Skip to main content
Log in

Improving visual quality of reversible data hiding by twice sorting

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most literatures on reversible data hiding (RDH), the visual quality of marked images is only assessed by PSNR, and the smoothness-priority-based sorting technique is efficient for improving PSNR. However, modifications in smooth areas are conflict with other criterion of visual quality such as Just Noticeable Difference (JND). To reconcile this contradiction, we propose a twice sorting scheme, in which the pixels are first sorted and divided into several levels with a smoothness criterion, and then sorted twice with JND in each level. According to the sorted order, message bits are embedded into the predicted errors of pixels based on rhombus prediction. Experimental results show that this novel method significantly outperforms previous JND-related RDH schemes on not only PSNR but also SSIM and JND distortion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bao F, Deng RH, Ooi BC et al (2005) Tailored reversible watermarking schemes for authentication of electronic clinical atlas. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 9(4):554–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Computer Vision Group, University of Granada. CVG-UGR Image Database. http://decsai.ugr.es/cvg/dbimagenes/g256.php

  3. Dragoi I-C, Coltuc D (2014) Local-prediction-based difference expansion reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(4):1779–1790

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu X, Zhang W, Hu X et al (2013) Fast estimation of optimal marked-signal distribution for reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 8(5):779–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung SW, Ha LT, Ko SJ (2011) A new histogram modification based reversible data hiding algorithm considering the human visual system. IEEE Signal Process Lett 18(2):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, Yang B, Zeng T (2011) Efficient reversible watermarking based on adaptive prediction-error expansion and pixel selection. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(12):3524–3533

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ni Z, Shi Y, Ansari N, Wei S (2006) Reversible Data Hiding. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 16(3):354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ou B, Li X, Zhao Y, Ni R, Shi Y (2013) Pairwise prediction-error expansion for efficient reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(12):5010–5012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Qin C, Chang CC, Huang YH et al (2013) An inpainting-assisted reversible steganographic scheme using a histogram shifting mechanism. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 23(7):1109–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin C, Chang CC, Liao LT (2012) An adaptive prediction-error expansion oriented reversible information hiding scheme. Pattern Recogn Lett 33(16):2166–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin C, Chang CC, Lin CC (2013) An adaptive reversible steganographic scheme based on the just noticeable distortion, multimedia tools and applications. doi:10.1007/s11042-013-1733-0

  12. Sachnev V, Kim HJ, Nam J, Suresh S, Shi YQ (2009) Reversible watermarking algorithm using sorting and prediction. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 19(7):989–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thodi D, Rodriguez J (2007) Expansion embedding techniques for reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans Image Processing 16(3):721–730

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Tian J (2003) Reversible data embedding using a difference expansion. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 13(8):890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Willems F, Maas D, Kalker T (2004) Semantic Lossless Source Coding, 42nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication. Control and Computing, Illinois, USA, pp 1411–1418

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR et al (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Watson AB (1993) DCT Quantization Matrices Visually Optimized for Individual Images. Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, Bellingham, WA , pp 202–216

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang WM, Hu XC, Yu NH et al (2013) Recursive histogram modification: establishing equivalency between reversible data hiding and lossless data compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(7):2775–2785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang WM, Chen B, Yu NH et al (2012) Improving various reversible data hiding schemes via optimal codes for binary covers. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(6):2991–3003

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and insightful suggestions to improve the paper quality.

This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61170234, by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant XDA06030600, by the Funding of Science and Technology on Information Assurance Laboratory under Grant KJ-13-02, by the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Anhui University under Grant J01001319, and by the Backbone Teacher Training Program of Anhui University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiming Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Zhang, W., Hu, X. et al. Improving visual quality of reversible data hiding by twice sorting. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 13663–13678 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2824-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2824-x

Keywords

Navigation