–68

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen C-T, Chang F-J, Hung Y-P, Pei S-C (2010) Edge-preserving image decomposition using L1 fidelity with L0 gradient, SIGGRAPH ASIA

  25. Tomasi C, Manduchi R (1998) Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In ICCV. 839–846

  26. Winnem¨Oller H, Olsen SC, Gooch B (2006) Real-time video abstraction. ACM Trans Graph 25(3):1221–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu L, Lu C, Xu Y, Jia J (2011) Image smoothing via L0 gradient minimization. ACM Trans Graph 30(6);174:1–174:12. doi:10.1145/2024156.2024208

  28. Xu L, Yan Q, Xia Y, Jia J (2012) Structure extraction from texture via relative total variation. ACM Trans Graph 31(6)

  29. Ye C, Tao D, Song M, Jacobs DW (2013) Sparse norm filtering, M Wu - arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.3971, 2013 - arxiv.org.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under 61362001, 62162084, 61261010, 61365013, 51165033, the Science and Technology Department of Jiangxi Province of China under 20121BBE50023, 20132BAB211030, Young Scientists Training Program of Jiangxi Province under 20133ACB21007, 20142BCB23001, International Scientific Cooperation Project of Jiangxi Province under 20141BDH80001, Jiangxi Advanced Project for Post-doctoral Research Funds under 2014KY02 and Post-doctoral Research Funds under 2014 M551867.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiegen Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Xiong, B., Yang, D. et al. A generalized relative total variation method for image smoothing. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 7909–7930 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2709-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2709-z

Keywords