Skip to main content
Log in

Hyperspectral image classification based on joint spectrum of spatial space and spectral space

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel feature extraction model that incorporates local histogram in spatial space and pixel spectrum in spectral space, with the goal of hyperspectral image classification. We named this joint spectrum as 3D spectrum. Moreover, as a pre-processing step, an iterative procedure, which exploits spectral information in such a way that it considers corrupted bands existing in the data cube, is applied to original hyperspectral image. Further, Affine transform is applied to the bands chosen by the aforementioned procedure. The final feature is extracted by affine transform and 3D spectrum model, and as an input of widely used classifier of Support Vector Machine. As a post-processing step, multiple iterative results are fused in the level of probability. Our experimental results indicate that the proposed methodology leads to state-of-the-art classification results when combined with probabilistic classifiers for several widely used hyperspectral data sets, even when very only limited training samples are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benediktsson JA, Palmason JA, Sveinsson JR (2005) Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43(3):480–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bioucas-Dias JM et al (2012) Hyperspectral Unmixing overview: geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observation Remote Sens 5(2):354–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cahill ND, Czaja W, Messinger DW (2014) Schroedinger Eigenmaps with nondiagonal potentials for spatial-spectral clustering of hyperspectral imagery, in SPIE Defense + Security, vol. 9088, p. 908804: SPIE

  4. Camps-Valls G, Gomez-Chova L, Munoz-Mari J, Vila-Frances J, Calpe-Maravilla J (2006) Composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3(1):93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao X, Han J, Yang S, Tao D, Jiao L (2016) Band selection and evaluation with spatial information. Int J Remote Sens 37(19):4501–4520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1214301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang CI (2006) Hyperspectral Data Exploitation: Theory and Applications. pp 47–74

  7. Chen C, Li W, Su H, Liu K (2014) Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image based on kernel extreme learning machine. Remote Sens 6(6):5795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng G, Zhou P, Han J (2016) Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(12):7405–7415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng G, Han J, Lu X (2017) Remote sensing image scene classification: benchmark and state of the art. Proc IEEE 105(10):1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2675998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalla Mura M, Atli Benediktsson J, Waske B, Bruzzone L (2010) Extended profiles with morphological attribute filters for the analysis of hyperspectral data. Int J Remote Sens 31(22):5975–5991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Demirci S, Erer I, Ersoy O (2015) Weighted Chebyshev distance classification method for hyperspectral imaging, in SPIE Sensing Technology + Applications, vol. {9482}, p. 948218: SPIE

  12. Ding G, Guo Y, Zhou J, Gao Y (2016) Large-scale cross-modality search via collective matrix factorization hashing. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(11):5427–5440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2016.2607421

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Du B, Zhang L (2014) A discriminative metric learning based anomaly detection method. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(11):6844–6857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Du B, Zhang L (2014) Target detection based on a dynamic subspace. Pattern Recogn 47(1):344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fauvel M, Chanussot J, Benediktsson JA, Villa A (2013) Parsimonious Mahalanobis kernel for the classification of high dimensional data. Pattern Recogn 46(3):845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fauvel M, Dechesne C, Zullo A, Ferraty F (2015) Fast forward feature selection of hyperspectral images for classification with Gaussian mixture models. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observation Remote Sens 8(6):2824–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gharaati E, Nasri M (2015) A new band selection method for hyperspectral images based on constrained optimization. pp 1–6

  18. Ghedass F, Farah IR (2015) An improved classification of hyperspectral imaging based on spectral signature and gray level co-occurrence matrix. Available: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1535/paper-19.pdf

  19. Guo Y, Ding G, Liu L, Han J, Shao L (2017) Learning to hash with optimized anchor embedding for scalable retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(3):1344–1354. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2652730

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Han J, Zhang D, Cheng G, Guo L, Ren J (2015) Object detection in optical remote sensing images based on weakly supervised learning and high-level feature learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(6):3325–3337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang X, Li S, Benediktsson JA (2014) Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification with edge-preserving filtering. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(5):2666–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khodadadzadeh M, Li J, Plaza A, Ghassemian H, Bioucas-Dias JM, Li X (2014) Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral data using local and global probabilities for mixed pixel characterization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(10):6298–6314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kianisarkaleh A, Ghassemian H (2016) Nonparametric feature extraction for classification of hyperspectral images with limited training samples. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 119(Supplement C):64–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Landgrebe D (2017) AVIRIS NW Indiana's Indian Pines 1992 data set

  25. Li J, Marpu PR, Plaza A, Bioucas-Dias JM, Benediktsson JA (2013) Generalized composite kernel framework for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51(9):4816–4829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li F, Xu L, Siva P, Wong A, Clausi DA (2015) Hyperspectral image classification with limited labeled training samples using enhanced ensemble learning and conditional random fields. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observation Remote Sens 8(6):2427–2438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Khodadadzadeh M, Plaza A, Jia X, Bioucas-Dias JM (2016) A discontinuity preserving relaxation scheme for spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observation Remote Sens 9(2):625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin Z, Ding G, Han J, Wang J (2017) Cross-view retrieval via probability-based semantics-preserving hashing. IEEE Trans Cybern PP(99):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2608906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu X, Wang Y, Yuan Y (2013) Sparse coding from a Bayesian perspective. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 24(6):929–939. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2245914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu X, Wang Y, Yuan Y (2013) Graph-regularized low-rank representation for Destriping of hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51(7):4009–4018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2226730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu X, Li X, Mou L (2015) Semi-supervised multitask learning for scene recognition. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(9):1967–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu X, Zheng X, Yuan Y (2017) Remote sensing scene classification by unsupervised representation learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(9):5148–5157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prasad S, Cui M, Yan L (2016) Composite Kernel Local Angular Discriminant Analysis for Multi-Sensor Geospatial Image Analysis. CoRR, vol. abs/1607.04939%6, p. %&

  34. Sellami A, Farah IR (2016) High-level hyperspectral image classification based on spectro-spatial dimensionality reduction. Spatial Statistics 16(Supplement C):103–117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Soltani-Farani A, Rabiee HR, Hosseini SA (2015) Spatial-aware dictionary learning for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(1):527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun K, Geng X, Ji L, Lu Y (2014) A new band selection method for hyperspectral image based on data quality. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observation Remote Sens 7(6):2697–2703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xia J, Chanussot J, Du P, He X (2015) Spectral-spatial classification for hyperspectral data using rotation forests with local feature extraction and Markov random fields. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(5):2532–2546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yao X, Han J, Guo L, Bu S, Liu Z (2015) A coarse-to-fine model for airport detection from remote sensing images using target-oriented visual saliency and CRF. Neurocomputing 164(Supplement C):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yao X, Han J, Cheng G, Qian X, Guo L (2016) Semantic annotation of high-resolution satellite images via weakly supervised learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(6):3660–3671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao X, Han J, Zhang D, Nie F (2017) Revisiting co-saliency detection: a novel approach based on two-stage multi-view spectral rotation co-clustering. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(7):3196–3209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Yu H, Gao L, Li J, Li S, Zhang B, Benediktsson J (2016) Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification using subspace-based support vector machines and adaptive Markov random fields. Remote Sens 8(4):355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yuan J, Wang D, Cheriyadat AM (2015) Factorization-based texture segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(11):3488–3497

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhong P, Gong Z, Li S, Schönlieb CB (2017) Learning to diversify deep belief networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(6):3516–3530

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61501456) and “Light of West China” (XAB2016B20).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaorong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Pan, Z., Lu, X. et al. Hyperspectral image classification based on joint spectrum of spatial space and spectral space. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 29759–29777 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5552-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5552-6

Keywords

Navigation