Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized multimodal medical image fusion framework using multi-scale geometric and multi-resolution geometric analysis

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For proper homoeopathic identification of the medical image, image fusion has been proposed as a mandatory solution to obtain high-spectral and high-spectral spatial data. This article presents a complete fusion system for several types of medical images according to their multi-resolution, multi-scale transforms and the Modified Central Force Optimization (MCFO) technique. Four main techniques have been proposed for this purpose; Optimized Discrete Wavelet and Dual-Tree based fusion techniques as a multi-resolution transform. Besides, the optimized Non-Sub-Sampled Contourlet and Non-Sub-Sampled Shearlet as multi-scale fusion techniques. The perfect matching between input images and minimum artifacts after image registration can be achieved through four stages in the proposed fusion algorithms. First, the input medical image is initially decomposed into their coefficients, and the MCFO method establishes the optimal gain parameter values of the resulted coefficients. Finally, the adaptive histogram equalization and the histogram matching are applied for higher clearness and better visualization of information details. The proposed algorithms are evaluated using various datasets for different medical and surveillance applications through some quality metrics. The Experimental test outcomes indicate that the proposed fusion algorithms achieve good performance with high image quality and appreciated estimation metrics principles. Moreover, it provides better image visualization and minimum processing time, which helps diagnose diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atrey P, Hossain M, El-Saddik A, Kankanhalli M (2010) Multimodal fusion for multimedia analysis: a survey. Multimedia Systems 16(6):345–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bick M (2015) Central force optimization-analysis of Data Structures & Multiplicity Factor (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo).

  3. Chai Y, He Y, Ying C (2008) CT and MRI image fusion based on contourlet using a novel rule. In 2nd IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE) pp. 2064-2067

  4. Da Cunha A, Zhou J, Do M (2006) The nonsubsampled contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(10):3089–3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel E, Anitha J, Kamaleshwaran K, Rani I (2017) Optimum spectrum mask based medical image fusion using gray wolf optimization. Biomed Signal Process Control 34:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donia E, El-Banby G, EL-Rabaie E, Faragallah O, El-Samie F (2016) Infrared image enhancement based on both histogram matching and wavelet fusion. In fourth IEEE international Japan-Egypt conference on electronics, communications and computers (JEC-ECC) pp. 111-114.

  7. Easley G, Labate D, Lim W (2008) Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 25(1):25–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Goshtasby A, Nikolov S (2007) Image fusion: advances in the state of the art. Inf fusion 2(8):114–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han Y, Yang Y, Wu F, Hong R (2015) Compact and discriminative descriptor inference using multi-cues. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(12):5114–5126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou R, Zhou D, Nie R, Liu D, Ruan X (2019) Brain CT and MRI medical image fusion using convolutional neural networks and a dual-channel spiking cortical model. Med Biol Eng Comput 57(4):887–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. https://medpix.nlm.nih.gov/home. Last accessed on 20/12/2018.

  12. Huang B, Yang F, Yin M, Mo X, Zhong C (2020) Review article: a review of multimodal medical image fusion techniques. Computational and Mathematical Methods 8279342

  13. Jagalingam P, Hegde A (2015) A review of quality metrics for fused image. Aquatic Procedia 4:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. James A, Dasarathy B (2014) Medical image fusion: a survey of the state of the art. Information Fusion 19:4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kannan K, Perumal S (2007) Optimal decomposition level of discrete wavelet transform for pixel based fusion of multi-focused images. In IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA) pp. 314-318.

  16. KoteswaraRao K, Swamy K. Veera (2019) Multimodal Medical Image Fusion using NSCT and DWT Fusion Frame Work. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng ISSN: 2278–3075, 9(2) December 2019.

