Skip to main content
Log in

Iterative adaptive Despeckling SAR image using anisotropic diffusion filter and Bayesian estimation denoising in wavelet domain

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new iterative algorithm has been presented by aggregating Stationary Wavelet Transform (SWT), Bilateral filtering, Bayesian estimation, and Anisotropic Diffusion (AD) filtering to reduce the speckle noise in SAR images. For this purpose, speckle images were first decomposed using two-dimensional stationary wavelet transform and then a suitable filtering method was used to filter respective coefficients of each sub-band of the speckled images. Generally, in wavelet transform-based noise reduction methods, filtering and thresholding techniques are usually applied to the coefficients of the detail sub-bands and the residual speckle noise is ignored in the approximate sub-band. In this paper, bilateral filtering has been applied to reduce the speckle noise in the approximate sub-band. We used Bayesian estimator to calculate the noise-free signal in the horizontal and vertical sub-bands with respect to that some parts of signal coefficients are eliminated in the traditional thresholding techniques. Moreover, we applied anisotropic diffusion filtering method to preserve the edges and structure of image along the diagonal subband which has more details (the entropy is maximum) than other directions in radar and optic images. Finally, both the proposed algorithm and other speckle noise reduction methods were applied on two synthetic speckled images and an actual SAR image in San Francisco. Their efficiencies were compared according to the Structural SIMilarity(SSIM), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Equivalent Number of Looks (ENL), Speckle Suppression Index (SSI) and Speckle Suppression and Mean Preservation Index (SMPI). The experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm efficiently reduces the speckle noise and preserves the edges and structure of image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aghababaee H, Amini J, Tzeng YC (2013) Improving change detection methods of SAR images using fractals. Sci Iranica 20(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhateja V, Tripathi A, Gupta A, Lay-Ekuakille A (2015) Speckle suppression in SAR images employing modified anisotropic diffusion filtering in wavelet domain for environment monitoring. Measurement 74:246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi T, Argenti F, Lapini A, Alparone L (2013) Amplitude vs intensity Bayesian despeckling in the wavelet domain for SAR images. Digit Signal Process (DSP) 23(5):1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2013.04.011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YT, Li BB (2012) An improved SAR image speckle reduction algorithm of wavelet threshold. In Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering (RSETE), 2012 2nd international conference on IEEE pp 1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/RSETE.2012.6260386

  5. Choi H, Jeong J (2018) Despeckling images using a preprocessing filter and discrete wavelet transform-based noise reduction techniques. IEEE Sensors J 18(8):3131–3139. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2794550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dellepiane SG, Angiati E (2014) Quality assessment of despeckled SAR images. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(2):691–707. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2279501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finn S, Glavin M, Jones E (2011) Echocardiographic speckle reduction comparison. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 58(1):82–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFc.2011.1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao Q, Zhao Y, Lu Y (2008) Despeckling SAR images using stationary wavelet transform combining with directional filter banks. Appl Math Comput 205(2):517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2008.05.026

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedaoo P, Godbole SS (2011) Wavelet thresholding approach for image denoising. Int J Netw Secur Appl (IJNSA) 3(4):16–21. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2011.3402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henri M (2008) Processing of synthetic aperture radar images. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang X, Yao H, Zhao S (2017) Text image deblurring via two-tone prior. Neurocomputing 242:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jun Z, Xueguang C, Jian L (1998) A speckle reduction algorithm by soft-thresholding based on wavelet filters for SAR images. In Signal Processing Proceedings 1998. (ICSP'98). 1998 fourth international conference on, IEEE pp 1469–1472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSP.1998.770898

  13. Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1987) Adaptive restoration of images with speckle. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process (ITAES) 35(3):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopes A, Touzi R, Nezry E (1990) Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28(6):992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.62623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mateo JL, Fernández-Caballero A (2009) Finding out general tendencies in speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images. Expert SystAppl 36(4):7786–7797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nason GP, Silverman BW (1995) The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications. In: Antoniadis A, Oppenheim G (eds) Wavelets and statistics. Springer, New York, pp 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_17.

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliver C, Quegan S (1998) Understanding synthetic aperture radar images. Artech House Inc, Boston, pp 451–461

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paris S, Kornprobst P, Tumblin J, Durand F (2009) Bilateral filtering: theory and applications. FoundTrends Comput Graph Vis 4(1):1–73. https://doi.org/10.1561/0600000020

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell (TPAMI) 12(7):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.56205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poodanchi M, Akbarizadeh G, Sobhanifar E, Ansari-Asl K (2014) SAR image segmentation using morphological thresholding. Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT), 2014 6th Conference on. IEEE pp 33–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IKT.2014.7030329

  21. Sarawale MR, Chougule MS (2013) Image denoising using dual-tree complex DWT and double-density dual-tree complex DWT. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol (IJARCET) 2(6):2148–2154

    Google Scholar 

  22. Şimşek A, Bilge HŞ (2011) Comparison of speckle reduction techniques in ultrasound images. In Signal Processing and Communications Applications (SIU), 2011 IEEE 19th Conference on. IEEE pp 375–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IKT.2014.7030329

  23. Su W, Zhou Y (2010) Wavelet transform threshold noise reduction methods in the oil pipeline leakage monitoring and positioning system. In 2010 International conference on measuring technology and mechatronics automation (ICMTMA). IEEE pp 1091–1094. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11767-010-0407-6

  24. Sveinsson JR, Benediktsson JA (2003) Almost translation invariant wavelet transformations for speckle reduction of SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(10):2404–2408. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.817844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vidal-Pantaleoni A, Marti D, Ferrando M (1999) An adaptive multiresolution method for speckle noise reduction in synthetic aperture radar images. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1999(IGARSS'99) Proceedings. IEEE 1999 international 2: pp 1325–1327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1999.774619

  26. Wang Z, Bovik AC (2002) A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process Lett 9(3):81–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/97.995823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang D, Wang B, Zhao S, Sun X, Yao H, Liu H (2015) Dual-mode video stabilization based on adaptive motion clustering. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service (ICIMCS) (p 6). ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2808492.2808498

  28. Wong A, Mishra A, Bizheva K, Clausi DA (2010) General Bayesian estimation for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography retinal imagery. Opt Express 18(8):8338–8352. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.008338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie H, Pierce LE, Ulaby FT (2002) SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40(10):2196–2212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.802473

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rouzbeh Shad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saravani, S., Shad, R. & Ghaemi, M. Iterative adaptive Despeckling SAR image using anisotropic diffusion filter and Bayesian estimation denoising in wavelet domain. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 31469–31486 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6153-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6153-8

Keywords

Navigation