Skip to main content
Log in

Quantization and security enabled compressive video CODEC for WSN

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real time image and video transmission in surveillance applications need efficient video coding and security. Recent advances in computer vision have enabled the development of highly secured compressive video codec framework based on compressed sensing (CS) for video surveillance. This paper presents an efficient quantization and security enabled compressive video codec (QSCVC) framework compatible for wireless multimedia sensor networks. QSCVC focuses on secured transmission of the quantized CS measurements using scrambling. The security is ensured by the key controlled scrambler and descrambler algorithm used at the encoder and decoder respectively. On an average saving percentage of the QSCVC framework with quantization exceeds 13.19% without quantization and it is also observed that an average data rate of 736 Kbps is achieved. It is also proved that there is a 97.54% reduction in transmission energy when compared with raw frame transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz IF, Melodia T, Chowdhury KR (2007) A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Comput Netw 51(4):921–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angayarkanni V, Radha S (2016) Design of Bandwidth Efficient Compressed Sensing Based Prediction Measurement Encoder for Video Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks. Wirel Pers Commun 88(3):553–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aruna N, Angayarkanni V, Radha S (2015) Compressed sensing based quantization with prediction encoding for video transmission in WSN. IEEE International Conference on Computation of Power, Energy Information and Commuincation (ICCPEIC), 2015

  4. Baig Y, Lai EM-K, Lewis JP (2010) Quantization effects on compressed sensing video. IEEE 17th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT)

  5. Baraniuk RG (2007) Compressive sensing [lecture notes]. IEEE Signal Process Mag 24(4):118–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhanu B, Ravishankar CV, Roy-Chowdhury AK, Aghajan H, Terzopoulos D (2011) Distributed video sensor networks. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Boufounos PT, Jacques L, Krahmer F, Saab R (2015) Quantization and compressive sensing. In: Compressed sensing and its applications. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 193–237

  8. Cai TT, Wang L (2011) Orthogonal matching pursuit for sparse signal recovery with noise. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 57(7):4680–4688

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chikkerur S, Sundaram V, Reisslein M, Karam LJ (2011) Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison. IEEE Trans Broadcasting 57(2):165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai YY, Rui XH, Zhao XY (2016) Design of the Quantization Matrix in the Distributed Compressed Sensing Video Coding. Journal of Computer and Communications 4:16–23. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2016.45003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng J-M, Krahmer F (2014) An RIP-based approach to Σ∆ quantization for compressed sensing. IEEE Signal Process Lett 21(11):1351–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamza R, Titouna F (2016) A novel sensitive image encryption algorithm based on the Zaslavsky chaotic map. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2016.1212954

  13. Hamza R, Muhammad K, Lv Z, Titouna F (2017) Secure video summarization framework for personalized wireless capsule endoscopy. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.03.011

  14. Karahanouglu NB, Erdogan H (2012) A* Orthogonal matching pursuit: Best first search for compressed sensing signal recovery. Digital Signal processing 22(4):555–568

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Nandhini SA, Sankararajan R, Rajendiran K (2015) Video Compressed Sensing framework for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks using a combination of multiple matrices. Computers & Electrical Engineering 44:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neggazi M, Hamami L, Amira A (2014) Efficient compressive sensing on the shimmer platform for fall detection. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)

  17. Padilla-Lopez JR, Chaaraoui AA, Florez-Revuelta F (2015) Visual privacy protection methods: A survey. Expert Syst Appl 42(9):4177–4195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pudlewski S, Prasanna A, Melodia T (2012) Compressed-sensing-enabled video streaming for wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 11(6):1060–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shirazinia A, Chatterjee S, Skoglund M (2014) Analysis-by-synthesis-based quantization of compressed sensing measurements. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.7651

  20. Tong L et al (2011) Compressive sensing based video scrambling for privacy protection. Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), IEEE

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H, Simoncelli E (2004) Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEE Trans Image Processing 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yunus F, Sharifah HS, Ariffin SK, Ismail NS (2013) Optimum parameters for mpeg-4 data over wireless sensor network. Int J Eng Technol 5(5):4501–4513

  23. Zhang X, Zhao Z (2014) Chaos-based image encryption with total shuffling and bidirectional diffusion. Nonlinear Dynamics 75(1–2):319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1068-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angayarkanni Veeraputhiran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veeraputhiran, A., Sankararajan, R. Quantization and security enabled compressive video CODEC for WSN. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 15677–15694 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5140-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5140-9

Keywords

Navigation