Skip to main content
Log in

Filmic framing in video games: a comparative analysis of screen space design

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The screen space, also known as the eye space of players, is the main component of game design in that it has not only direct interactions with players but also profound impacts on gameplay. Screen space design in games appears to adopt multiple conventions from film theory; however, discussions of the influences or rules related to these patterns are rare. Therefore, the main question of this article concerns the possible relevance of framing the screen space in films and video games, primarily by the means of content analysis comparison. Games have a cross-disciplinary nature. In order to discover their unique mechanics, possibilities, and trends; this research, based on cinematic framing techniques, uses a qualitative descriptive approach to analyze the design and strategy of the visual perspective that is determined by monitors in popular and classic games. This work also attempts to identify the commonalities and differences between games and movies. It is hoped that this research will serve as a reference for future studies and provide some insights into both game design and other visual multimedia applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarseth E (1997) Cybertext: perspectives on ergodic literature. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aarseth E (2001) Computer game studies, year one. Game Studies 1(1):1–15

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams E, Dormans J (2012) Game mechanics: advanced game design. New Riders Games, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arjoranta J (2015) Narrative tools for games : focalization, granularity, and the mode of narration in games. Games and Culture. doi:10.1177/1555412015596271

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arsenault D, Côté P-M, Larochelle A (2015) The game FAVR: a framework for the analysis of visual representation in video games. Loading The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association 9(14):88–123

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bordwell D, Thompson K (2008) Film art: an introduction, 8th edn. Mcgraw-Hill College, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown B (2011) Cinematography: theory and practice: image making for cinematographers and directors, 2nd edn. Focal Press, China

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang Y-C, Hsieh C-M (2017) Eye space: an analytical framework for the screen-mediated relationship in video games. Art and Design Review 5:84–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Kalay Y (2008) Making a Liveable 'Place': content Design in Virtual Environments. Int J Herit Stud 14(3):229–246. doi:10.1080/13527250801953710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis SB (2002) Interacting with pictures: film, narrative and interaction. Digital Creativity 13(2):71–84. doi:10.1076/digc.13.2.71.3202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Nasr MS, Yan S (2006) Visual Attention in 3D Video Games. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology. ACM doi:10.1145/1178823.1178849

  12. Friedman A (2014) The role of visual Design in Game Design. Games and Culture 10(3):291–305. doi:10.1177/1555412014559977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galloway A (2006) Gaming : essays on algorithmic culture, vol 18. University of Minnesota Press, London, Electronic Mediations

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaynor S (2013) Techniques for In-level storytelling. AAA Level Design in a Day Bootcamp, Game Developers Conference (GDC)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giannetti L (2001) Understanding movies, 9th edition, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  16. Girina I (2013) Video game Mise-en-scene remediation of cinematic codes in video games. In: Koenitz H, Sezen TI, Ferri G, Haahr M, Sezen D, C̨atak G (eds) interactive storytelling: 6th international conference, ICIDS 2013, Istanbul, Turkey, November 6–9, 2013. Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 45–54. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones M (2005) Composing space: cinema and computer gaming - the macro-Mise en scene and spatial composition. Paper presented at the imaginary worlds symposium. Sydney, Australia, December

    Google Scholar 

  18. Joseph M (1998) The five C's of cinematography - motion picture filming techniques. Silman-James, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Juul J (2001) Games telling stories? -a brief note on games and narratives. Game Studies 1(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katz SD (1991) Film directing: shot by shot: visualizing from concept to screen. Michael Wiese Productions, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lakin CS (2014) Shoot your novel: cinematic techniques to supercharge your writing. Ubiquitous Press, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Logas H, Muller D (2005) Mise-en-scène Applied to Level Design: Adapting a Holistic Approach to Level Design. In: Proceedings of the 2005 DiGRA international conference: changing views: worlds in play, Vancouver, CA, June 16-20 2005

  23. Manovich L (2001) The language of new media. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mateas M, Stern A (2005) Build it to understand it: ludology meets narratology in game design space. In: DiGRA - Changing Views: Worlds in Play, Vancouver, Canada, June 16-20:2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mateas M, Stern A (2006) Interaction and narrative. In: Salen K, Zimmerman E (eds) The game design reader: a rules of play anthology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 642–669

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mercado G (2013) The Filmmaker's eye: learning (and breaking) the rules of cinematic composition. Taylor & Francis, New York and London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morris S (2002) First-person shooters - a game apparatus. In: King G, Krzywinska T (eds) Screenplay: cinema/videogames/interfaces. Wallflower Press, London, pp 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  28. Natkin S (2010) Interactivity in games: the Player's engagement. In: Nakatsu R, Tosa N, Naghdy F, Wong KW, Codognet P (eds) Second IFIP TC 14 entertainment computing symposium, ECS 2010. Australia. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 160–168. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15214-6_16

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nitsche M (2005) Games, Montage, and the First Person Point of View. Paper presented at the DiGRA - Changing Views: Worlds in Play, Vancouver, CA, June 16–20

  30. Nitsche M (2008) Video game spaces: image, play, and structure in 3D worlds. MIT Press, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Nitsche M, Fitzpatrick R, Ashmore C, Kelly J, Hankinson W, Margenau K (2006) Designing Procedural Game Spaces: A Case Study Paper presented at the Proceedings of FuturePlay 2006, Ontario, London, October 10–12

  32. Papale L (2014) Beyond identification: defining the relationships between player and avatar. Journal of Games Criticism 1(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  33. Persson P (1998) A comparative study of digital and cinematic space with special focus on navigational issues. Towards a Framework for Design and Evaluation of Navigation in Electronic Spaces. Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Sweden, Exploring Navigation

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sicart M (2008) Defining game mechanics. Game Studies 8(2):1604–7982

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stadler J, McWilliam K (2009) Screen media: Analysing film and television. Allen & Unwin, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stadler J, McWilliam K (2009) Screen media: Analysing film and television. Allen & Unwin, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas D, Haussmann G (2005) Cinematic Camera as Videogame Cliché. In: DiGEA - Changing Views: Worlds in Play, June 16-20:2005

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson R, Bowen CJ (2009) Grammar of the shot, second edition, 2nd edn. Focal Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Town C, Sinclair D (2003) A self-referential perceptual InferenceFramework for video interpretation. In: Crowley J, Piater J, Vincze M, Paletta L (eds) Computer vision systems: third international conference, ICVS 2003. Graz, Austria, Springer, pp 54–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Tumminello W (2004) Exploring storyboarding. Design Concepts, Cengage Learning, Clifton Park

    Google Scholar 

  41. Villarejo A (2007) Film studies: the basics. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wolf MJP (2011) Theorizing navigable space in video games. Digarec Series 06

  43. Wolf MJP (2001) Space in the video game. In: Wolf MJP (ed) The medium of the video game. University of Texas Press, USA, pp 51–75

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wood A (2012) Recursive space: play and creating space. Games and Culture 7(1):87–105. doi:10.1177/1555412012440310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zagal JP, Mateas M (2010) Time in video games: a survey and analysis. Simulation and Gaming. doi:10.1177/1046878110375594

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the committee members, in particular Dr. I-Ping Chen and Dr. Shih-Kai Chung for their insightful remarks and providing enlightenment and critique on an earlier version of this manuscript. We are also very grateful to the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive suggestions for improving the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Ching Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, YC., Hsieh, CM. Filmic framing in video games: a comparative analysis of screen space design. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 6531–6554 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4564-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4564-6

Keywords

Navigation