Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the evaluation of multimedia advertising performance

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of multimedia information technology, all walks of life use multimedia technology to publish business information and advertising information to enhance users’ awareness and satisfaction with the industry. Among the applications of using multimedia to enhance management, keyword advertising is undoubtedly one of the successful models. Keyword advertising, a typical kind of multimedia advertising, is an important way for advertiser to match customer needs precisely. Evaluating the effectiveness of this novel advertising approach comes to be the focus of attentions in this field. In addition, user experiences in advertisers’ page are hardly taken into account in existing researches. Using a unique dataset of keywords on a commercial search engine provider in China, we model click, cost per click and conversion simultaneously. We introduce factors of three categories: bidding factor, keyword semantics factors and user cognition factors. Page view and bounce rate, which have not been reported in existing researches as far as we know, are employed to discover user cognition on website. We find that cost per click has a significant relationship with clicks and conversions. Brand information can increase both clicks and conversions while decrease cost per click. Although long tail keyword advertisement may bring website more traffic, it does not increase conversions. Specifically, we find that page view is positive relate to clicks and conversions while bounce rate is negative to conversions. Our research results can be easily applied in practice by advertiser to improve multimedia advertising performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Smith MD (2011) Location, location, location: An analysis of profitability of position in online advertisement markets. J Mark Res 48(6):1057–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal A, Mukhopadhyay T (2016) The Impact of Competing Ads on Click Performance in Sponsored Search. Inf Syst Res 27(3):538–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucklin RE, Sismeiro C (2009) Click here for Internet insight: Advances in clickstream data analysis in marketing. J Interact Mark 23(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dandan Q, Jin Z, Qiang W et al (2017) Finding competitive keywords from query logs to enhance search engine advertising. Inf Manag 54(4):531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized 2nd-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Am Econ Rev 97(1):242–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Manag Sci 55(10):1605–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta G, Saha B, Sarkar UK (2017) Emergent Heterogeneity in keyword valuation in sponsored search markets: a closer-to-practice perspective. Comput Econ 50(4):687–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haans H, Raassens N, Hout RV (2013) Search engine advertisements: The impact of advertising statements on click-through and conversion rates. Mark Lett 24(2):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen BJ, Liu Z, Simon Z (2013) The effect of ad rank on the performance of keyword advertising campaigns. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 64(10):2115–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim S, Qin T, Liu TY et al (2014) Advertiser-centric approach to understand user click behavior in sponsored search. Inf Sci 276(c):242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutz OJ, Trusov M (2011a) Zooming in on paid search ads—a consumer-level model calibrated on aggregated data. Mark Sci 30(5):789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE, Sonnier GP (2012) A latent instrumental variables approach to modeling keyword conversion in paid search advertising. J Mark Res 49(3):306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rutz OJ, Trusov M (2011b) Zooming in on paid search ads—a consumer-level model calibrated on aggregated data. Mark Sci 30(5):789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang S, Ghose A (2010) Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: positive, negative, or zero interdependence. Mark Sci 29(4):602–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 71462002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaoyong Qin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, C., Li, C. & Wei, J. Study on the evaluation of multimedia advertising performance. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 9921–9934 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07780-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07780-1

Keywords

Navigation