Skip to main content
Log in

Distance perception of a virtual sound source synthesized near the listener position

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on the challenges faced in attempts to synthesize virtual sound sources near the listener position due to the differences between sound fields of real and virtual sound sources, especially if virtual sources reproduced by a line array of loudspeakers are to be positioned within the arm’s reach of the listener. Distance perception has been described by various acoustical parameters, such as loudness, power spectrum, and direct-to-reverberant energy ratio; however, ILD has been considered as a strong distance cue when the source to be positioned near the listener and at an azimuth angle well offset from the median plane. The ILD observed in a sound field reproduced by a loudspeaker array is inevitably different from that of a real sound source due to several reproduction artifacts. Using a rigid sphere as a model of human’s head within 1 m, we demonstrate how the ILD is influenced by the reproduction artifacts of a line array. Observing the ILD resulting for various virtual source locations shows that the acoustical cues to perceive distance are not well-reproduced in general; however, there are regions of virtual source locations near the listener within which correct ILDs can be provided. Some local minima in magnitude in space induce large ILD values at particular spatial positions through truncation of the array which results in virtual sources being positioned at extremely close range to the listener.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahrens J, Spors S (2008) Focusing of virtual sound sources in higher order ambisonics. In: Proc of the 124th Audio Eng Soc Conv, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, preprint 7378

  2. Berkhout AJ (1988) A holographic approach to acoustic control. J Audio Eng Soc 36:977–995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blauert J (1997) Spatial hearing: the psychophysics of human sound localization, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boone MM, Verheijen E, Jansen.G (1996) Virtual reality by sound reproduction based on wave field synthesis. In: Proc of the 100th Audio Eng Soc Conv, Copenhagen, Denmark, preprint 4145

  5. Bronkhorst AW, Houtgast T (1999) Auditory distance perception in rooms. Lett Nat 397:517–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brungart DS, Rabinowitz WM (1999) Auditory localization of nearby sources. head-related transfer functions. J Acoust Soc Am 106(3):1465–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brungart DS, Rabinowitz WM (1999) Auditory localization of nearby sources. II. Localization of a broadband source. J Acoust Soc Am 106(4):1956–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brungart DS, Rabinowitz WM (1999) Auditory localization of nearby sources. III. Stimulus effects. J Acoust Soc Am 106(6):3589–3602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brungart DS, Rabinowitz WM, Durlach N (1996) Auditory localization of a nearby point source. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JW, Kim YH (2012) Integral approach for reproduction of virtual sound source surrounded by loudspeaker array. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 20(7):1976–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JW, Kim YH (2013) Sound field reproduction of a virtual source inside a loudspeaker array with minimal external radiation. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 21(2):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman PD (1963) An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space. Psychol Bull 60(3):302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniel J (2003) Spatial sound encoding including near field effect: introducing distance coding filters and a viable, new ambisonic format. In: Proc of the 23rd Audio Eng Soc Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark

  14. Duda RO, Martens WL (1998) Range dependence of the response of a spherical head model. J Acoust Soc Am 104(5):3048–3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fazi FM (2010) Sound field reproduction. Dissertation, University of Southampton

  16. Fink M (1997) Time-reversal acoustics. Phys Today 50(3):34–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Geier M, Wierstorf H, Ahrens J, Wechsung I, Raake A, Spors S (2010) Perceptual evaluation of focused sources in wave field synthesis. In: Proc of the 128th Audio Eng Soc Conv, London, UK, preprint 8069

  18. Hartley R, Fry T (1921) The binaural location of pure tones. Phys Rev 18:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang DS, Choi JW, Kim YH, Martens WL (2014) Distance perception of a nearby virtual sound source reproduced by a linear loudspeaker array. In: Proc of inter-noise2014, Melbourne, Australia

