Skip to main content
Log in

A novel approach on Particle Agent Swarm Optimization (PASO) in semantic mining for web page recommender system of multimedia data: a health care perspective

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent decades have seen huge amounts of information collected in clinical databases for mining patients’ health states from multimedia data. Since on the web diverse type of web recommendation is made obtainable toward user every day with the purpose of consists of Image, Video, Audio, query suggestion and web page. Therefore, multimedia data accessible designed for patient-oriented decision making has improved significantly however is often scattered across various sites. In this perspective, Web page recommender systems with multimedia data might provide patients with further laymen-friendly information helping toward enhanced understand their health status as represented by their record. In this research work, Web Page health recommender systems are introduced via the use of certain agents in order to provide extremely appropriate web pages for patients. The main feature of Particle Agent Swarm Optimization (PASO) is that the creation of the algorithm is denoted by a set of Particle agents who cooperate in attaining the objective of the task under consideration. In the research method, two kinds of agents are presented: web user particle agent and semantic particle agent. PASO Based Web Page Recommendation (PASO-WPR) system is an intermediate program (or a particle agent) containing a user interface, which wisely produces a collection of info that suits an individual’s requirements. PASO-WPR is carried out dependent upon incorporating semantic info with data mining techniques on the web usage data as well as clustering of pages dependent upon similarity in their semantics. As the Web pages with multimedia files are viewed as ontology individuals, the pattern of patients’ navigation are like instances of ontology rather than the uniform resource locators, and with the help of semantic similarity, page clustering is carried out. For producing web page recommendations to users, the outcome is utilized. The recommender engine concentrates on the semantic info and as well exploits a particle agent to reform the outcomes of web pages recommendation. Consequently, the system response time is enhanced and as a result, creating the framework scalable. The outcomes recommend that the PASO-WPR system is improved in identifying the web page that a user is about to request while matched up other approaches. The outcome proves that the presented PASO-WPR system is carried out well in regard to the accuracy measures aspects such as accuracy, coverage and M-Metric are identified to contain greater values compared to the previous item based collaborative filtering recommendation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrishami S, Naghibzadeh M, Jalali M (2012) Web page recommendation based on semantic web usage mining. In: International conference on social informatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–405

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bari P, Chawan PM (2013) Web usage mining. Journal of Engineering, Computers & Applied Sciences (JEAS) 2(6):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batmaz Z, Yurekli A, Bilge A et al (2018) Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9654-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berendt B, Hotho A, Mladenic D, Van Someren M, Spiliopoulou M, Stumme G (2004) A roadmap for web mining: from web to semantic web. In: Web mining: from web to semantic web. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Clerc M (2010) Particle swarm optimization (Vol. 93). Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooley R, Mobasher B, Srivastava J (1999) Data preparation for mining world wide web browsing patterns. Knowl Inf Syst 1(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Du KL, Swamy MNS (2016) Particle swarm optimization. In: Search and optimization by metaheuristics. Birkhäuser, Cham, pp 153–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Etminani K, Delui AR, Naghibzadeh M (2010) Overlapped ontology partitioning based on semantic similarity measures. In: 2010 5th international symposium on telecommunications (IST), pp 1013–1018

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Frikha M, Mhiri M, Gargouri F (2015) A semantic social recommender system using ontologies based approach for Tunisian tourism. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal (ADCAIJ) 4(1):90–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Göksedef M, Gündüz-Öğüdücü Ş (2010) Combination of web page recommender systems. Expert Syst Appl 37(4):2911–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Göksedef M, Öğüdücü ŞG (2007) A consensus recommender for web users. In: International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Grimm S, Abecker A, Völker J, Studer R (2011) Ontologies and the semantic web. In: Domingue J, Fensel D, Hendler JA (eds) Handbook of semantic web technologies. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gulzar Z, Leema AA, Deepak G (2018) PCRS: personalized course recommender system based on hybrid approach. Procedia Comput Sci 125:518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Havens TC, Bezdek JC, Leckie C, Hall LO, Palaniswami M (2012) Fuzzy c-means algorithms for very large data. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(6):1130–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin X, Mobasher B, Zhou Y (2005) A web recommendation system based on maximum entropy. ITCC ‘05: Proceedings of the international conference on information technology: Coding and computing (ITCC’05), Washington, DC, USA (Vol. I, pp. 213–218). IEEE Computer Society

  16. Johnson F, Gupta SK (2012) Web content mining techniques: a survey. Int J Comput Appl 47(11):44–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kennedy J (2011) Particle swarm optimization. In: Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer, Boston, pp 760–766

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar V, Rao VN (2012) ‘Of depth-first search’. Parallel Algorithms for Machine Intelligence and Vision, Springer Science & Business Media, p 1–433

  19. Li J, Zaiane OR (2004) Combining usage, content, and structure data to improve web site recommendation. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on electronic commerce and web, p 305–315

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu B (2007) Web usage mining. Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data, Springer Science & Business Media, p 449–483

  21. Mohr G, Stack M, Rnitovic I, Avery D, Kimpton M (2004) Introduction to heritrix. In: 4th International WebArchiving Workshop, p 109–115

  22. Nguyen TTS, Lu HY, Lu J (2014) Web-page recommendation based on web usage and domain knowledge. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(10):2574–2587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell 1(1):33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rani M, Nayak R, Vyas OP (2015) An ontology-based adaptive personalized e-learning system, assisted by software agents on cloud storage. Knowl-Based Syst 90:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rettinger A, Lösch U, Tresp V, d’Amato C, Fanizzi N (2012) Mining the semantic web. Data Min Knowl Disc 24(3):613–662

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Román PE, L’Huillier G, Velásquez JD (2010) Web usage mining. In: Advanced techniques in web intelligence-I. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Samizadeh R, Ghelichkhani B (2010) Use of semantic similarity and web usage mining to alleviate the drawbacks of user-based collaborative filtering recommender systems use. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research (IJIE) 21(3):137–146

  28. Schlicht A, Stuckenschmidt H (2007) Criteria-based partitioning of large ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Knowledge Capture. ACM, p 171–172

  29. Senkul P, Salin S (2012) Improving pattern quality in web usage mining by using semantic information. Knowl Inf Syst 30(3):527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stumme G, Hotho A, Berendt B (2006) Semantic web mining: state of the art and future directions. Web Semant Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web 4(2):124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thangaraj M, Mchamundeeswari (2014) Agent based personalized semantic web information retrieval system. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 5(8):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wanaskar U, Vij S, Mukhopadhyay D (2013) A hybrid web recommendation system based on the improved association rule mining algorithm. p 1–9. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.7204

  33. Xu G, Zhang Y, Li L (2011) Web content mining. In: Web mining and social networking. Springer, Boston, pp 71–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang S, Wang RS, Zhang XS (2007) Identification of overlapping community structure in complex networks using fuzzy c-means clustering. PHYSICA A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 374(1):483–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang L, Tang Y, Hua C, Guan X (2015) A new particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive inertia weight based on Bayesian techniques. Appl Soft Comput 28:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Manikandan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manikandan, R., Saravanan, V. A novel approach on Particle Agent Swarm Optimization (PASO) in semantic mining for web page recommender system of multimedia data: a health care perspective. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 3807–3829 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7141-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7141-8

Keywords

Navigation