Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

De-noising of images from salt and pepper noise using hybrid filter, fuzzy logic noise detector and genetic optimization algorithm (HFGOA)

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of image de-noising is to remove the noise present in the noisy image. Like that, main objective of proposed methodology is to restore the impulse noised standard test image based on hybrid filter, fuzzy logic system and genetic algorithm. The proposed HFGOA method consists of three steps. In the first step noisy image is de-noised using mean filter and median filter, individually. In the second step the difference vector is calculated using two filters output then it is given as input to fuzzy logic system. Fuzzy rules were generated from the difference vector value using triangular membership function. In the third step using genetic optimization algorithm optimal rule will be selected. Fitness value (PSNR) calculated for each population. The new population was repeatedly created using genetic operator until getting best fitness value. The performance of the proposed method was measured using PSNR value. HFGOA method is tested over standard test image (lena image) for different percentage of salt and pepper noise. The Experimental results of HFGOA method is compared with results of different exiting filters. An experimental result shows the HFGOA method rectifies the drawbacks of exiting filters and increases the visual quality of the image by increasing the PSNR value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed F, Das S (2014) Removal of high-density salt-and-pepper noise in images with an iterative adaptive fuzzy filter using alpha-trimmed mean. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(5):1352–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubert G, Kornprobst P (2006) Mathematical problems in image processing—partial differential equations and the calculus of variations, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin L, McGlamery (1967) Restoration of turbulence-degraded images. J Opt Soc Am 57(3):293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan RH, Ho CW, Nikolova M (2005) Salt and pepper noise removal by median type noise detectors and detail-preserving regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(10):1479–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deivalakshmi S, Palanisamy P (2016) Removal of high density salt and pepper noise through improved tolerance based selective arithmetic mean filtering with wavelet thresholding. AEU - Int J Electron Commun 70(6):757–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fullér R, Hassanein H, Ali AN (1996) Neural fuzzy systems: towards IMT-advanced networks. Åbo: Åboakademi xxvii:275 ISBN 95–165–0624-0

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2011) Digital image processing. Third Impression, Pearson Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  8. Habib M, Hussain A, Rasheed S, Ali M (2016) Adaptive fuzzy inference system based directional median filter for impulse noise removal. AEU - Int J Electron Commun 70(5):689–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. James L, Harris (1966) Image evaluation and restoration. J Opt Soc Am 56(5):569–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaehler SD (1998) Fuzzy Logic Tutorial. Seattle Robotics Society [online. Availableat: http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/mar98/fuz/flindex.html

  11. Li Y, Sun J, Luo H (2014) A neuro-fuzzy network based impulse noise filtering for gray scale images. Neuro computing 127:190–199

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin CH, Tsai JS, Chiu CT (2010) Switching bilateral filter with a texture/noise detector for universal noise removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(9):2307–2320

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu L, Chen CLP, Zhou Y, You X (2015) A new weighted mean filter with a two-phase detector for removing impulse noise. Inf Sci 315:1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Nadernejad E, Korhonen J, Forchhammer S, Burini N (2013) Enhancing perceived quality of compressed images and video with anisotropic diffusion and fuzzy filtering. Signal Process Image Commun 28(3):222–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross TJ, HASSANEIN H, ALI AN (2010) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications: design and stability analysis, vol xxvii, 3rd edn. (RoyaumeUni): Wiley, Chichester, p 275 ISBN 978–047–0748-510

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Russo F, Ramponi G (1996) A fuzzy filter for images corrupted by impulse noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 3(6):168–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulte S, Nachtegael M, De Witte V, Van der Weken D, Kerre EE (2006) A fuzzy impulse noise detection and reduction method. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(5):1153–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Senthilselvi A, Sukumar R (2014) A survey on image restoration technique. Int J Emerg Eng Res Technol 2(8):123–128

    Google Scholar 

  19. Senthilselvi A, Sukumar R (2018) Removal of salt and pepper noise from images using hybrid filter (HF) and fuzzy logic noise detector (FLND). J Concurr Comput: Pract Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4501

  20. Toh KKV, Isa NAM (2010a) Noise adaptive fuzzy switching median filter for salt and pepper noise reduction. IEEE Signal Process Lett 17(3):281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Toh KKV, Isa NAM (2010b) Cluster-based adaptive fuzzy switching median filter for universal impulse noise reduction. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 56(4):2560–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang L-X, Hassanein H, Ali AN (1994) Adaptive fuzzy systems and control: design and stability analysis, vol xxvii. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, p 275 ISBN978–013–1471-092

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang S, Karim MA (2002) A new impulse detector for switching median filters. IEEE Signal Process Lett 9(11):360–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L (2017) Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(7):3142–3155

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou Z (2012) Cognition and removal of impulse noise with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(7):3157–3167

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zuo ZY, Zhang TX, Hu J, Zhou G (2013) A new method for removing impulse noisebased on noise space characteristic. Optik 18(124):3503–3509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramesh S, Ganesh Kumar P (2013) A comparative analysis of routing techniques in intermittently connected MANETs. Asian Journal of Scientific Research 6(4):736–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramesh S, Ganesh Kumar P (2014) A secure 3-way routing protocols for intermittently connected mobile Ad Hoc networks. Sci World J 2014:1–13

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of CSE, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India

    A. Senthil Selvi & K. Pradeep Mohan Kumar

  2. Department of CSE, Kalasalingam University, Tamil Nadu, India

    S. Dhanasekeran

  3. Department of MCA, Anna University Regional Campus Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

    P. Uma Maheswari

  4. Department of Information Technology, Velagapudi Ramakrishna Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

    S. Ramesh

  5. Department of Information Technology, Sethu Institute of Technology, Tamil Nadu, India

    S. Senthil Pandi

Authors
  1. A. Senthil Selvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Pradeep Mohan Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Dhanasekeran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Uma Maheswari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Ramesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Senthil Pandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ramesh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Senthil Selvi, A., Kumar, K.P.M., Dhanasekeran, S. et al. De-noising of images from salt and pepper noise using hybrid filter, fuzzy logic noise detector and genetic optimization algorithm (HFGOA). Multimed Tools Appl 79, 4115–4131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7727-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7727-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation