Abstract
Various Internet of Things (IoT) applications are based and deployed on unstable wireless networks like the Delay Tolerant Network (DTN). But effective DTN data transmission seems to be an important concern for IoT applications. Vehicular Delay Tolerant Network (VDTN) is also one of the DTN application areas. Despite communication problems, VDTNs’ consist of mobile devices that communicate wirelessly with one another to transmit data. This article highlights the issue of certain nodes that tend to disrupt a VDTN’s connection. The case of nodes that interrupt the transmission of messages, which is an immensely challenging type of misconduct to recognize, is described in the article. We investigate the influence of this type of misconduct on nine VDTN routing algorithms using two different types of scenarios as well as a wide range of simulations. The outcomes indicate that focusing on the form of inappropriate behavior, duplication of messages, and smart selection of a next-hop can assist routing methods to be resistant to misconduct by nodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed SH, Kang H, Kim D (2015) Vehicular delay tolerant network (vdtn): routing perspectives. In: 2015 12th Annual IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC). IEEE, pp 898–903
Ashton K et al (2009) That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFID J 22 (7):97–114
Avižienis A (2017) Document faults: an extension of the taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. In: 2017 47th Annual IEEE/IFIP international conference on dependable systems and networks workshops (DSN-W). IEEE, pp 113–114
Balasubramanian A, Levine B, Venkataramani A (2007) Dtn routing as a resource allocation problem. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, pp 373–384
Benamar M, Benamar N, El Ouadghiri D (2015) The effect of cooperation of nodes on vdtn routing protocols. In: 2015 International conference on wireless networks and mobile communications (WINCOM). IEEE, pp 1–7
Bose Paul A, Mondal S, Biswas S, Nandi S (2020) Ta-acs: a trust aware adaptive carrier selection scheme for reliable routing in delay tolerant networks. In: International conference on innovations for community services. Springer, pp 227–244
Burgess J, Gallagher B, Jensen DD, Levine BN et al (2006) Maxprop: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks.. In: Infocom. Barcelona, Spain, vol 6
Burleigh S, Hooke A, Torgerson L, Fall K, Cerf V, Durst B, Scott K, Weiss H (2003) Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary internet. IEEE Commun Mag 41(6):128–136
Chhabra A, Vashishth V, Sharma DK (2017) A game theory based secure model against black hole attacks in opportunistic networks. In: 2017 51st Annual conference on information sciences and systems (CISS). IEEE, pp 1–6
Dias JAFF (2017) Performance of management solutions and cooperation approaches for vehicular delay-tolerant networks. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade da Beira Interior (Portugal
Huang T-K, Lee C-K, Chen L-J (2010) Prophet+: an adaptive prophet-based routing protocol for opportunistic network. In: 2010 24th IEEE international conference on advanced information networking and applications. IEEE, pp 112–119
Ilyas M, Ullah Z, Khan FA, Chaudary MH, Malik MSA, Zaheer Z, Durrani HUR (2020) Trust-based energy-efficient routing protocol for internet of things–based sensor networks. Int J Distributed Sensor Netw 16(10):1550147720964358
Kang H, Ahmed SH, Kim D, Chung Y-S (2015) Routing protocols for vehicular delay tolerant networks: a survey. Int J Distributed Sensor Netw 11(3):325027
Khalid W, Ullah Z, Ahmed N, Cao Y, Khalid M, Arshad M, Ahmad F, Cruickshank H (2018) A taxonomy on misbehaving nodes in delay tolerant networks. Comput Secur 77:442–471
Lindgren A, Doria A, Schelen O (2004) Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks. In: International workshop on service assurance with partial and intermittent resources. Springer, pp 239–254
Loudari SE, Benamar M, Benamar N (2015) New classification of nodes cooperation in delay tolerant networks. In: International symposium on ubiquitous networking. Springer, pp 301–309
Lu X, Hui P (2010) An energy-efficient n-epidemic routing protocol for delay tolerant networks. In: 2010 IEEE fifth international conference on networking, Architecture, and Storage. IEEE, pp 341–347
Ma M, He D, Wang H, Kumar N, Choo K-KR (2019) An efficient and provably secure authenticated key agreement protocol for fog-based vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Int Things J 6(5):8065–8075
Magaia N, Pereira PR, Correia MP (2013) Selfish and malicious behavior in delay-tolerant networks. In: 2013 Future network & mobile summit. IEEE, pp 1–10
Manman L, Xin Q, Goswami P, Mukherjee A, Yang L (2020) Energy-efficient dynamic clustering for iot applications: a neural network approach. In: 2020 IEEE eighth international conference on communications and networking (ComNet). IEEE, pp 1–7
Mao Y, Zhou C, Ling Y, Lloret J (2019) An optimized probabilistic delay tolerant network (dtn) routing protocol based on scheduling mechanism for internet of things (iot). Sensors 19(2):243
Massri K, Vitaletti A, Vernata A, Chatzigiannakis I (2016) Routing protocols for delay tolerant networks: a reference architecture and a thorough quantitative evaluation. J Sensor Actuator Netw 5(2):6
Moetesum M, Hadi F, Imran M, Minhas AA, Vasilakos AV (2016) An adaptive and efficient buffer management scheme for resource-constrained delay tolerant networks. Wireless Netw 22(7):2189–2201
Mukherjee A, Goswami P, Khan MA, Manman L, Yang L, Pillai P (2020) Energy-efficient resource allocation strategy in massive iot for industrial 6g applications. IEEE Internet Things J 8(7):5194–5201
Mukherjee A, Jain DK, Yang L (2020) On-demand efficient clustering for next generation iot applications: a hybrid nn approach. IEEE Sensors J 21(22):25457–25464
Nagrath P, Aneja S, Gupta N, Madria S (2016) Protocols for mitigating blackhole attacks in delay tolerant networks. Wirel Netw 22(1):235–246
Ning Z, Liu L, Xia F, Jedari B, Lee I, Zhang W (2016) Cais: a copy adjustable incentive scheme in community-based socially aware networking. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(4):3406–3419
Nobahary S, Garakani HG, Khademzadeh A, Rahmani AM (2019) Selfish node detection based on hierarchical game theory in iot. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2019(1):1–19
Oorschot V (2020) P.c. cryptographic building blocks. In: Computer security and the internet. Springer, pp 29–53
Rehman G-U, Ghani A, Muhammad S, Singh M, Singh D (2020) Selfishness in vehicular delay-tolerant networks: a review. Sensors 20(10):3000
Rehman GU, Ghani A, Zubair M, Ghayyure SA, Muhammad S (2021) Honesty based democratic scheme to improve community cooperation for internet of things based vehicular delay tolerant networks. Trans Emerging Telecommun Technol 32(1):e4191
Rehman G-U, Ghani A, Zubair M, Naqvi SHA, Singh D, Muhammad S (2019) Ips: incentive and punishment scheme for omitting selfishness in the internet of vehicles (iov). IEEE Access 7:109026–109037
Rehman GU, Ghani A, Zubair M, Saeed MI, Singh D (2020) Sos: socially omitting selfishness in iot for smart and connected communities. Int J Commun Syst:e4455
Saleem MA, Shijie Z, Sharif A (2019) Data transmission using iot in vehicular ad-hoc networks in smart city congestion. Mobile Netw Appl 24(1):248–258
Sharma A, Gupta P, Grover J (2016) Configuration of one simulator using eclipse. IOSR J Electr Commun Eng 1:110–118
Solis J, Asokan N, Kostiainen K, Ginzboorg P, Ott J (2010) Controlling resource hogs in mobile delay-tolerant networks. Comput Commun 33 (1):2–10
Souza C, Mota E, Galvao L, Manzoni P, Cano JC, Calafate CT (2016) Fsf: friendship and selfishness forwarding for delay tolerant networks. In: 2016 IEEE symposium on computers and communication (ISCC). IEEE, pp 1200–1207
Souza C, Mota E, Galvao L, Manzoni P, Cano JC, Calafate CT (2016) Fsf: friendship and selfishness forwarding for delay tolerant networks. In: 2016 IEEE symposium on computers and communication (ISCC). IEEE, pp 1200–1207
Spaho E (2020) Energy consumption analysis of different routing protocols in a delay tolerant network. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 11(9):3833–3839
Spyropoulos T, Psounis K, Raghavendra CS (2005) Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking, pp 252–259
Swati, Sivia JS, Bindra HS (2019) Sprp: a secured routing protocol for delay tolerant networks. Int J Sensor Netw 31(3):156–171
Wang H, Feng G, Wang H, Lv H, Zhou R (2018) Rabp: delay/disruption tolerant network routing and buffer management algorithm based on weight. Int J Distributed Sensor Netw 14(3):1550147718757874
You I, Sharma V, Atiquzzaman M, Choo K-KR (2016) Gdtn: genome-based delay tolerant network formation in heterogeneous 5g using inter-ua collaboration. PloS One 11(12):e0167913
Zekkori H, Agoujil S et al (2019) Hybrid delay tolerant network routing protocol for heterogeneous networks. J Netw Comput Appl 148:102456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This work is carried out in collaboration between all authors. G.U.R and D.M.I.H performed a detailed study and analysis. D.S, Z.M, and M.S managed the literature searches. M.Z wrote the first draft of the manuscript in consultation with G.U.R. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rehman, G.U., Haq, M.I.U., Zubair, M. et al. Misbehavior of nodes in IoT based vehicular delay tolerant networks VDTNs. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 7841–7859 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13624-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13624-2