Skip to main content
Log in

Improving classification accuracy for prostate cancer using noise removal filter and deep learning technique

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prostate Cancer (PCa) can be considered as the second cause of death among men all over the world. Different techniques based on deep learning have been proposed for accurate PCa detection using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images. In this research work, an accurate 2d CNN-based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model is developed and implemented for PCa binary classification (0 for Benign and 1 for Malignant).The paper is aimed at improving the classification accuracy in two phases. The first one is to use image pre-processing algorithms such as (DICOM to jpg format, image resizing and labeling, adding noise, and noise removal by median filter). The second improvement is achieved by increasing the dataset size. The dataset of 20 patients were used which consist of 15 patients (3249 MRI slices) with cancerous tumor and 3 patients without cancer (1751 MRI slices). To evaluate the performance accuracy of the proposed approach, 30% of the dataset is used for the test and validation while 70% used for the training. The accuracy is found based on the Area under Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC). Test results indicate that the AUC is 0.98 without pre-processing whereas its value increased to 0.9993 with pre-processing using epoch iteration = 60 and the total dataset images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbasi AA, Hussain L, Awan IA et al (2020) Detecting prostate cancer using deep learning convolution neural network with transfer learning approach. Cogn Neurodyn 14:523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-020-09587-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AbdelazizIsmael SA, Mohammed A, Hefny H (2020) An enhanced deep learning approach for brain cancer MRI images classification using residual networks. Artif Intell Med 102:101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham B, Nair MS (2019) Automated grading of prostate cancer using convolutional neural network and ordinal class classifier. Inform Med Unlocked 17:100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2019.100256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aldoj N, Lukas S, Dewey M, Penzkofer T (2020) Semi-automatic classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MR imaging using a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network. Eur Radiol 30:1243–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06417-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharjee S, Park HG, Kim CH, et al (2019) Quantitative analysis of benign and malignant tumors in histopathology: Predicting prostate cancer grading using SVM. Appl Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9152969

  6. Celik Y, Talo M, Yildirim O et al (2020) Automated invasive ductal carcinoma detection based using deep transfer learning with whole-slide images. Pattern Recognit Lett 133:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaddad A, Kucharczyk MJ, Desrosiers C et al (2020) Deep radiomic analysis to predict Gleason score in prostate cancer. IEEE Access 8:167767–167778. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3023902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dargan S, Kumar M, Ayyagari MR et al (2020) A survey of deep learning and its applications: A new paradigm to machine learning. Arch Computat Methods Eng 27:1071–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09344-w

  9. De Vente C, Vos P, Hosseinzadeh M et al (2021) Deep learning regression for prostate cancer detection and grading in Bi-Parametric MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 68:374–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.2993528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duran-Lopez L, Dominguez-Morales JP, Conde-Martin AR et al (2020) PROMETEO: A CNN-based computer-aided diagnosis system for WSI prostate cancer detection. IEEE Access 8:128613–128628. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Imani F, Ghavidel S, Abolmaesumi P et al (2016) Fusion of multi-parametric MRI and temporal ultrasound for characterization of prostate cancer: in vivo feasibility study. Med Imaging 2016 Comput Diagnosis 9785:97851K. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217205

  12. Khoukhi HEl, Filali Y, Yahyaouy A (2019) Method for skin cancer image segmentation. 2019 Int Conf Wirel Technol Embed Intell Syst 1–5

  13. Kumar M, Chhabra P, Garg NK (2018) An efficient content based image retrieval system using BayesNet and K-NN. Multimed Tools Appl 77(16):21557–21570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar M, Jindal MK, Sharma RK, Jindal SR (2020) Performance evaluation of classifiers for the recognition of offline handwritten Gurmukhi characters and numerals: a study. Artif Intell Rev 53(3):2075–2097

  15. Lemaître G, Martí R, Freixenet J et al (2015) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis for prostate cancer based on mono and multi-parametric MRI: A review. Comput Biol Med 60:8–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, An X (2018) A classification model for the prostate cancer based on deep learning. Proc - 2017 10th Int Congr Image Signal Process Biomed Eng Informatics, CISP-BMEI 2017 2018-Janua:1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302240

  17. Liu S, Feng Y, Zheng H, Feng Y, Li W (2017) Prostate cancer diagnosis using deep learning with 3d multiparametric MRI. arXiv 3–6.https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2277121

  18. Liu Z, Yang C, Huang J et al (2021) Deep learning framework based on integration of S-Mask R-CNN and Inception-v3 for ultrasound image-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer. Futur Gener Comput Syst 114:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Minz A, Mahobiya C (2017) MR image classification using adaboost for brain tumor type. Proc - 7th IEEE Int Adv Comput Conf IACC, 701–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/IACC.2017.0146

  20. Mohammadi Z, Seyyed Mahdavi Chabok SJ (2018) A novel and reliable computational intelligence system for breast cancer detection. Med Biol Eng Comput 56:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1721-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinckaers H, Bulten W, van der Laak J, Litjens G (2020) Detection of prostate cancer in whole-slide images through end-to-end training with image-level labels. arXiv XX 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2021.3066295.

  22. Saba T (2020) Recent advancement in cancer detection using machine learning: Systematic survey of decades, comparisons and challenges. J Infect Public Health 13:1274–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Salehi AW, Baglat P, Sharma BB, et al (2020) A CNN Model: Earlier Diagnosis and Classification of Alzheimer Disease using MRI. Proc - Int Conf Smart Electron Commun ICOSEC, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSEC49089.2020.9215402

  24. Shao W, Banh L, Kunder CA et al (2021) ProsRegNet: A deep learning framework for registration of MRI and histopathology images of the prostate. Med Image Anal 68:101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. S, R. C (2018) An efficient mri noise removal technique using linear and nonlinear filters. Int J Comput 179:17–20. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018915777

  26. Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE et al (2018) Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68:284–296. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (2020) Estimated number of new cases in 2020. In: website. https://www.uicc.org/sites/main/files/thumbnails/image/Men%27scancer2020.png. Accessed 27 Mar 2021

  28. Yoo S, Gujrathi I, Haider MA, Khalvati F (2019) Prostate cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55972-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aree A. Mohammed.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A.M., Mohammed, A.A. Improving classification accuracy for prostate cancer using noise removal filter and deep learning technique. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 8653–8669 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12102-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12102-z

Keywords

Navigation