Skip to main content
Log in

A hierarchical algorithm for phalangeal and epiphyseal/metaphyseal segmentation

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Computerized bone age assessment was widely studied for the physicians and radiologists to evaluate children with endocrinological disorders, growth retardation and treatment monitoring. Unfortunately, the morphological assessment of phalanges and epiphyseal/metaphyseal region (EMROIs) in hand radiogram with non-uniform intensity or full of the noise is intricacies and hardly to be segmented, and which was also time-consuming. So, a new segmentation technique for handy skeleton was proposed. The first step, the properties of position and brightness on phalanges and EMORIs are analyzed by a series of image preprocessing procedures. Next, 14 EMORIs of five phalanges were examined by the sum-variance (SV) scheme for the 100 boys and 100 girls. Last, four statistical indices are used to evaluate the segmentation. The experiment performance is shown the better result than the gradient vector flow (GVF) snake, and the approximation of adaptive two-means clustering. The study showed the proposed hierarchical algorithm for the extraction and segmentation of phalangeal bone regions of interests (PROIs) and EMROIs are effective, especially for the EMROIs segmentation by using the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhan A (2014) Parametric models for segmentation of Cardiac MRI database with geometrical interpretation. In: Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), 2014 International Conference on IEEE, pp 711–715

  2. Buckler JM (1983) How to make the most of bone ages. Arch Dis Child 58:761–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chai HY, Tan TS, Gan HS, Lai KW (2013) Multipurpose contrast enhancement on epiphyseal plates and ossification centers for bone age assessment. Biomed Eng Online 12(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis LM, Theobald BJ, Lines J (2012) On the segmentation and classification of hand radiographs. Int J Neural Syst 22(05):1250020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferdinand H, Inga B, Heike R, Thomas D, Hauke S (2013) Bone age assessment using the classifying generalized hough transform. In: Pattern Recognit. Springer, Berlin, pp 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferdinand H, Gordon B, Thomas MD (2014) Epiphyses localization for bone age assessment using the discriminative generalized hough transform. In: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano D, Spampinato C, Scarciofalo G, Leonardi R (2010) An automatic system for skeletal bone age measurement by robust processing of carpal and epiphysial/metaphysial bones. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(10):2539–2553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greulich WW, Pyle S (1971) Radiographic, atlas of skeletal development of hand wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Standford

  9. Harmsen M, Fischer B, Schramm H, Seidl T (2013) Support vector machine classification based on correlation prototypes applied to bone age assessment. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 17(1):190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsieh CW, Jong TL, Tiu CM (2007) Bone age estimation based on phalanx information with fuzzy constrain of carpals. Med Biol Eng Comput 45(3):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh CW, Liu TC, Jong TL, Chen CY, Tiu CM, Chan DY (2011) Fast and fully automatic phalanx segmentation using a grayscale-histogram morphology algorithm. Opt Eng 50(8):087007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh CW, Chen CY, Jong TL, Liu TC, Chiu CH (2012) Automatic segmentation of phalanx and epiphyseal/metaphyseal region by gamma parameter enhancement algorithm. Meas Sci Rev 12(1):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JS (1981) Refined filtering of image noise using local statistics. Comput Graphs Image Process 15:380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehmann TM, Beier D, Thies C, Seidl T (2005) Segmentation of medical images combining local, regional, global, and hierarchical distances into a bottom-up region merging scheme. In: Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 546–555

  15. Lin HH, Shu SG, Lin YH, Yu SS (2012) Bone age cluster assessment and feature clustering analysis based on phalangeal image rough segmentation. Pattern Recogn 45(1):322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ostu NA (1979) Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pietka E, Gertych A, Pospiech S, Cao F, Huang HK, Gilsanz V (2001) Computer-assisted bone age assessment: image preprocessing and epiphyseal. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(8):715–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poznanski A, Hernandez R, Guire K, Bereza U, Garn S (1978) Carpal length in children–a useful measurement in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and some concenital malformation syndromes. Radiology 129(3):661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruppertshofen H (2013) Automatic modeling of anatomical variability for object localization in medical images. BoD-Books on Demand

  20. Sezgin M, Sankur B (2004) Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron Imaging 13(1):146–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanner JM, Healy MRJ, Goldstein H (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 Method). Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thangam P, Thanushkodi K, Mahendiran TV (2013) PSO for graph-based segmentation of wrist bones in bone age assessment. Int J Comput Commun 8(1):153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD (2009) The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(1):52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Yen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsieh, CW., Liu, HC., Jong, TL. et al. A hierarchical algorithm for phalangeal and epiphyseal/metaphyseal segmentation. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 3047–3063 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3278-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3278-5

Keywords

Navigation