Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An ingenious ROBD system to slay invasion attack for profitable spectrum utilization

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the cognitive radio network is the emerging technology for avoiding the underutilization of spectrum by allowing secondary users (SU) to share with the licensed band of the primary user (PU), it has its disadvantages such as QoS degradation, connection unavailability, Denial of service and bandwidth waste due to false signal injecting by the secondary users. Moreover, howbeit existing techniques have mitigated the underutilization of spectrum band, it has brought degradation to primary users due to lack of cooperative optimal sensing. To solve these problems, this work proposed a Reservation Optimized Bias Decomposition system (ROBD) to sense the available spectrum and reserve the spectrum based on user needs and employ slots to share a shared transmission resource, resulting in greater spectrum usage. By reducing the false signal into a series of smallest feasible sub-problems and solving them analytically, optimized bias decomposition techniques are used to discover and eliminate the internally injected false signal. As a result, issues like QoS deterioration, connection unavailability, denial of service, and bandwidth wastage has been removed. If the crumbled signal has high bias and variance when tested with the trained model it would be filtered this leads to less packet drop and high quality of service. The proposed method has obtained a higher throughput of 4.6052 and a low packet drop of 28.47 bits/sec, such a way the proposed method outperforms the other existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz IF, … Mohanty S (2008) A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Commun Mag 46(4):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali A, Hamouda W (2017) Advances on spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks: theory and applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 19(2):1277–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali A, Zhu Y, Chen Q, Yu J, Cai H (2019) Leveraging spatio-temporal patterns for predicting citywide traffic crowd flows using deep hybrid neural networks. In 2019 IEEE 25th international conference on parallel and distributed systems (ICPADS). IEEE:125–132

  4. Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2021) A data aggregation based approach to exploit dynamic spatio-temporal correlations for citywide crowd flows prediction in fog computing. Multimed Tools Appl 80(20):31401–31433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2021) Exploiting dynamic spatio-temporal correlations for citywide traffic flow prediction using attention based neural networks. Inf Sci 577:852–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2022) Exploiting dynamic spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural networks for citywide traffic flows prediction. Neural Netw 145:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anandakumar H, Umamaheswari K (2017) Supervised machine learning techniques in cognitive radio networks during cooperative spectrum handovers. Clust Comput 20(2):1505–1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anandakumar H, Umamaheswari K (2017) An efficient optimized handover in cognitive radio networks using cooperative spectrum sensing. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 1-8.

  9. Arjoune Y, Kaabouch N (2019) A comprehensive survey on spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: recent advances, new challenges, and future research directions. Sensors 19(1):126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Awe OP, Deligiannis A, Lambotharan S (2018) Spatio-temporal spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks using Beamformer-aided SVM algorithms. IEEE Access 6:25377–25388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen K, Chen F, Lai B, Jin Z, Liu Y, Li K, Wei L, Wang P, Tang Y, Huang J, Hua XS (2020) Dynamic spatio-temporal graph-based CNNs for traffic flow prediction. IEEE Access 8:185136–185145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dannana S, Chapa BP, Rao GS (2018) Spectrum sensing using matched filter detection. In Intelligent Engineering Informatics. Springer, Singapore 497-503.

  13. Eappen G, Shankar T (2020) Hybrid PSO-GSA for energy efficient spectrum sensing in cognitive radio network. Physical Commun 40:101091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elnahas O, … Furukawa H (2018) Game theoretic approaches for cooperative Spectrum sensing in energy-harvesting cognitive radio networks. IEEE Access 6:11086–11100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghasemi A, Elvino Sousa S (2008) Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: requirements, challenges and design trade-offs. IEEE Commun Mag 46(4):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kar S, Sethi S, Sahoo RK (2017) A multi-factor trust management scheme for secure spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Wirel Pers Commun 97(2):2523–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karimi M, Sadough SMS, Torabi M (2020) Enhanced physical layer security for cognitive radio systems through joint spectrum access and power allocation. IET Commun 14(18):3135–3142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Z, Yu FR, Huang M (2009) A distributed consensus-based cooperative spectrum-sensing scheme in cognitive radios. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(1):383–393

