Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An effectual classification approach to detect copy-move forgery using support vector machines

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing need of digital software and media deals with the tampering of numerous multimedia data for mischievous determinations in case of broadcasting approaches. The supreme collective procedure of tampering linked with digital descriptions is copy–move forgery system that deals with a portion of duplicate image and replaced in diverse locations. Therefore, forensic authorities require consistent and effective means of sensing such maliciously forged data. Following study recommends a learning method for the detection of forgery. The image segmentation is the first step, in which the histogram of angled slopes is functional to every block followed by feature extraction; and concentrated to enable the dimension of resemblance. The detection is done using Support vector machines. The results establish that the projected process is intelligent to perceive various instances of copy–move forgery which are able to detect the duplicate regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Qershi OM, Khoo BE (2013) Passive detection of copy–move forgery in digital images: states-of-the-art. Forensic Sci Int 206(1):284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amerini I, Ballan L, Caldelli R, Del Bimbo A, Serra G (2011) A SIFT-based forensic method for copy–move attack detection and transformation recovery. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 6:1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayram S, Husrev HT, Memon N (2009) An efficient and robust method for detecting copy–move forgery. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 1053–1056

  4. Chen L, Lu W, Ni J, Sun W, Huang J (2013) Region duplication detection based on Harris corner points and step sector statistics. J Vis Commun Image Represent 24:244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. CoMoFoD Database. <http://www.vcl.fer.hr/comofod>

  6. Costanzo A, Amerini I, Caldelli R, Barni M (2014) Forensic analysis of SIFT keypoint removal and injection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 9(9):1450–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. CVPR:20–25

  8. Fridrich J (1999) Methods for tamper detection in digital images. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on multimedia and security, pp 19–23

  9. Fridrich J, Soukal D, Lukas J (2003) Detection of copy–move forgery in digital images. In: proceedings of digital forensic research workshop, pp 19–23

  10. Gloe T, Kirchner M, Winkler A, Behme R (2007) Can we trust digital image forensics? In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on multimedia, pp 78–86

  11. Kang X, Wei S (2008) Identifying tampered regions using singular value decomposition in digital image forensics. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer science and software engineering, pp 926–930

  12. Khan S, Kulkarni A (2010) An efficient method for detection of copy–move forgery using discrete wavelet transform. Int J Comput Sci Eng 2:1801–1806

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li L, Li S, Zhu H (2013) An efficient scheme for detecting copy–move forged images by local binary patterns. JIHMSP 4:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li L, Li S, Zhu H, Wu X (2014) Detecting copy–move forgery under affine transforms for image forensics. Comput Electr Eng 40:1951–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe D (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. ICCV 2:1150–1157

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luo W, Huang J, Qiu G (2006) Robust detection of region duplication forgery in digital image. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on pattern recognition, vol 4. pp 746–749

  17. Luo W, Qu Z, Pan F, Huang J (2009) A survey of passive technology for digital image forensics. FCSC 1:308–322

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lynch G, Shih FY, Liao HM (2013) An efficient expanding block algorithm for image copy–move forgery detection. Inf Sci 239:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahdian B, Saic S (2007) Detection of copy–move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. Forensic Sci Int 171:180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan X, Lyu S (2010) Region duplication detection using image feature matching. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 4:857–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Popescu A, Farid H (2004) Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions. Technical Report TR2004–515, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amity school of engineering & Technology, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior, India

    Amrita Parashar & Arvind Kumar Upadhyay

  2. Rustamji Institute of Technology (RJIT), Tekanpur, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Kamlesh Gupta

Authors
  1. Amrita Parashar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arvind Kumar Upadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kamlesh Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrita Parashar.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parashar, A., Upadhyay, A.K. & Gupta, K. An effectual classification approach to detect copy-move forgery using support vector machines. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 29413–29429 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6707-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6707-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation