Skip to main content
Log in

Hybridized approach of image segmentation in classification of fruit mango using BPNN and discriminant analyzer

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In machine learning, image classification accuracy generally depends on image segmentation and feature extraction methods with the extracted features and its qualities. The main focus of this paper is to determine the defected area of mangoes using image segmentation algorithm for improving the classification accuracy. The Enhanced Fuzzy based K-means clustering algorithm is designed for increasing the efficiency of segmentation. Proposed segmentation method is compared with K-means and Fuzzy C-means clustering methods. The geometric, texture and colour based features are used in the feature extraction. Process of feature selection is done by Maximally Correlated Principal Component Analysis (MCPCA). Finally, in the classification step, severe portions of the affected area are analyzed by Backpropagation Based Discriminant Classifier (BBDC). Proposed classifier is compared with BPNN and Naive Bayes classifiers. The images are classified into three classes in final output like Class A –good quality mango, Class B-average quality mango, and Class C-poor quality mango. Finally, the evaluated results of the proposed model examine various defected and healthy mango images and prove that the proposed method has the highest accuracy when compared with existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal A, Sarkar A, Dubey AK (2019) Computer vision based fruit disease detection and classification, Smart innovations in communication and computational sciences. Proceedings of ICSICCS. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–115

  2. Ahmed AH, Islam T, Ema RR (2019) A New Hybrid Intelligent GAACO Algorithm for Automatic Image Segmentation and Plant Leaf or Fruit Diseases Identification Using TSVM Classifier, International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE), PP. 1–6

  3. Awate A, Deshmanker D, Amrutkar G, Bagul U, Sonavane S (2015) Fruit disease detection using color ,texture analysis and ANN, International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGIOT), pp. 970–975

  4. Azarmdel H, Jahanbakhshi A, Mohtasebi SS, Muñoz AR (2020) Evaluation of image processing technique as an expert system in mulberry fruit grading based on ripeness level using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machine (SVM). Postharv Biol Technol 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111201

  5. Behera SK, Sangita S, Rath AK, Sethy PK (2019) Automatic classification of mango using statistical features and SVM, Advances in computer, communication and control. Springer, Berlin, pp 469–475

  6. Bhange M, Hingoliwala H (2015) Smart farming: pomegranate disease detection using image processing. Procedia Comput Sci 58:280–288

  7. Bhatt AK, Pant D (2013) Automatic apple grading model development based on backpropagation neural network & machine vision, and its performance evaluation. AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, pp 45–56

  8. Bhatt AK, Pant D, Singh R (2014) An analysis of the performance of artificial neural network technique for apple classification. Journal AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, imprint by Springer, pp 103–111

  9. Bielza C, Barreiro P, Rodríguez-Galiano MI, Martín J (2003) Logistic regression for simulating damage occurrence on a fruit grading line. Comput Electron Agric 39(2):95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blasco J, Aleixos N, Moltó E (2003) Machine vision system for automatic quality grading of fruit. Biosyst Eng 85(4):415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhakete M, Ingola A (2015) Diagnosis of pomegranate plant diseases using neural network, fifth national conference on computer vision, pattern recognition, image processing and graphics, pp 1–4

  12. Dorj UO, Lee M, Yun S (2017) An yield estimation in citrus orchards via fruit detection and counting using image processing. Comput Electron Agric 150:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gavhale KR, Gawande U (2014) An overview of the research on plant leaves disease detection using image processing techniques. IOSR J Comput Eng (IOSR-JCE) 16(1):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geng Y, Liang RZ, Li W, Wang J, Liang G, Xu C, Wang JY (2016a) Learning convolutional neural network to maximize pos@ top performance measure, ESANN 2017 - Proceedings, pp. 589–594

  15. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gurubelli Y, Ramanathan M, Ponnusamy P (2019) Fractional fuzzy 2DLDA approach for pomegranate fruit grade classification. Comput Electron Agric 162:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hung C, Underwood J, Nieto J, Sukkarieh S (2015) A feature learning based approach for automated fruit yield estimation, Filed and service robotics, pp. 485–498

