Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil type identification model using a hybrid computer vision and machine learning approach

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 October 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Computer vision and its technologies are being used in the area of agricultural automation to identify, locate, and track targets for further image processing. Mostly, agricultural production has been highly dependent on natural resources like soil, water, and other related natural minerals from the soil. Soil classification is a way of arranging soils that have similar characteristics into groups. Identifying and classifying soils has a great role to play in agricultural productivity as it helps to provide relevant information which aids agricultural experts to recommend the type of crop best suited for a specific type of soil. This study mainly concentrated on classifying soil types such as clay soil, loam soil, sandy soil, peat soil, silt soil, and chalk soil. The soil images were collected from Amhara region at different locations by using a sony digital camera. To reduce image noise due to handshake we used a camera stand or arm to avoid other types of noises like environmental lighting effects and shadow. Once the dataset was collected, preprocessing such as resizing and gamma correction was performed to remove noise from the images, and contrast adjustment was also performed. Experimental research was applied as a general methodology and the experiment was conducted based on two approaches. The first approach used CNN as an end-to-end classifier and the second used a hybrid approach which used CNN as a feature extractor and SVM as a classifier. When CNN was used as an end-to-end classifier, a classification accuracy of 88% was achieved, whereas when the hybrid approach which used CNN as feature extractor and SVM as classifier was employed, a classification accuracy of 95% was achieved. Finally, we conclude that the hybrid approach is better than that of the End-to-End classification using our proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Change history

References

  1. Albawi S, Mohammed TA (2018) Understanding of a convolutional neural network, no. April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186

  2. Archana Reddy AKM et al (2020) Soil classification and crop suggestion using machine learning. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 8(7):1625–1628. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.30611

  3. Barman U, Choudhury RD (2020) Soil texture classification using multi class support vector machine. Inf Process Agric 7(2):318–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2019.08.001

  4. Bhargavi P, Jyothi S (2010) Soil classification using GATREE. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 2(5):184–191. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2010.2514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao X, Lu T, Liu P, Lu Q (2014) A soil moisture classification model based on SVM used in agricultural WSN. 2014 IEEE 7th Jt Int Inf Technol Artif Intell Conf ITAIC 2014 432–436. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITAIC.2014.7065086

  6. Getahun M (2015) Characterisation of agricultural soils in Cascape intervention woredas of Amhara Region, p 172. Online Available at: https://edepot.wur.nl/481237

  7. Harlianto PA, Adji TB, Setiawan NA (2017) Comparison of machine learning algorithms for soil type classification. Proceeding – 2017 3rd Int. Conf. Sci. Technol. ICST 2017, pp 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTC.2017.8011843

  8. Mengistu AD, Alemayehu DM (2018) Soil characterization and classification: a hybrid approach of computer vision and sensor network. Int J Electr Comput Eng 8(2):989–995. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i2.pp989-995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mesfin K, Tesfaye S, Girma K, Dejene A, Tsegaye G (2017) Description, characterization and classification of the major soils in Jinka Agricultural Research Center, South Western Ethiopia. J Soil Sci Environ Manag 8(3):61–69. https://doi.org/10.5897/jssem2015.0498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitra KC, Islam SMM (2018) Soil classification using machine learning methods and crop suggestion based on soil series, no. December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCITECHN.2018.8631943

  11. Nikiforova AA (2019) Performance of SVM classifier for image based soil classification. IEEE 46(6):467–488. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-6-467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salau AO, Jain S (2019) Feature extraction: a survey of the types, techniques, and applications. In: 5th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC), Noida, pp 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC45622.2019.8938371

  13. Satalino G, Panciera R, Balenzano A, Mattia F, Walker J (2012) COSMO-SkyMed multi-temporal data for land cover classification and soil moisture retrieval over an agricultural site in Southern Australia. IEEE 15701–5704. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6352317

  14. Xie H et al (2015) Soil type recognition as improved by genetic algorithm-based variable selection using near infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares discriminant analysis. Sci Rep 5(April):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10930

  15. Zebire DA, Ayele T, Ayana M (2019) Characterizing soils and the enduring nature of land uses around the Lake Chamo Basin in South-West Ethiopia. J Ecol Environ 43(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0104-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayodeji Olalekan Salau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: There was a typographical error in the author’s name “Ayodeji Olalekan Salau” in the original publication of this article .

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abeje, B.T., Salau, A.O., Gela, B.M. et al. Soil type identification model using a hybrid computer vision and machine learning approach. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 575–589 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15692-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15692-4

Keywords

Navigation