Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Quality perception of specific chromatic impairments

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work was motivated by previous studies on the perceptual influence of chromatic impairments, where was observed that specific chromatic impairments might have a different influence, related to the represented content. Hence, in this study, chromatic impairments were applied to specific color clusters and the resulting perceptual influence was analyzed. The applied chromatic impairments influence on the images naturalness was assessed using a Single Stimulus Continuous Quality Evaluation (SSCQE) and the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) was calculated. Furthermore, during the image assessment, the eye movements were registered using an eye tracking device and the Relative Fixation Time (RFT) was computed. It was concluded that the induced chromatic impairments, lead to lower MOS values than the original images, revealing a perception of quality loss. Furthermore, when nature colors are changed, subjects revealed a larger perception of the impairment, resulting in smaller MOS and producing evident changes in the RFT’s. The comparative analysis between the MOS and the RFT’s reveals high Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) results (p = 0.79 ± 0.14).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldaba M, Linhares J, Pinto P, Nascimento S, Amano K, Foster D (2006) Visual sensitivity to color errors in images of natural scenes. Vis Neurosci 23 (3-4):555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alers H, Bos L, Heynderickx I (2011) How the task of evaluating image quality influences viewing behavior. In: 2011 Third international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), pp 167–172

  3. Babcock JS, Pelz JB, Fairchild MD (2003) Eye tracking observers during color image evaluation tasks. In: Proceedings on human vision and electronic imaging VIII (SPIE), vol 5007, pp 218–230

  4. Bernardo MV, Pinheiro AMG, Pereira M, Fiadeiro PT (2012) A study on the user perception to color variations. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimedia, Nara, pp 1009–1012

  5. Bernardo MV, Pinheiro AMG, Fiadeiro PT, Pereira M (2013) Specific chromatic errors: a quality assessment. In: 2013 Fifth international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), pp 1–5

  6. Bernardo MV, Pinheiro AMG, Fiadeiro PT, Pereira M (2015) Eye gaze behavior under chromatic impairments and quality assessment. In: 2015 Seventh international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), pp 1–6

  7. Bernardo MV, Pinheiro AMG, Fiadeiro PT, Pereira M (2016) Image quality under chromatic impairments. ACM Trans Appl Percept 14(1):6:1–6:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brainard D (1989) Calibration of a computer controlled color monitor. Color Res Appl 14(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CIE (1986) Colorimetry official recommendation of the international commission on illumination. CIE publication 15.2 CIE Central Bureau

  10. Engelke U, Maeder A, Zepernick H (2009) Visual attention modelling for subjective image quality databases. In: IEEE International workshop on multimedia signal processing, 2009. MMSP ’09, pp 1–6

  11. Fliegel K (2008) Eyetracking based approach to objective image quality assessment. In: 2008 42nd Annual IEEE international carnahan conference on security technology, pp 371–376

  12. Forsyth D, Ponce J (2011) Computer vision: a modern approach. Prentice Hall PTR

  13. Foster D, Nascimento S, Amano K (2004) Information limits on neural identification of colored surfaces in natural scenes. Vis Neurosci 21(3):331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster DH, Amano K, Nascimento SMC, Foster MJ (2006) Frequency of metamerism in natural scenes. J Opt Soc Am A 23(10):2359–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbons J, Chakraborti S (2003) Nonparametric statistical inference, 4 edn. Revised and expanded. Statistics: a series of textbooks and monographs. Taylor & Francis

  16. Goldberg JH, Stimson MJ, Lewenstein M, Scott N, Wichansky AM (2002) Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In: Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on eye tracking research & applications, ETRA ’02. ACM, New York, pp 51–58

  17. Hunt R (1975) The reproduction of colour, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huynh-Thu Q, Schiatti L (2011) Examination of 3D visual attention in stereoscopic video content. In: Proceedings on human vision and electronic imaging XVI (SPIE), vol 7865, p 15

  19. Ishihara S (1998) Ishihara’s tests for colour blindness: 24 plate edition. Abridged 24 Plate Edition Taylor & Francis

