Skip to main content
Log in

The design of a dual channel synchronous control system based on a new percutaneous puncture surgical robot

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One type of automatic medical tele-robotics system that is used in Percutaneous Puncture Surgery has been presented in this paper. A compensation (or synchronous) method for physiological movement is a necessary control method to reduce the difficulty of operations and improve operating accuracy for an automatic Percutaneous Puncture Surgical Robot (PPSR). Firstly, the robotics system can put a surgeon away from X-ray radiation. Secondly and importantly, the control system of the Robot is based on an Iterative Learning Control (ILC) algorithm which is a dual channel synchronous control system. The puncture actuator controlling channel is in charge of automatically inserting a needle and compensating for the motion of the internal organs. The robotic arm controlling channel is in charge of controlling the direction of the needle and compensating for the body’s external inserting point motion with the on-line supervision. The performance of the control system has been evaluated and simulated in MATLAB. The results have been proven that the control process is effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandre B, Zhou J, Yang G et al (2009) Motion compensated tomography reconstruction of coronary arteries in rotational angiography[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(4):1254–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruno D, Calinon S, Caldwell DG (2017) Learning autonomous behaviours for the body of a flexible surgical robot[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  3. Cagneau B, Zemiti N, Bellot D, et al. (2007) Physiological motion compensation in robotized surgery using force feedback control[C]// IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 1881–1886

  4. Dominici M, Rui C. (2014) Cascade robot force control architecture for autonomous beating heart motion compensation with model predictive control and active observer[C]// biomedical robotics and biomechatronics. IEEE, 745–751

  5. Ginhoux R, Gangloff J, Mathelin MD et al (2005) Active filtering of physiological motion in robotized surgery using predictive control[J]. IEEE Trans Robot 21(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang SY (2003) Synchronized moving aperture radiation therapy (SMART): average tumour trajectory for lung patients. Phys Med Biol 48(5):587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inoue T, Matsuno T, Yanou A, et al. (2014) Development of a minimally invasive robotic interventional radiology for treatment of lung cancer -manufacture of a basic mechanism and verification experiment-[C]// Sice conference. IEEE, 2646–2651

  8. Kobayashi Y, Moreira P, Liu C et al (2011) Haptic feedback control in medical robots through fractional viscoelastic tissue model[J]. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011(4):6704–6708

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ligorio G, Sabatini AMA (2015) Novel Kalman filter for human motion tracking with an inertial-based dynamic inclinometer[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(8):2033–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy MJ (2004) Tracking moving organs in real time.[J]. Semin Radiat Oncol 14(1):91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura Y, Kishi K, Kawakami H. (2001) Heartbeat synchronization for robotic cardiac surgery[C]// proc. Of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. 2014–2019 vol.2

  12. Prakosa A, Sermesant M, Allain P et al (2014) Cardiac electrophysiological activation pattern estimation from images using a patient-specific database of synthetic image sequences[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(2):235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qu J, Li J, Zhang L, et al. (2013) Design of a novel force-reflecting haptic device for minimally invasive surgery robot[C]// ICME international conference on complex medical engineering. IEEE, 357–362

  14. Richa R, Bó APL, Poignet P (2010) Beating heart motion prediction for robust visual tracking[C]// IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 4579–4584

  15. Sharifi M, Salarieh H, Behzadipour S, Tavakoli M (2017) Tele-echography of moving organs using an Impedance-controlled telerobotic system [J] mechatronics, 05

  16. Strååt SJ (2012) Verification of high energy photon therapy based on PET/CT imaging of photonuclear reactions[J]. Department of Physics

  17. Vidal FP, Villard PF (2016) Development and validation of real-time simulation of X-ray imaging with respiratory motion[J]. Computerized Medical Imaging & Graphics the Official Journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society 49:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood NA, Agua DMD, Zenati MA, et al. (2011) Position estimation of an epicardial crawling robot on the beating heart by modeling of physiological motion[C]// Ieee/rsj international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, 4522–4527.

  19. Zarrouk Z, Chemori A, Poignet P (2013) Force feedback control for compensation of physiological motions in beating heart surgery with real-time experiments[J]:956–961

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liandong Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Hu, T. The design of a dual channel synchronous control system based on a new percutaneous puncture surgical robot. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 10405–10425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07891-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07891-9

Keywords

Navigation