  20. Kim YH, Choi JW (2013) Sound visualization and manipulation. Wiley, Singapore, pp 320–332

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopco N, Santarelli S, Best V, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2007) Simulating distance cues in virtual reverberant environments. In: Proc of Int Congress on Acoust, Madrid, Spain

  22. Kopco N, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2011) Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources. J Acoust Soc Am 130(3):1530–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Menzies D (2009) Calculation of near-field head transfer functions using point source representations. In: Proc of Ambisonics Symp, Graz, Austria

  24. Merson DH, King LE (1975) Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance. Percept Psychophys 18:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Møller H, Sørensen M, Hammershøi D, Jensen CB (1995) Head-related transfer functions of human subjects. J Audio Eng Soc 43:300–320

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nielsen S (1991) Distance perception in hearing. Dissertation, Aalborg University

  27. Oldfield R, Drumm I (2014) The focal shift phenomenon for focused source reproduction using loudspeaker arrays. In: Proc of 137th Audio Eng Soc Conv, LA, USA, preprint 9099

  28. Shaw E (1974) Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. J Acoust Soc Am 56:1848–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shinn-Cunningham BG, Kopco N, Martin TJ (2005) Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. J Acoust Soc Am 117(5):3100–3115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simpson WE, Stanton LD (1973) Head movement does not facilitate perception of the distance of a source of sound. Am J Psychol 86(1):151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Song MH, Choi JW, Kim YH (2012) A selective array activation method for the generation of a focused source considering listening position. J Acoust Soc Am 131:EL156–EL162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Spors S (2007) Extension of an analytic secondary source selection criterion for wave field synthesis. In: Proc of the 123rd Audio Eng Soc Conv, New York, USA, preprint 7299

  33. Spors S, Ahrens J (2010) Reproduction of focused sources by the spectral division method. In: Proc of the 4th Int Symp on Communications, Control and Signal Process (ISCCSP)

  34. Spors S, Wierstorf H, Geier M, Ahrens J (2009) Physical and perceptual properties of focused sources in wave field synthesis. In: Proc of the 127th Audio Eng Soc Conv, New York, USA, preprint 7914

  35. Start E (1997) Direct sound enhancement by wave field synthesis. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, pp 45–64

  36. Stewart G (1911) The acoustic shadow of a rigid sphere with certain applications in architectural acoustics and audition. Phys Rev 33:467–479

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stewart G (1911) Phase relations in the acoustic shadow of a rigid sphere; phase difference at the ears. Phys Rev 34:252–258

    Google Scholar 

  38. Verheijen ENG (1997) Sound reproduction by wave field synthesis. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology

  39. Weyl H (1919) Ausbreitung electromagnetischer wellen uber einem ebenen Leiter. Ann Phys 60:481–500

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Wierstorf H, Geier M, and Spors S (2010) Reducing artifacts of focused sources in wave field synthesis. In: Proc of the 129th Audio Eng Soc Conv, San Francisco, CA, USA, preprint 8245

  41. Wierstorf H, Raake A, Geier M, Spors S (2013) Perception of focused sources in wave field synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 61(1/2):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  42. Williams EG (1999) Fourier acoustics: spatial radiation and nearfield acoustical holography. Academic Press, London, Eq. (6.24), pp 187

  43. Wittek H, Kerber S, Rumsey F, Theile G (2004) Spatial perception in wave field synthesis rendered sound fields: Distance of real and virtual nearby sources. In: Proc of the 116th Audio Eng Soc Conv, Berlin, Germany, preprint 6000

  44. Zahorik P (2002) Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 111(4):1832–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) grant funded by the Korea government (No. 10037244), and the BK21 (Brain Korea 21) project initiated by the Ministry of Education, and Unmanned Technology Research Center (UTRC) at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), originally funded by DAPA, ADD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Woo Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, DS., Choi, JW. & Martens, W.L. Distance perception of a virtual sound source synthesized near the listener position. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 5161–5182 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2878-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2878-9

Keywords

Navigation