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liang Y-C et al (2008) Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(4):1326–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma J, Zhao G, Li Y (2008) Soft combination and detection for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(11):4502–4507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mapunya S, Velempini M (2018) Investigating spectrum sensing security threats in cognitive radio networks. In: Ad hoc networks. Springer, Cham, pp 60–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mummoorthy A, Suresh Kumar S (2012) A detailed study on evolution of recent jammers in wireless sensor networks. Int J Eng Res Dev 4(6)

  23. Niyato D, Hossain E (2008) Competitive spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: a dynamic game approach. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(7)

  24. Pandit S, Singh G (2017) In overview of spectrum sharing techniques in cognitive radio communication system. Wirel Netw 23(2):497–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultana A, Fernando X, Zhao L An overview of medium access control strategies for opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking Appl 10(5):1113–1141

  26. Tavares CHA, Abrão T (2017) Bayesian estimators for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. URUCON, IEEE.

  27. Thakur S, Singh A (2020) Secure transmission using optimal antenna selection for MIMO underlay CRN with multiple primary users. IET Commun 14(7):1090–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vimal S, Kalaivani L, Kaliappan M (2017) Collaborative approach on mitigating spectrum sensing data hijack attack and dynamic spectrum allocation based on CASG modeling in wireless cognitive radio networks. Cluster Comput. 1-11.

  29. Wang L, Alexander Wyglinski M A Combined Approach for Distinguishing Different Types of Jamming Attacks Against Wireless Networks

  30. Wang M (2020) Performance analysis of opportunistic relay selection cooperative communication in cascaded fading channels. IOP Conf Series: Mat Sci Eng 719(1):012045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Q, Ren K, Ning P (2011) Anti-jamming Communication in Cognitive Radio Networks with Unknown Channel Statistics. 19th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

  32. Wei X, … Fan J (2017) Jammer localization in multi-hop wireless network: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 19(2):765–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu Q, Ding G, Wang J, Yao YD (2013) Spatial-temporal opportunity detection for spectrum-heterogeneous cognitive radio networks: two-dimensional sensing. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(2):516–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xing Y, Mathur C, Haleem M, Chandramouli R, Subbalakshmi K (2006) Priority based dynamic spectrum access with QoS and interference temperature constraints. In Proc. IEEE ICC 4420_4425.

  35. Xu X, Yang W, Cai Y (2017) Opportunistic relay selection improves reliability–reliability tradeoff and security–reliability tradeoff in random cognitive radio networks. IET Commun 11(3):335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yucek T, Arslan H (2009) A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 11(1):116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeng PECY, Hoang AT (2008) Sensing throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(4):13261337

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang D, … Shen XS (2017) Energy-harvesting-aided spectrum sensing and data transmission in heterogeneous cognitive radio sensor network. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(1):831–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang W, Ranjan Mallik K, Letaief KB (2009) Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing with energy detection in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 8(12)

  40. Zhang W, Ranjan Mallik K, Letaief KB (2009) Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing with energy detection in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 8(12)

  41. Zhao W, Li H, Jin M, Liu Y, Yoo SJ (2020) Eigenvalues-based universal spectrum sensing algorithm in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Syst J 15(3):3391–3402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zheng S, Kam PY, Liang YC, Zeng Y (2013) Spectrum sensing for digital primary signals in cognitive radio: a Bayesian approach for maximizing spectrum utilization. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(4):1774–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Data availability statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Panacorp Software Solutions, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, 629001, India

    P. Nagalakshmi

Authors
  1. P. Nagalakshmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Nagalakshmi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagalakshmi, P. An ingenious ROBD system to slay invasion attack for profitable spectrum utilization. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 7079–7104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13631-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13631-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation