Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient deep convolutional neural network with features fusion for radar signal recognition

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an efficient deep convolutional neural network with features fusion for recognizing radar signal, which mainly includes data pre-processing, features extraction, multi-features fusion, and classification. Radar signals are first transformed into time-frequency images by using choi-williams distribution and smooth pseudo-wigner-ville distribution, and the image pre-processing methods are used to resize and normalize the time-frequency images. Then, two constructed deep convolutional neural network models are aimed to extract more effective features. Furthermore, a multi-features fusion model is proposed to integrate features extracted from two deep convolutional neural network models, which makes full use of the relationship among different features and further improves the recognition performance. Experimental results shown that the average recognition accuracy of the proposed method is up to 84.38% when the signal to noise ratio is at −12 dB, and even reach to 94.31% at −10 dB, which achieved the superior recognition performance than others, especially at the lower signal to noise ratio. Moreover, the recognition performance of various radar signals can be largely improved, especially for 2FSK, 4FSK and SFM. This work provides a sound experimental foundation for further improving radar signal recognition in modern electronic warfare systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ayazgok S, Erdem C, Ozturk MT, Orduyilmaz A, Serin M (2018) Automatic antenna scan type classification for next-generation electronic warfare receivers. IET Radar Sonar Navig 12(4):466–474. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bu K, He Y, Jing X, Han J (2020) Adversarial transfer learning for deep learning based automatic modulation classification. IEEE Signal Process Lett 27:880–884. https://doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2020.2991875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao R, Cao JW, Mei JP, Yin C, Huang XG (2019) Radar emitter identification with bispectrum and hierarchical extreme learning machine. Multimed Tools Appl 78(20):28953–28970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6134-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan X, Li T, Su S (2017) Intrapulse modulation type recognition for pulse compression radar signal. J Appl Remote Sens 11(3):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.035018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng Z, Liang M, Chu F (2013) Recent advances in time–frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: a review with application examples. Mech Syst Signal Proc 38(1):165–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han L, Gao F, Li Z, Dobre OA (2017) Low complexity automatic modulation classification based on order-statistics. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 16(1):400–411. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2016.2623716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazar MA, Odaba N, Ensari T, Kavurucu Y, Sayan OF (2018) Performance analysis and improvement of machine learning algorithms for automatic modulation recognition over Rayleigh fading channels. Neural Comput Appl 29(9):351–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3040-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In proceedings of the 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR). IEEE 770–778

  9. Huang S, Yao Y, Wei Z, Feng Z, Zhang P (2017) Automatic modulation classification of overlapped sources using multiple Cumulants. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(7):6089–6101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2636324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kingma DP, Ba J (2015) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In proceedings of the 2015 3rd international conference for learning representations. IEEE 1–15

  11. Kishore TR, Rao KD (2017) Automatic intrapulse modulation classification of advanced LPI radar waveforms. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 53(2):901–914. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2017.2667142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li DJ, Yang RJ, Dong RJ, Zuo JJ (2020) Emitter signals modulation recognition based on discriminative projection and collaborative representation. IET Radar Sonar Navig 14(5):782–791. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Linh Manh H, Kim M, Kong S-H (2019) Automatic recognition of general LPI radar waveform using SSD and supplementary classifier. IEEE Trans Signal Process 67(13):3516–3530. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2019.2918983

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Xiao P, Wu H, Xiao W (2015) LPI radar signal detection based on radial integration of Choi-Williams time-frequency image. J Syst Eng Electron 26(5):973–981. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEE.2015.00106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S, Yan X, Li P, Hao X, Wang K (2018) Radar emitter recognition based on SIFT position and scale features. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 65(12):2062–2066. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2018.2819666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma N, Wang J (2013) Dynamic threshold for SPWVD parameter estimation based on Otsu algorithm. J Syst Eng Electron 24(6):919–924. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEE.2013.00107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meng F, Chen P, Wu L, Wang X (2018) Automatic modulation classification: a deep learning enabled approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 67(11):10760–10772. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2868698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin Z, Zhou X, Zhang L, Gao Y, Liang Y-C, Li GY (2019) 20 years of evolution from cognitive to intelligent communications. IEEE Signal Process Lett 6(1):6–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2019.2949279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qu Z, Mao X, Deng Z (2018) Radar signal intra-pulse modulation recognition based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 6:43874–43884. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2864347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qu ZY, Wang WY, Hou CB, Hou CF (2019) Radar signal intra-pulse modulation recognition based on convolutional Denoising autoencoder and deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 7:112339–112347. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2935247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qu Z, Hou C, Hou C, Wang W (2020) Radar signal intra-pulse modulation recognition based on convolutional neural network and deep Q-learning network. IEEE Access 8:49125–49136. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qu Q, Wei S, Wu Y, Wang M (2020) ACSE networks and autocorrelation features for PRI modulation recognition. IEEE Commun Lett 24(8):1729–1733. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2020.2992266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandler M, Howard A, Zhu M, Zhmoginov A, Chen L (2018) MobileNetV2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In proceedings of the 2018 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE 4510–4520

  24. Shao G, Chen Y, Wei Y (2020) Deep fusion for radar jamming signal classification based on CNN. IEEE Access 8:117236–117244. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Si W, Wan C, Zhang C (2020) Towards an accurate radar waveform recognition algorithm based on dense CNN. Multimed Tools Appl:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09490-5

  26. Tan M, Le QV (2019) EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In proceedings of the 2019 international conference on machine learning. IEEE 6105–6114

  27. Wei W, Mendel JM (2000) Maximum-likelihood classification for digital amplitude-phase modulations. IEEE Trans Commun 48(2):189–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.823550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Z, Zhou S, Yin Z, Ma B, Yang Z (2017) Robust automatic modulation classification under varying noise conditions. IEEE Access 5:19733–19741. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2746140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H, Yu L, Xia GS (2016) Iterative time-frequency filtering of sinusoidal signals with updated frequency estimation. IEEE Signal Process Lett 23(1):139–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2015.2504565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Z, Wang C, Gan C, Sun S, Wang M (2019) Automatic modulation classification using convolutional neural network with features fusion of SPWVD and BJD. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing Over Networks 5(3):469–478. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsipn.2019.2900201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61671168 and 61801143), in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant No. JJ2019LH1760 and LH2020F019), in part by the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2019010P6001 and 2019010P6002), and in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. HEUCFJ180801).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhian Deng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of internet

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of internet to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Si, W., Wan, C. & Deng, Z. An efficient deep convolutional neural network with features fusion for radar signal recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 2871–2885 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13407-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13407-9

Keywords

Navigation