Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

EBGO: an optimal load balancing algorithm, a solution for existing tribulation to balance the load efficiently on cloud servers

  • 1174: Futuristic Trends and Innovations in Multimedia Systems Using Big Data, IoT and Cloud Technologies (FTIMS)
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A burning challenge is balancing the demand for servers in computer data centers. In the modern era, the bulk of computer systems are used for big data and cloud computing. The Internet of Things (IoT) is becoming a hyper-world of physical, cyber and social worlds with big data as a connection. In the latest systems architectures, managing the load in cloud applications is a major challenge. While several techniques and algorithms have been framed to achieve optimality in the load balancing definition, they are limited to the current problems of that time. However, due to a massive increase in data to be handled for the computing activities that are running on servers, exponential petabytes of data that are stored, the complexity of the problem increases day by day. By efficiently balancing the load and high utilization of the available resources from the computing pool, the solution to such problems can be achieved. When these are performed professionally, optimum values can be accomplished with the prominent use of available resources. Genetic Algorithms, Bacteria Foraging, optimizes the algorithm, Artificial Bee Colony, Optimized ABC are current trending algorithms used in load balancing concepts. All these trending algorithms, while strong, lack certain factors. To overcome them, we proposed an EBGO algorithm that has overcome the disadvantages of the trending load balancing algorithms in terms of certain significant parameters such as response time, energy consumption, weighted total cost, procession time, and many. This model aims to achieve overall optimal parameter values, thus efficiently balancing the demand on servers in data centers, resulting in optimal resource use. This model is often appropriate for health care systems, where large number of different types of systems and data are shared between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed A, Latif R, Latif S (2018) Malicious insiders attack in IoT based Multi-Cloud e-Healthcare environment: A Systematic Literature Review. Multimed Tools Appl 77:21947–21965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldribi A, Traore I, Moa B (2018) Data sources and datasets for cloud intrusion detection modeling and evaluation. In: Mishra B, Das H, Dehuri S, Jagadev A (eds) Cloud computing for optimization: foundations, applications, and challenges. Studies in big data, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73676-1_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Amiri M, Mohammad-khanli L (2017) Survey on prediction models of applications for resources provisioning in cloud. J NetwComput Appl 82:93–113

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aslam S, Shah MA (2015) Load balancing algorithms in cloud computing: A survey of modern techniques. 2015 National Software Engineering Conference (NSEC), Rawalpindi, pp 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSEC.2015.7396341

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Babou CSM Hierarchical Load Balancing and Clustering Technique for Home Edge Computing. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007944

  6. Barik RK (2018) Fog assisted cloud computing in era of big data and internet-of-things: systems, architectures, and applications. In: Mishra B, Das H, Dehuri S, Jagadev A (eds) Cloud computing for optimization: foundations, applications, and challenges. Studies in big data, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73676-1_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Barik H, Swain NK, Adhikari N (2020) Load Balanced Double Star: A High-Performance Architecture for Data Intensive Applications, vol 2020. International conference on computer science, engineering and applications (ICCSEA), Gunupur, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSEA49143.2020.9132838

  8. Chaudhury KS, Pattnaik S, Moharana HS, Pradhan S (2020) Static load balancing algorithms in cloud computing: challenges and solutions. In: Reddy V, Prasad V, Wang J, Reddy K (eds) Soft computing and signal processing. ICSCSP 2019.Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 1118. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dam S, Mandal G, Dasgupta K, Dutta P (2014) An ant Colony based load balancing strategy in cloud computing. In: Kumar Kundu M, Mohapatra D, Konar A, Chakraborty A (eds) Advanced computing, networking and informatics- volume 2. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07350-7_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Das S, Dasgupta S, Biswas A, Abraham A, Konar A (2009) On stability of the chemotactic dynamics in bacterial-foraging optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet- Part A: Syst Humans 39(3):670–679. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2008.2011474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Du KL, Swamy MNS (2019) Big data, cloud computing, and internet of things. In: Neural Networks and Statistical Learning. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7452-3_31

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ebadifard F, Babamir SM, Barani S (2020) A dynamic task scheduling algorithm improved by load balancing in cloud computing. 2020 6th international conference on web research (ICWR). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/icwr49608.2020.9122287

  13. Ebadifard F, Babamir SM, Barani S (2020) A Dynamic Task Scheduling Algorithm Improved by Load Balancing in Cloud Computing. 2020 6th international conference on web research (ICWR), Tehran, pp 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWR49608.2020.9122287

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Elrotub M, Gherbi A (2018) Virtual machine classification-BasedApproach to enhanced workload balancing for cloud computing applications. Procedia Comput Sci 130:683–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elrotub M, Gherbi A (2018) Virtual machine classification-BasedApproach to enhanced workload balancing for cloud computing applications. Procedia Comput Sci 130:683–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Essa YM, Hemdan EE, El-Mahalawy A (2019) IFHDS: intelligent framework for securing healthcare BigData. J Med Syst 43:124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1250-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gu X, Liao Z (2017) Short-term load forecasting based on phase space reconstruction and Gaussian process regression[J]. Power Syst Protect Control 45(5):73–79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu J, Wei X, Yang M, Tang B, Lin K, Zhong Y (2020) A Practical RBF Framework for Database Load Balancing Prediction. 2020 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and big data (ICAIBD), Chengdu, pp 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD49809.2020.9137481

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Huankai C, Wang F, Helian N, Akanmu G (2013) User-priority guided Min-Min scheduling algorithm for load balancing in cloud computing. 2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PARCOMPTECH), Bangalore, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ParCompTech.2013.6621389

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapoor S, Dabas C (2015) Cluster based load balancing in cloud computing. 2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), Noida, pp 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2015.7346656

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kong W, Dong ZY, Jia Y (2017) Short-term residential load forecasting based on LSTM recurrent neural network[J]. IEEE Trans Smart Grid:1–1

  22. Lim J, Lee D (2020) A load balancing algorithm for Mobile devices in edge cloud computing environments. Electronics 9(4):686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohiddin S. (2019) Unique methodology to mitigate anti-forensics in cloud using attack-graphs. 8. 1569-1574. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A1037.0881019

  24. Mohiddin SK, Babu DYS (2019) A relevance technical approach for screening the significance of IDS in cloud Forensics.IJITEE) ISSN, pp.2278-3075

  25. Mohiddin SK, Babu YS (2020) Role of cloud forensics in cloud computing. In soft computing for problem solving (pp. 91-107). Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohiddin SK, Yalavarthi SB, Kondragunta V (2019) An analytical comparative approach of cloud forensic tools during cyber attacks in cloud. In soft computing for problem solving (pp. 509-517). Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mulla BP, Krishna CR, Tickoo RK (2020) Load Balancing Algorithm for Efficient VM Allocation in Heterogeneous Cloud (March 24, 2020). International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC) Vol.12, No.1

  28. Muthulakshmi B, Somasundaram K (2017) A hybrid ABC-SA based optimized scheduling and resource allocation for cloud environment. Clust Comput 22:10769–10777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1174-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nace D, Pioro M (2008) Max-min fairness and its applications to routing and load-balancing in communication networks: a tutorial," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 5–17, Fourth Quarter, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2008.080403

  30. Nasr AA, El-Bahnasawy NA, Attiya G, El-Sayed A (2019) Cloudlet scheduling based load balancing on virtual Machines in Cloud Computing Environment. J Internet Technol 20(5):1371–1378

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nayak L, Jayalakshmi V (2020) A Survey on Privacy Preserving Approaches on Health Care Big Data in Cloud. In: Pandian A, Palanisamy R, Ntalianis K (eds) Proceeding of the International Conference on Computer Networks, Big Data and IoT (ICCBI - 2019). ICCBI 2019. Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43192-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Nayyar A, Singh R (2019) IEEMARP- a novel energy efficient multipath routing protocol based on ant Colony optimization (ACO) for dynamic sensor networks. Multimed Tools Appl 79:35221–35252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7627-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng K, Huang H, Pan W, Wang J (2020) Joint optimization for time consumption and energy consumption of multi-application and load balancing of cloudlets in mobile edge computing. IET Cyber-Phys Syst: Theory Appl 5(2):196–206, 6. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2019.0085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Remesh Babu KR, Samuel P (2016) Enhanced bee Colony algorithm for efficient load balancing and scheduling in cloud. In: Snášel V, Abraham A, Krömer P, Pant M, Muda A (eds) Innovations in bio-inspired computing and applications. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 424. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28031-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Remesh Babu KR, Samuel P (2016) Enhanced bee Colony algorithm for efficient load balancing and scheduling in cloud. In: Snášel V, Abraham A, Krömer P, Pant M, Muda A (eds) Innovations in bio-inspired computing and applications. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 424. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28031-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Saif T, Javaid N, Rahman M, Butt H, Kamal MB, Ali MJ (2019) Round Robin Inspired History Based Load Balancing Using Cloud Computing. In: Xhafa F, Leu FY, Ficco M, Yang CT (eds) Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing. 3PGCIC 2018. Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02607-3_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Seema B, Yao N, Carie A (2020) Efficient data transfer in clustered IoT network with cooperative member nodes. Multimed Tools Appl 79:34241–34251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08775-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Semmoud A, Hakem M, Benmammar B, Charr J (2020) Load balancing in cloud computing environments based on adaptive starvation threshold. Concurrency Computation: Pract Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5652

  39. Stanojevic R, Shorten R (2009) Load Balancing vs. Distributed Rate Limiting: An Unifying Framework for Cloud Control, vol 2009. IEEE International conference on communications, Dresden, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5199141

  40. Stavrinides GL, Karatza HD (2020) Dynamic scheduling of bags-of-tasks with sensitive input data and end-to-end deadlines in a hybrid cloud. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08974-8

  41. Uma Maheswari S, Vasanthanayaki C (2020) Secure medical health care content protection system (SMCPS) with watermark detection for multi cloud computing environment. Multimed Tools Appl 79:4075–4097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7724-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang J, Yang W, Pei D, etc (2018) Research and application of a hybrid forecasting framework based on multi-objective optimization for electrical power system[J]. Energy 148:59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu M, Tian W, Buyya R (2017) A survey on load balancing algorithms for virtual machines placement in cloud computing. Concurr ComputPract Exp 29(12):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yao J, He J-h (2012) Load balancing strategy of cloud computing based on artificial bee algorithm. 2012 8th International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management (NCM and ICNIT), Seoul, pp 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zomaya AY, Teh Y-H (2001) Observations on using genetic algorithms for dynamic load-balancing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distributed Syst 12(9):899–911. https://doi.org/10.1109/71.954620

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of CSE, Indian Institute of Technology ( ISM), Dhanbad, India

    Prasad Velpula & Rajendra Pamula

Authors
  1. Prasad Velpula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajendra Pamula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasad Velpula.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velpula, P., Pamula, R. EBGO: an optimal load balancing algorithm, a solution for existing tribulation to balance the load efficiently on cloud servers. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 34653–34675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11012-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11012-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation