Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Running time analysis of the Pareto archived evolution strategy on pseudo-Boolean functions

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms have long been quite successfully applied to solve multi-objective optimization problems. However, theoretical analysis of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) is mainly restricted to the simple evolutionary multi-objective optimizer (SEMO). The Pareto archived evolution strategy (PAES) is a simple but important multi-objective evolutionary algorithm which is come from the study of telecommunication problems, and it has been successfully applied to many optimization problems, such as image processing and signal processing. In this paper, we make a first step toward studying the rigorous running time analysis for PAES. We show that the PAES outperforms the SEMO on function PATH when the PAES uses a simple mutation operator. However, it can not find the whole Pareto front with overwhelming probability on the well-studied function LOTZ. Additional experiments show that the experimental results are in agreement with the theoretical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Ayyoub M, Alzu’bi S, Jararweh Y, Shehab MA, Gupta BB (2016) Accelerating 3d medical volume segmentation using GPUs. Multimed Tools App 2016:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brockhoff D, Bader J, Thiele L, Zitzler E (2013) Directed multiobjective optimization based on the hypervolume indicator. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 20(5-6):291–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corne DW, Jerram NR, Knowles JD, Oates MJ (2001) PESA-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of GECCO, vol 2001, pp 283–290

  4. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarian T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: PESA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2(6):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedrich T, Neumann F, Thyssen C (2013) Multiplicative approximations, optimal hypervolume distributions, and the choice of the reference point. Evol Comput 23(1):131–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giel O (2003) Runtime analysis for a simple multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. Tech-Report Department of Computer Science, University of Dortmund, Germany

  7. Giel O, Wegener I (2003) Evolutionary algorithms and the maximum matching problem. In: Proceedings of 20th STACS, LNCS, vol 2607, pp 415–426

  8. Gupta BB, Agrawal DP, Yamaguchi S (2016) Handbook of research on modern cryptographic solutions for computer and cyber security. IGI global

  9. Gutjahr WJ, Sebastiani G (2008) Runtime analysis of ant colony optimization with best-so-far reinforcement. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 10(3):409–433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanne T (2001) Global multiobjective optimization with evolutionary algorithms: Selection mechanisms and mutation control. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993:197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jararweh Y, Al-Ayyoub M, Fakirah M, Alawneh L, Gupta BB (2017) Improving the performance of the needleman-wunsch algorithm using parallelization and vectorization techniques. Multimed Tools App 2017(3):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knowles JD, Corne DW (2000) M-PAES: a memetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Congres on evolutionary computation (CEC 00), pp 325–332

  13. Knowles JD, Corne DW (1999) The Pareto archived evolution strategy: A new baseline algorithm for Pareto multiobjective optimization. In: Congres on evolutionary computation (CEC 99), vol 1. IEEE Press, Piscatawy, NJ, pp 98–105

  14. Kumar R, Banerjee N (2006) Analysis of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm on the 0 − 1 knapsack problem. Theor Comput Sci 358:104–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Laumanns M, Thiele L, Zitzler E, Deb K (2002) Archiving with guaranteed convergence and diversity in multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of GECCO, vol 2002, pp 439–447

  16. Laumanns M, Thiele L, Zitzler E (2004) Runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms on pseudo-Boolean functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(2):170–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Laumanns M, Thiele L, Zitzler E (2004) Runtime analysis of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms on pseudo-Boolean functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2 (8):170–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Laumanns M, Thiele L, Zitzler E (2004) Runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms on a simplified multiobjective knapsack problem. Nat Comput 3:37–51

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumann F, Wegener I (2007) Randomized local search, evolutionary algorithms, and the minimum spanning tree problem. Theor Comput Sci 378:32–40

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Neumann F, Reichel J, Skutella M (2011) Computing minimum cuts by randomized search heuristics. Algorithmica 59:323–342

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen Q, Sutton A, Neumann F (2015) Population size matters: rigorous runtime results for maximizing the hypervolume indicator. Theor Comput Sci 561:24–36

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Qian C, Yu Y, Zhou ZH (2013) An analysis on recombination in multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Artif Intell 204:99–119

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rhazali Y, Hadi Y, Mouloudi A (2016) A Based-Rule method to transform CIM to PIM into MDA. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC) 6.2:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scharnow J, Tinnefeld K, Wegener I (2002) Fitness landscapes based on sorting and shortest paths problems. In: LNCS, vol 2439, pp 54–63

  25. Sudholt D (2006) On the analysis of the (1 + 1) memetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of GECCO, vol 2006, pp 493–500

  26. Xia X, Zhou Y (2018) On the effectiveness of immune inspired mutation operators in some discrete optimization problems. Inform Sciences 426:87–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Xia X, Zhou Y, Lai X (2015) On the analysis of the (1 + 1) evolutionary algorithm for the maximum leaf spanning tree problem. Int J Comput Math 92(10):2023–2035

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(6):712–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou Y (2009) Runtime analysis of an ant colony optimization algorithm for TSP instance. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(5):1083–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Fifth conference on evolutionary methods for design, optimization and control with applications to industrial problems, pp 95–100

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773410, 61703183), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China (20151BAB217008) and the Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong (2015KQNCX086).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics and Systems Science, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510665, People’s Republic of China

    Xue Peng

  2. College of Mathematics Physics and Information Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoyun Xia & Weizhi Liao

  3. Huashang College, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511300, People’s Republic of China

    Zhanwei Guo

Authors
  1. Xue Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoyun Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weizhi Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhanwei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyun Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, X., Xia, X., Liao, W. et al. Running time analysis of the Pareto archived evolution strategy on pseudo-Boolean functions. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 11203–11217 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5466-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5466-3

Keywords