Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Research on an optimal selection method for sensor network node under high-speed mobile environment

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional selection methods for the selection of sensor network node under high-speed mobile environment is randomness, which cannot effectively use the multiple attributes of nodes, resulting in the irregular distribution of cluster head of nodes, and high energy consumption. An optimal selection method for sensor network node under the high-speed mobile environment based on EERNFS and Naive Bayesian Networks is proposed. By using EERNFS algorithm within each network intercept / sleep cycle, the sensor network node is made processing under high-speed mobile environment, to ensure the stable local connectivity and consistent collaboration intercepts, and reduces energy consumption. Naive Bayes algorithm is used to make optimization of general Bayesian classification method, and set the parameters. In the two-dimensional area, several sensor nodes are randomly placed, and the known two-dimensional area is divided. A certain node is selected arbitrarily in different regions to constitute the original set of Naive Bayes algorithm, and compute the training results and thresholds in the Bayesian system of node set at this moment. On the basis of the threshold, the optimal selection of sensor network node is achieved. Simulation results show that the proposed method not only has higher node coverage, but also the operating efficiency and energy consumption are better than the genetic method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bas CU, Ergen SC (2013) Ultra-wideband channel model for intra-vehicular wireless sensor networks beneath the chassis: from statistical model to simulations. IEEE 1(62):14–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouabana A, Sourkounis C (2013) Analysis of a measurement system in respect to the dependency of the current sensor sampling rate and the inverter switching time. IEEE (39) 3877–3882

  3. Chang C-C, Hsu T-E (2014) The study of micro-bridge structure PZT underwater ultrasonic sensors with Al sacrificial layer. IEEE 8(5):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng VW, Wang T-Y (2012) Performance analysis of distributed decision fusion using a multilevel censoring scheme in wireless sensor networks. IEEE 4(61):1610–1619

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheymol G, Gusarov A, Gaillot S et al. (2013) Dimensional measurements under high radiation with optical fibre sensors based on white light interferometry - report on irradiation tests. IEEE (3):1–7

  6. Choudhary H, Kumar A, Bahl R et al. (2013) Enhanced passive acoustic localization with an array of non-identical sensors using blind Gauss-Markov estimate. IEEE (8) 1–6

  7. Clark DA (2010) Correction of electric and magnetic fields and gradients measured within and around an insulating sensor capsule in seawater. IEEE 10(9):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Efros AA, Narasimhan SG (2009) Estimating natural illumination from a single outdoor image. ICCV 5(8):183–190

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gosiewski Z, Kulesza Z (2013) Virtual collocation of sensors and actuators for a flexible rotor supported by active magnetic bearings. IEEE 2(9):94–99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapoor NK, Majumdar S, Nandy B et al. (2012) Sensor allocation to multiple applications in shared wireless sensor networks. IEEE (31) 197–198

  11. Kembhavi A, Harwood D, Davis LS (2009) Human detection using partial least squares analysis. ICCV 5(6):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim Y, Sim J-Y, Kim C-S (2015) Spatiotemporal saliency detection for video sequences based on random walk with restart. TIP 5(11):2552–2564

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar D, Sarma H, Rai P et al (2014) Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile node. IEEE (8) 1–6

  14. Kumar AA, Sivalingam KM (2012) Target tracking in a WSN with directional sensors using electronic beam steering. IEEE (9) 1–10

  15. Lee H, Kim B, Kwon Y et al. (2015) The comparison of RBS and TDP for the sensor networks synchronization. JIPS (8) 5–10

  16. Levy R, Papin G, Le Traon O et al. (2014) A high resolution vibrating beam accelerometer working in nonlinear region for seismic ground sensor application. IEEE (8) 1–3

  17. Li G, Yang D, Li R, Cai M, Li C, Wang L (2014) Mold flow analysis of molding process for a MEMS fingerprint sensor package. IEEE 2(15):1534–1538

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu T, Wang G, Chan KL (2015) Video tracking using learned hierarchical features. TIP 3(2):1424–1435

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Z, Yang J (2009) Sparsity induced similarity measure for label propagation. ICCV 12(20):317–324

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meti SA, Sangam VG (2015) Biological sensor performance validation using fusion technique. IEEE (5) 1158–1163

  21. Nowozin S (2009) On feature combination for multiclass object classification. ICCV 9(25):221–228

    Google Scholar 

  22. Obeid S, Dogaru T (2015) Improvement on printed circuit board inspection using injected AC current and GMR magnetic sensor. IEEE (25) 150–154

  23. Rella MA, Galletti D, Maguer A, Stoner R, Molinari E (2011) Assessment of CTD and optical sensor calibration differences between standalone sensors and those mounted within an undersea glider. IEEE 6(8):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singh V (2009) An efficient algorithm for co-segmentation. ICCV 9(12):269–276

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Jeong, H.Y. Research on an optimal selection method for sensor network node under high-speed mobile environment. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 19635–19647 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3234-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3234-9

Keywords

Navigation