  18. Iqbal Z, Khan MA, Sharif M, Shah JH, Rahman MH, Javed K (2018) An automated detection and classification of citrus plant diseases using image processing techniques: A review. Computers and electronics in agriculture, Computers and electronics in agriculture, pp 12–32

  19. Kondo N (2010) Automation on fruit and vegetable grading system and food traceability. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(3):145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumari N, Bhatt AK, Dwivedi RK, Belwal R (2018) Physical parameter extraction of fruit mango using image processing in MATLAB. IJERA

  21. Kumari N, Bhatt AK, Dwivedi RK, Belwal R (2019) Performance analysis of support vecor machine in defective and non defective mangoes classification. IJEAT: 1563–1572

  22. Lee D-J, Archibald JK, Xiong G (2011) Rapid Color Grading for Fruit Quality Evaluation Using Direct Color Mapping. IEEE Transact Auto Sci Eng 8(2):292–302

  23. Liang N, Ni F, Zhang K, Tang Y, Hu Y (2018) Optimized installation angle and distance of a grading channel for dried jujube fruit with a push-pull actuating mechanism. Comput Electron Agric 150:134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matteoli S, Diani M, Massai R, Corsini G, Remorini D (2015) A Spectroscopy-Based Approach for Automated Nondestructive Maturity Grading of Peach Fruits. IEEE Sens J 15(10)

  25. Momin MA, Rahman MT, Sultana MS, Igathinathane C, Grift TE (2017) Geometry-based mass grading of mango fruits using image processing. Info Process Agric 4(2):150–160

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nambi VE, Thangavel K, Jesudas DM (2015) Scientific classification of ripening period and development of colour grade chart for Indian mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) using multivariate cluster analysis. Sci Hortic 193:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nandi CS, Tudu B, Koley C (2016) A Machine Vision Technique for Grading of Harvested Mangoes Based on Maturity and Quality. IEEE Sens J 16(16)

  28. Ohali YA (2011) Computer vision based date fruit grading system: design and implementation. J King Saud Univ - Comp Info Sci 23(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pujari JD, Yakkundimath R, Byadgi AS (2015) Image processing based detection of fungal diseases in plants. Procedia Comput Sci 46:1802–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qiao J, Sasao A, Shibusawa S, Kondo N, Morimoto E (2005) Mapping yield and quality using the mobile fruit grading robot. Biosyst Eng 90(2):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ronald M, Evans M (2016) Classification of selected apple fruitvarieties using naive Bayes, Indian J Comp Sci Eng pp 13–19

  32. Sa’ad FSA, Ibrahim MF, Shakaff AYM, Zakaria A, Abdullah MZ (2015) Shape and weight grading of mangoes using visible imaging. Comput Electron Agric 115:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sajjad M, Ullah A, Ahmad J, Abbas N, Rho S, Baik SW (2018) Integrating salient colors with rotational invariant texture features for image representation in retrieval systems. Multimed Tools Appl 77:4769–4789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sajjad M, Zahir S, Ullah A, Akhtar Z, Muhammad K (2019) Human behavior understanding in big multimedia data using CNN based facial expression recognition. Mobile Netw Appl 25:1611–1621

  35. Vishnu S, Ranjith RA (2015) Plant disease detection using leaf pattern: A review. IJISET 2(6):774–780

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yan Z, Zheng L-J, Nie J-Y, Li Z-X, Cheng Y (2018) Evaluation indices of sour flavor for apple fruit and grading standards. J Integr Agric 17(5):994–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang G, Liang G, Li W, Fang J, Wang J, Geng Y, Wang JY (2017) Learning convolution ranking-score function by query preference regularization. In International conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning (pp. 1-8). Springer, Cham

  38. Zhang G, Liang G, Su F, Qu F, Wang JY (2018) Cross-domain attributes representation based on convolutional neural network. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing (pp. 134-142). Springer, Cham

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeraj Kumari.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, N., Kr. Bhatt, A., Kr. Dwivedi, R. et al. Hybridized approach of image segmentation in classification of fruit mango using BPNN and discriminant analyzer. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 4943–4973 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09747-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09747-z

Keywords