  17. KoteswaraRao K, Veera Swamy K (2019) Multimodal medical image fusion using NSCT and DWT fusion frame work. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng ISSN: 2278 9(2):3075

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee D, Yamamoto A (1994) Wavelet analysis: theory and applications. Hewlett Packard J 45:44–44

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Zhao J (2021) A novel multi-modal medical image fusion algorithm. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12(2021):1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li X, Zhao J (2021) A novel multi-modal medical image fusion algorithm. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12:1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li S, Yang B, Hu J (2011) Performance comparison of different multi-resolution transforms for image fusion. Inf Fusion 12(2):74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Liu S, Wang Z (2014) Medical image fusion by combining nonsubsampled contourlet transform and sparse representation. In Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (CCPR) pp. 372-381.

  23. Mahmoud K (2016) Synthesis of unequally-spaced linear array using modified central force optimisation algorithm. IET Microw Antennas Propag 10(10):1011–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miao Q, Shi C, Xu P, Yang M, Shi Y (2011) A novel algorithm of image fusion using shearlets. Opt Commun 284(6):1540–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajalingam B et al (2019) Hybrid multimodal medical image fusion using combination of transform techniques for disease analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 152(2019):150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajalingam B et al (2019) Hybrid multimodal medical image fusion using combination of transform techniques for disease analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 152:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raut G, Paikrao P, Chaudhari D (2013) A study of quality assessment techniques for fused images. Int J Innov Technol Exploring Eng 2(4):290–294

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shahdoosti HR, Tabatabaei Z (2019) MRI and PET/SPECT image fusion at feature level using ant colony based segmentation. Biomed Signal Process Control 47:63–74 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh S, Anand RS (2019) Multimodal neurological image fusion based on adaptive biological inspired neural model in nonsubsampled shearlet domain. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 29(1):50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh T, Kaur M, Kaur A, Amritsar G (2013) A detailed comparative study of various image fusion techniques used in digital images. Int J Adv Engg Tech 50:52

    Google Scholar 

  31. Singh A, Yadav S, Singh N (2016) Contrast enhancement and brightness preservation using global-local image enhancement techniques. In fourth IEEE international conference on parallel, distributed and grid computing (PDGC) pp. 291-294.

  32. Song H, Qiu P (2017) Intensity-based 3D local image registration. Pattern Recogn Lett 94:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sotiras A, Davatzikos C, Paragios N (2013) Deformable medical image registration: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(7):1153–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Suganya R, Priyadharsini K, Rajaram S (2010) Intensity based image registration by maximization of mutual information. Int J Comput Appl 1(20):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Pan Z (2017) Image contrast enhancement using adjacent-blocks-based modification for local histogram equalization. Infrared Phys Technol 86:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Tao J (2006) A fast implementation of adaptive histogram equalization. In 8th IEEE international conference on signal processing (ICSP), vol. 2.

  37. Wang A, Sun H, Guan Y (2006) The application of wavelet transform to multi-modality medical image fusion. In IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC) pp. 270-274

  38. Wu A, Han Y (2018) Multi-modal Circulant fusion for video-to-language and backward. In IJCAI 3(4):8

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xing X, Li J, Fan Q, Shang W (2016) An image fusion algorithm based on non-subsampled shearlet transform and compressed sensing. Int J Signal Process Image Process Pattern Recog 9(3):61–70

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang H, Lee Y, Fan Y, Taso H (2007) A novel algorithm of local contrast enhancement for medical image. In IEEE nuclear science symposium conference record (NSSCR) pp. 3951-3954.

  41. Yang L, Guo B, Ni W (2008) Multimodality medical image fusion based on multi-scale geometric analysis of contourlet transform. Neurocomputing 72(1–3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang Y, Wang S, Ji G (2015) A comprehensive survey on particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications. Math Probl Eng 2015:1–38

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng Y, Hou X, Bian T, Qin Z (2007) Effective image fusion rules of multi-scale image decomposition. In 5th IEEE International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISISPA) pp. 362-366

  44. Zitova B, Flusser J (2003) Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput 21(11):977–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/08), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osama S. Faragallah.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faragallah, O.S., El-Hoseny, H., El-Shafai, W. et al. Optimized multimodal medical image fusion framework using multi-scale geometric and multi-resolution geometric analysis. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 14379–14401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12260-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12260-0

Keywords

Navigation