Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Orientation judgment for abstract paintings

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artists decide the orientation at which an abstract painting should be hung based on their ideas, but the correct orientation is not obvious to other viewers. Some studies have found that abstract paintings at the correct orientations generally get higher aesthetic ratings from viewers. This encourages us to deal with the problem of orientation judgment for abstract paintings through machine learning. First, we design a group of methods to extract features from paintings based on the theories in abstract art. Then a machine leaning framework is proposed using Naive Bayes classifier and BP neural network classifier for training and orientation testing. Experiments show that it can classify abstract paintings into up and non-up ones with performance comparable to human. This is the first work of orientation judgment for abstract paintings through computer simulation, and the results demonstrate the validity of abstract art theories used for feature definition. This work provides a new scheme for exploring the relationship between aesthetic quality of abstract paintings and their computational visual features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amirshahi S, Koch M, Denzler J, Redies C (2012) Phog analysis of self-similarity in esthetic images. In: Proceedings of SPIE (HVEI XVII), vol 8291, p 82911J

  2. Arnheim R (2004) Visual Thinking, 1st Edn. University of California Press. 30-5th Anniversary Printing edition

  3. Barla A, Franceschi E, Odone F, Verri A (2002) Image kernels. In: Lee SW, Verri A (eds) Pattern Recognition with Support Vector Machines, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2388, pp 83–96. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch A, Tisserman A, Munoz X (2007) Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel. In: Proceedings of CIVR 2007

  5. Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Schmid C, Soatto S, Tomasi C (eds) International Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 886–893. INRIA Rhône-Alpes, ZIRST-655, av. de l’Europe, Montbonnot-38334. http://lear.inrialpes.fr/pubs/2005/DT05

  6. Datta R, Joshi D, Li J, Wang JZ (2006) Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), vol 3, pp 288–301

  7. Gossweiler R, Kamvar M, Baluja S (2009) What’s up captcha? a captcha based on image orientation. In: In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2), pp 841–850. ACM

  8. Hedges S (2008) Image analysis of renaissance copperplate prints. Computer image analysis in the study of art 6810

  9. Hollitt C, Deeb AS (2012) Determining image orientation using the hough and fourier transforms. In: Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, IVCNZ’12, Dunedin, New Zealand - November 26 – 28, 2012, pp 346–351. doi:10.1145/2425836.2425904

  10. Irfan M, Stork D (2009) Multiple visual features for the computer authentication of jackson pollock’s drip paintings: Beyond box-counting and fractals. SPIE Electronic Imaging: Machine vision applications II 7251

  11. Isola P, Xiao J, Torralba A, Oliva A (2011) What makes an image memorable?. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp 145–152

  12. Jiang S, Huang Q, Ye Q, Gao W (2006) An effective method to detect and categorize digitized traditional chinese paintings. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:734–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson MG, Muday JA, S JA (2010) When viewing variations in paintings by mondrian aesthetic preferences correlate with pupil size. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4(3):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones-Smith K, Mathur H (2006) Revisiting pollock’s drip paintings. Nature 444:E9—E10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kandinsky W (2012) Point and line to plane. Dover Publications

  16. Ke Y, Tang X, Jing F (2006) The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recogn., vol 1, pp 419–426

  17. Latto R, Brain D, Kelly B (2000) An oblique effect in aesthetics: Homage to mondrian. Perception 29(8):981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Chen T (2009) Aesthetic visual quality assessment of paintings. IEEE Journal Of Selected Topics In Signal Processing 3(2):236–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindauer MS (1969) The orientation of form in abstract art. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 4(1):475–476

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyu S (2005) Automatic image orientation determination with natural image statistics. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pp 491–494. ACM

  21. Machajdik J, Hanbury A (2010) Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, MM ’10, pp 83–92. doi:10.1145/1873951.1873965. ACM, New York

  22. Mallon B, Redies C, Hayn-Leichsenring GU (2014) Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast and statistical properties. Front Hum Neurosci 8

  23. Marchesotti L, Perronnin F, Larlus D, Csurka G (2011) Assessing the aesthetic quality of photographs using generic image descriptors. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

  24. Mather G (2012) Aesthetic judgement of orientation in modern art. Perception 3:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Plumhoff JE, Schirillo JA (2009) Mondrian, eye movements, and the oblique effect. Perception 38(5):719–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Redies C, Amirshahi SA, Koch M, Denzler J (2012) Phog-derived aesthetic measures applied to color photographs of artworks, natural scenes and objects. In: ECCV 2012, vol. Part I, LNCS 7583, pp 522–531

  27. Sartori A, Yanulevskaya V, Salah AA, Uijlings J, Bruni E, Sebe N (2015) Affective analysis of professional and amateur abstract paintings using statistical analysis and art theory. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 5(2):8:1–8:27. doi:10.1145/2768209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shahram M, Stork D, Donoho D (2008) Recovering layers of brush strokes through statistical analysis of color and shape: An application to van gogh’s self portrait with grey felt hat. Computer image analysis in the study of art 6810:68,100D–1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stork DG (2009) Computer vision and computer graphics analysis of paintings and drawings: An introduction to the literature. In: CAIP 2009, vol LNCS 5702, pp 9–24

  30. Taylor RP, Micolich AP, Jonas D (1999) Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings. Nature 399:422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yanulevskaya V, Uijlings J, Bruni E, Sartori A, Zamboni E, Bacci F, Melcher D, Sebe N (2012) In the eye of the beholder: Employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintings. In: MM’12

  32. Zhao S, Gao Y, Jiang X, Yao H, Chua TS, Sun X (2014) Exploring principles-of-art features for image emotion recognition. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM’14, pp 47–56. doi:10.1145/2647868.2654930. ACM, New York

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with project No. 61172104.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automation, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China

    Jia Liu

  2. LIAMA-NLPR, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Jia Liu, Weiming Dong & Xiaopeng Zhang

  3. Image processing Center, School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing, China

    Zhiguo Jiang

Authors
  1. Jia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weiming Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaopeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiguo Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Dong, W., Zhang, X. et al. Orientation judgment for abstract paintings. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 1017–1036 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3104-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3104-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation