Skip to main content
Log in

A feature extraction based support vector machine model for rectal cancer T-stage prediction using MRI images

  • 1162: Machine learning for big multimedia analytics
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate clinical cancer T-stage diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. However, it is difficult, time-consuming, and laborious for physicians to recognize T-stage manually using rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images. Machine learning methods have played important roles in medical image processing. With the goal of automatic rectal cancer T-stage prediction, we train the proposed Feature Extraction based Support Vector Machine (FE-SVM) model with the newly acquired dataset consisting of 147 patients’ MRI images with primary rectal cancer. Our method adapts SVM as the training framework as SVM is effective enough for dealing with small datasets as opposed to state-of-the-art deep learning models. FE-SVM firstly extracts image similarity as an initial feature because the feature of image similarity can better reflect the differences among various types of MRI images, and the final 10-dimensional features are obtained by a 5-layers Autoencoder. To evaluate the performance of FE-SVM, we compared it with six benchmark models: CNN, Alexnet, Resnet18, Resnet50, Capsule Network, and Random Forest. FE-SVM outperforms these state-of-the-art models with significant evaluation scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Khalek S, Ishak AB, Omer OA, Obada A-SF (2017) A two-dimensional image segmentation method based on genetic algorithm and entropy. Optik 131:414–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acharjya DP (2020) A hybrid scheme for heart disease diagnosis using rough set and cuckoo search technique. J Med Syst 44:27–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, McKie PM, Ladewig DJ, Satam G, Pellikka PA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Noseworthy PA, Munger TM et al (2019) Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med 25:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Meth 43:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cauwenberghs G, Poggio T (2001) Incremental and decremental support vector machine learning. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 409–415

  6. Chowdhary CL, Acharjya DP (2017) Clustering algorithm in possibilistic exponential fuzzy c-mean segmenting medical images. 30 12–23

  7. Chowdhary CL, Acharjya DP (2018) Segmentation of mammograms using a novel intuitionistic possibilistic fuzzy c-mean clustering algorithm. Nat Insp Comput 75–82

  8. Cocosco CA, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC (2003) A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method. Med Image Anal 7:513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Dahshan E-SA, Hosny T, Salem A-BM (2010) Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification. Digit Signal Process 20:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurovich Y, Hanani Y, Bar O, Nadav G, Fleischer N, Gelbman D, Basel-Salmon L, Krawitz PM, Kamphausen SB, Zenker M et al (2019) Identifying facial phenotypes of genetic disorders using deep learning. Nat Med 25:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannun AY, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, Tison GH, Bourn C, Turakhia MP, Ng AY (2019) Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med 25:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, Kinahan PE, Le Rest CC, Visvikis D (2017) Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present, any future?. Europ J Nucl Med Molec Imag 44:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM (1996) Artificial neural networks: A tutorial. J Comput 29:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, De Jong EEC, Van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A et al (2017) Radiomics: The bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clinic Oncol 14:749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Magnin B, Mesrob L, Kinkingnhun S, Plgrini-Issac M, Colliot O, Sarazin M, Dubois B, Lehricy S, Benali H (2009) Support vector machine-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease from whole-brain anatomical MRI. Neuroradiology 51:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohri N, Duan F, Snyder BS, Wei B, Machtay M, Alavi A, Siegel BA, Johnson DW, Bradley JD, DeNittis A et al (2016) Pretreatment 18f-FDG PET textural features in locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer: Secondary analysis of ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. J Nucl Med 57:842–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajpurkar P, Hannun AY, Haghpanahi M, Bourn C, Ng AY (2017) Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection with convolutional neural networks, arXiv:1707.01836, 1-10

  18. Ravizza S, Huschto T, Adamov A, Böhm L, Büsser A, Flöther FF, Hinzmann R, König H, McAhren SM, Robertson DH et al (2019) Predicting the early risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes using real-world data. Nat Med 25:57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sampat MP, Wang Z, Gupta S, Bovik AC, Markey MK (2009) Complex wavelet structural similarity: A new image similarity index. IEEE Trans Image Process 11:2385–2401

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez A, David V (2003) Advanced support vector machines and kernel methods. Neurocomputing 55:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tio TL, Cohen P, Coene PP, Udding J, Jager FCADH, Tytgat GNJ (1989) Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma: preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. Gastroenterology 96:1478–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Velazquez ER, Parmar C, Liu Y, Coroller TP, Cruz G, Stringfield O, Ye Z, Makrigiorgos M, Fennessy F, Mak RH et al (2017) Somatic mutations drive distinct imaging phenotypes in lung cancer. Cancer Res 77:3922–3930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z, Bovik AC (2002) A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process Lett 9:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13:600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Young AL, Marinescu RV, Oxtoby NP, Bocchetta M, Yong K, Firth NC, Cash DM, Thomas DL, Dick KM, Cardoso J et al (2018) Uncovering the heterogeneity and temporal complexity of neurodegenerative diseases with Subtype and Stage Inference. Nature Commun 9:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Dong Z, Wu L, Wang S (2011) A hybrid method for MRI brain image classification. Expert Syst Appl 38:10049–10053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang L, Zhou W, Jiao L (2004) Wavelet support vector machine. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 34:34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Prof. Wei Pang (School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK) is participated in writing or technical editing of the manuscript. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos.61772227, 61972174, 61972175), Science and Technology Development Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20180201045GX, 20200201300JC, 20200401083GX,20200201163JC), the Jilin Development and Reform Commission Fund(No. 2020C020-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sa Huang or You Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

Our research is approved by the ethics committee of Jilin university. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yizhang Wang and Tingting Gong contribute equally to the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Gong, T., Hassan, M. et al. A feature extraction based support vector machine model for rectal cancer T-stage prediction using MRI images. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 30907–30917 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11165-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11165-8

Keywords

Navigation