Abstract
In TV broadcasting deaf people are not able to get information from the audio content. In public television, some programs may be accompanied by a sign language interpreter as a part of the broadcasted signal. As a supplementary service, it would enable more programs to be accessible with a sign language interpreter to assist in comprehension. To be able to transmit such data flow separately, we define the parameters of compression of sign language interpreter image to ensure intelligibility and quality while maintaining low bitrate. This paper deals with specific video compression of Czech sign language interpreter based on regions of interest implemented to the ×264 open source library. The results of this approach are verified in subjective tests with the deaf and hearing evaluators. The experiments examine the intelligibility of sign language expressions containing minimal pairs for different levels of image compression and also evaluate the subjective quality of the final image.







Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
Video compression standard by the ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) originally designed as a low-bit-rate format for videoconferencing.
Haar features indicate regularities (some similar properties) shared by all human faces.
References
Agrafiotis D et al. (2006) A perceptually optimised video coding system for sign language communication at lowbit rates. Signal Process Image Commun 21(7):531–549
Cavender A, et al (2006) Mobile ASL:: intelligibility of sign language video as constrained by mobile phone technology, in Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Portland, October 22–25), 71–78
Ciaramello FM, Hemami SS (2011) A computational intelligibility model for assessment and compression of American sign language video. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(11):3014–3027
Emmorey K, Thompson R, Colvin R (2009) Eye gaze during comprehension of American sign language by native and beginning signers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 14(2):237–243
Freund Y, Shapire R (1995) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computational Learning Theory, 23–33
HbbTV official websites http://www.hbbtv.org/. Accessed 10 Dec 2015
ITU-R Recommendation BT.500–13 (2012c) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Technical report
Laidler CH (2010) Open mobile video communication for the deaf. Dissertation, University of Cape Town
Mittal A, Zisserman A, Torr PH (2011) Hand detection using multiple proposals. In British Machine Vision Conference, pp 1–11
Nakazono K, Nagashima Y, Ichikawa A (2006) Digital encoding applied to sign language video. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E89-D(6):1893–1900
Sign language translation services - HBB4ALL, http://www.hbb4all.eu/home/hbb4allpilots/pilot-d-sign-language-translation-service/.
Svachula Z, Bernas M, Zatloukal P, Klabanova L (2013) Investigation of Regions of Interest for Deaf in Czech Sign Language Content. IJSWS 3, 44–49
The results of the sample survey of disabled people in 2007. (Czech statistical office, 2008), http://www.czso.cz/csu/2008edicniplan.nsf/p/3309-08. Accessed 1 Nov 2015
Viola P, Jones MJ (2004) Robust real-time face detection. Int J Comput Vis 57:137–154
Zatloukal P, Bernas M, Dvorak L (2014) Independent transmission of sign language interpreter in DVB: assessment of image compression, In Seventh International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2014)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No. SGS15/089/OHK3/1 T/13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zatloukal, P., Bernas, M. Optimized H.264 compression of sign language video. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 16225–16237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3905-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3905-1