Skip to main content
Log in

Anaphora resolved abstractive text summarization (AR-ATS) system

  • Track 1: General Multimedia Topics
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Many people in this world are fond of reading, and text format is regarded as the official way of communication. This has resulted in an increased production of text data in a highly exponential way. consequently, people were looking for a way where they need not have to spend much time in reading the entire information provided by articles, books and so on. Moreover, people are compelled to read entire newspapers or desired articles in a short span of time in the middle of their busy schedules. So, people were looking for a simplified strategy of “Read less, get more content”. Summarization of books,0 articles and newspapers reduces the time taken to understand the content present in them. Abstractive text summarization involves summarizing the given text by reorganizing the whole text using syntactic and semantic text analysis. It includes the capability of synthesizing a compressed form of the original sentences or it may constitute novel sentences with the same semantic sense, which may not be present in the original source document. This system focusses on the different algorithms that have been developed to deal with the challenging problem of Anaphora Resolved Abstractive Text Summarization. It produces an abstractive summary that has mismatches between anaphors and their antecedents. The problem of the mapping of events with their source is addressed by the AR-ATS method, which resolves several types of anaphora that are present in prominent and common text document. Anaphora resolution involves mapping the anaphors with their antecedents which allows the semantic analysis more effective and thereby increases the efficiency of the summary produced by the method. Then the anaphora resolved words are semantically analyzed and create a flawless summary of the text document with complete analysis of the events and their sources. The whole system was successfully evaluated by various benchmark datasets, and it was shown that algorithms mentioned earlier are efficient for abstractive summarization of text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antony A (2015) ‘pronominal anaphora resolution in english using a statistical approach.’. In: Proceedings of the IEEE

  2. Antunes J, Lins R D, Lima R, Oliveira H, Riss M, Simske S J (2018) Automatic cohesive summarization with pronominal anaphora resolution. Comput Speech Lang 52:141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Athira S, Lekshmi TS, Rajeev RR, Sherly E, Reghuraj PC (2014) Pronominal anaphora resolution using salience score for malayalam. In: First IEEE International conference on computational systems and communications (ICCSC), pp 47–51

  4. Azmi A M, Altmami N I (2018) An abstractive arabic text summarizer with user controlled granularity. Inform Process Manag 54(6):903–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin B (1997) Cogniac: high precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguistic resources. In: Robust anaphora resolution for unrestricted texts. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 38–45

  6. Barzilay R, McKeown K R (2005) Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization. Comput Linguist 31(3):297–328

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Belkebir R, Guessoum A (2016) Concept generalization and fusion for abstractive sentence generation. Expert Syst Appl 53:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charniak E (1997) Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. AAAI/IAAI 2005(18):598–603

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chianese A, Marulli F, Moscato V, Piccialli F (2013) A “smart” multimedia guide for indoor contextual navigation in cultural heritage applications. In: IEEE International conference on indoor positioning and indoor navigation (IPIN), pp 1–6

  10. Chianese A, Piccialli F (2014) Smach: a framework for smart cultural heritage spaces. In: Tenth IEEE International conference on signal-image technology and internet-based systems (SITIS), pp 477–484

  11. Cilibrasi R L, Vitanyi P M B (2007) The google similarity distance. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(3):370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuomo S, De Michele P, Piccialli F, Galletti A, Jung J E (2017) Iot-based collaborative reputation system for associating visitors and artworks in a cultural scenario. Expert Syst Appl 79:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Durrett G, Berg-Kirkpatrick T, Klein D (2016) Learning-based single-document summarization with compression and anaphoricity constraints. arXiv:1603.08887

  14. Evans R, Orasan C (2000) Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts. In: Proceedings of the discourse anaphora and reference resolution conference (DAARC), pp 154–162

  15. Farina R, Cuomo S, De Michele P, Piccialli F (2013) A smart gpu implementation of an elliptic kernel for an ocean global circulation model. Appl Math Sci 7(61–64):3007–3021

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gambhir M, Gupta V (2017) Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey. Artif Intell Rev 47(1):1–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gatt A, Reiter E (2009) Simplenlg: a realisation engine for practical applications. In: 12th European workshop on natural language generation. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 90–93

  18. Ge N, Hale J, Charniak E (1998) A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In: Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora

  19. Genest P-E, Lapalme G (2010) Text generation for abstractive summarization. In: TAC

  20. Hobbs J (1978) Pronoun resolution. Lingua 44:339–352

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ingria Robert JP, Stallard D (1989) A computational mechanism for pronominal reference. In: 27th Annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 262–271

  22. Kamune K P, Agrawal A (2015) Hybrid approach to pronominal anaphora resolution in english newspaper text. Int J Intell Syst Applic 7(2):56

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karthikeyan K, Karthikeyani V (2013) Understanding text using anaphora resolution. In: IEEE International conference on pattern recognition, informatics and mobile engineering (PRIME), pp 346–350

  24. Kennedy C, Boguraev B (1996) Anaphora for everyone: pronominal anaphora resoluation without a parser. In: Association for Computational Linguistics, vol 1, pp 113–118

  25. Khan A, Salim N, Kumar Y J (2015) A framework for multi-document abstractive summarization based on semantic role labelling. Appl Soft Comput 30:737–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lappin S, Leass H J (1994) An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Comput Linguistics 20(4):535–561

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu F, Flanigan J, Thomson S, Sadeh N, Smith N A (2018) Toward abstractive summarization using semantic representations. arXiv:1805.10399

  28. Lloret E, Palomar M (2012) Text summarisation in progress: a literature review. Artif Intell Rev 37(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller G (1995) ’wordnet, a lexical database for english communications of the acm ’, vol 38, pp 39–41

  30. Mitkov R (1998) Evaluating anaphora resolution approaches. In: Proceedings of the discourse anaphora and anaphora resolution colloquium (DAARC’2), pp 164–172

  31. Mitkov R (2014) Anaphora resolution. Routledge

  32. Mitkov R, Evans R, Orasan C (2002) A new, fully automatic version of mitkovs knowledge-poor pronoun resolution method. In: International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics. Springer, pp 168–186

  33. Moratanch N, Chitrakala S (2016) A survey on abstractive text summarization. In: IEEE International conference on circuit, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT), pp 1–7

  34. Moratanch N, Chitrakala S (2018) A novel framework for semantic oriented abstractive text summarization. J Web Eng 17(8):675–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Orasan C, Evans R J (2007) Np animacy identification for anaphora resolution. J Artif Intell Res 29:79–103

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Orsan C, Evans R (2001) Learning to identify animate references. In: Workshop on computational natural language learning, vol 7. Association for Computational Linguistics, p 16

  37. Piccialli F, Cuomo S, De Michele P (2013) A regularized mri image reconstruction based on hessian penalty term on cpu/gpu systems. Procedia Comput Sci 18:2643–2646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Qiu L, Kan M-Y, Chua T-S (2004) A public reference implementation of the rap anaphora resolution algorithm. arXiv:cs/0406031/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Moratanch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moratanch, N., Chitrakala, S. Anaphora resolved abstractive text summarization (AR-ATS) system. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 4569–4597 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13299-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13299-9

Keywords

Navigation