  20. ITU-T Recommendation P.911 (1998) Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia application. Tech. rep., International Telecommunication Union

  21. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-12 (2009) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Tech. rep., International Telecommunication Union

  22. ITU-T Tutorial (2004) Objective perceptual assessment of video quality: full reference television. Tech. rep., International Telecommunication Union

  23. Jacob RJK, Karn KS (2003) Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: ready to deliver the promises. Mind 2(3):4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jansen L, Onat S, König P (2009) Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes. J Vis, 9(1)

  25. Just MA, Carpenter PA (1976) Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cogn Psychol 8(4):441–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krueger R, Applegate R, MacRae S (2004) Wavefront customized visual corrections: the quest for super vision II. SLACK

  27. Kruskal W, Wallis W (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc, 583–621

  28. Laghari KUR, Connelly K (2012) Toward total quality of experience: a qoe model in a communication ecosystem. IEEE Commun Mag 50(4):58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Linhares JM, Pinto PD, Nascimento SM (2008) The number of discernible colors in natural scenes. J Opt Soc Am A 25(12):2918–2924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu H, Heynderickx I (2011) Visual attention in objective image quality assessment: based on eye-tracking data. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Vid Technol 21(7):971–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo M, Cui G, Rigg B (2001) The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 26(5):340–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meur OL, Ninassi A, Callet PL, Barba D (2010) Overt visual attention for free-viewing and quality assessment tasks: impact of the regions of interest on a video quality metric. Signal Process: Image Commun 25(7):547–558. Special Issue on Image and Video Quality Assessment

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mollon J, Reffin J (1989) A computer-controlled colour vision test that combines the principles of chibret and stilling. J Physiol, 414(5P)

  34. Ninassi A, Meur OL, Callet PL, Barba D (2007) Does where you gaze on an image affect your perception of quality? Applying visual attention to image quality metric. In: 2007 IEEE International conference on image processing, vol 2, pp II – 169–II – 172

  35. Poole A, Ball LJ (2005) Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: current status and future. In: Prospects, Chapter in C. Ghaoui (ed) encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Idea Group, Inc, Pennsylvania

  36. Reichl P, Fabini J, Happenhofer M, Egger C (2008) From QoS to QoX: a charging perspective. In: Proc. 18th ITC specialist seminar on quality of experience, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona

  37. Reiter U, Brunnström K, De Moor K, Larabi MC, Pereira M, Pinheiro A, You J, Zgank A (2014) Quality of experience: advanced concepts, applications and methods, chap. Factors influencing quality of experience. Springer International Publishing, pp 55–72

  38. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4):591–611

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Spearman C (1910) Correlation calculated from faulty data. British J Psychol, 1904-1920 3(3):271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vijay Venkatesh M, Cheung S (2010) Eye tracking based perceptual image inpainting quality analysis. In: 2010 17th IEEE International conference on image processing (ICIP), pp 1109–1112

  41. Wismeijer DA, Erkelens CJ, Rv Ee, Wexler M (2010) Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements. J Vis 10(6):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. WMA (2009) World medical association declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects

  43. You J, Reiter U, Hannuksela MM, Gabbouj M, Perkis A (2010) Perceptual-based quality assessment for audio-visual services: a survey. Signal Process Image Commun 25(7):482–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Portuguese FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology and co-fund by FEDER – PT2020 partnership agreement under the project PTDC / EEI-PRO / 2849/2014 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016693}, and under the UIDB / EEA / 50008/2020 project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Telecomunicações (IT), Universidade da Beira Interior, Rua Marquês d’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal

    Marco V. Bernardo, António M. G. Pinheiro & Manuela Pereira

  2. Fiber Materials and Environmental Technologies (FibEnTech), Universidade da Beira Interior, Rua Marquês d’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal

    Paulo T. Fiadeiro

Authors
  1. Marco V. Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. António M. G. Pinheiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paulo T. Fiadeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manuela Pereira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco V. Bernardo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernardo, M.V., Pinheiro, A.M.G., Fiadeiro, P.T. et al. Quality perception of specific chromatic impairments. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 19831–19851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08766-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08766-0

Keywords